Minimally invasive spine surgery: Adapting to a new technology

Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2014; 03(01): 001-002
DOI: 10.4103/2277-9167.131990

Editorial

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

P. Sarat Chandra

,

Paritosh Pandey

¹National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

References
1 van Alphen HA, Braakman R, Berfelo MW, Broere G, Bezemer PD, Kostense PJ. Chemonucleolysis or discectomy? Results of a randomized multicentre trial in patients with a herniated lumbar intervertebral disc (a preliminary report). Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1988; 43: 35-38
2 Mayer HM, Brock M. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: Surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy. J Neurosurg 1993; 78: 216-225
3 Hermantin FU, Peters T, Quartararo L, Kambin P. A prospective, randomized study comparing the results of open discectomy with those of video-assisted arthroscopic microdiscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 958-965
4 Huang TJ, Hsu RW, Li YY, Cheng CC. Less systemic cytokine response in patients following microendoscopic versus open lumbar discectomy. J Orthop Res 2005; 23: 406-411
5 Nellensteijn J, Ostelo R, Bartels R, Peul W, van Royen B, van Tulder M. Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations: A systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 181-204