Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.4103/2278-330X.214584
A comparative study of bloodstream infections in acute myeloid leukemia according to different phases of treatment: Can we predict the organism?
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

Abstract
Introduction: The treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) consists of induction therapy with anthracyclines and cytarabine followed by two to four cycles of consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine after achieving remission. There have been very few studies comparing infections during induction and consolidation. We have analyzed blood cultures of patients with AML during episodes of fever occurring during induction and consolidation, for comparing the bloodstream infections in both the phases. Materials and Methods: Blood cultures of patients during febrile episodes were collected from central venous catheters and peripheral blood, both during induction and consolidation therapy of AML. Results: The study population included 52 AML patients. During induction, there were 52 episodes of fever and 25 (48%) blood cultures were positive, 15 of these blood cultures reported Gram-negative organisms, 9 reported Gram-positive organisms and 1 as yeast. During consolidation, 47 episodes of fever were recorded and blood cultures were positive in 12, of which 7 were Gram-negative, 5 were Gram-positive. Conclusion: The incidence of blood culture positive infections during therapy of AML at our center was higher. The predominant organism isolated was Gram-negative both during induction and consolidation. The incidence of blood culture positive infections had decreased by 50% during consolidation.
Publication History
Article published online:
22 December 2020
© 2017. MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Mayer RJ, Davis RB, Schiffer CA, Berg DT, Powell BL, Schulman P, et al. Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer
and Leukemia Group B. N Engl J Med 1994;331:896-903.
MissingFormLabel
- 2 Othus M, Kantarjian H, Petersdorf S, Ravandi F, Godwin J, Cortes J, et al. Declining rates of treatment-related mortality in patients with newly diagnosed
AML given 'intense' induction regimens: A report from SWOG and MD Anderson. Leukemia
2014;28:289-92.
MissingFormLabel
- 3 Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients
with cancer: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect
Dis 2011;52:427-31.
MissingFormLabel
- 4 Creutzig U, Kaspers GJ. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group
for diagnosis, standardization of response criteria, treatment outcomes, and reporting
standards for therapeutic trials in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:3432-3.
MissingFormLabel
- 5 Rahman MH, Khan MA, Islam MS, Afrose S, Ara T. High dose cytosine arabinoside in
the consolidation of adult acute myeloid leukemia. Mymensingh Med J 2012;21:213-9.
MissingFormLabel
- 6 Philip C, George B, Ganapule A, Korula A, Jain P, Alex AA, et al. Acute myeloid leukaemia: Challenges and real world data from India. Br J Haematol
2015;170:110-7.
MissingFormLabel
- 7 De Rosa FG, Motta I, Audisio E, Frairia C, Busca A, Di Perri G, et al. Epidemiology of bloodstream infections in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing
levofloxacin prophylaxis. BMC Infect Dis 2013;13:563.
MissingFormLabel
- 8 Prabhash K, Medhekar A, Ghadyalpatil N, Noronha V, Biswas S, Kurkure P, et al. Blood stream infections in cancer patients: A single center experience of isolates
and sensitivity pattern. Indian J Cancer 2010;47:184-8.
MissingFormLabel