Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2016; 10(03): 392-396
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.184162
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

The prevalence and distribution of nonsyndromic hyperdontia in a group of Qatari orthodontic and pediatric patients

Najah Alhashimi
1   Department of Dentistry, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
,
Feras H. Abed Al Jawad
1   Department of Dentistry, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
,
Muneera Al Sheeb
1   Department of Dentistry, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
,
Buthaina Al Emadi
1   Department of Dentistry, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
,
Jamal Al-Abdulla
1   Department of Dentistry, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
,
Hanan Al Yafei
1   Department of Dentistry, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: There is no data specific to the Qatari population on the prevalence and distribution of hyperdontia. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and distribution of hyperdontia in the permanent teeth among a group of Qatari sample and to compare the present results with findings from other populations. Materials and Methods: Records of 1269 Qatari patients (674 females; mean age 11.8 ± 2.3 and 595 males; mean age 11.4 ± 2.2 years) which included panoramic radiographs were examined to identify hyperdontia in the permanent dentition. Supernumerary teeth were assessed for their location, morphology, number, and whether impacted or not. Results: The prevalence of hyperdontia was 1.6% (females 0.7% and males 0.9%; P < 0169). The most common type of supernumerary teeth was the supplemental (45.5%), followed by the conical (40%). Of the supplemental teeth, the mandibular incisor was the most prevalent (60%), followed by the premolar (20%). No significant difference in the prevalence was found between the maxilla and mandible. More than half of supernumerary teeth identified were impacted (54.5%). Conclusions: The prevalence of hyperdontia in a group of Qatari population was within the normal range of the majority of published studies in the literature. Although not significant, hyperdontia cases were more prevalent in male patients.

Key words:

Hyperdontia - patient - prevalence - supernumerary teeth
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Zhu JF, Marcushamer M, King DL, Henry RJ. Supernumerary and congenitally absent teeth: A literature review. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1996; 20: 87-95
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 McNamara CM, O'Riordan BC, Blake M, Sandy JR. Cleidocranial dysplasia: Radiological appearances on dental panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 89-97
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Huang WH, Tsai TP, Su HL. Mesiodens in the primary dentition stage: A radiographic study. ASDC J Dent Child 1992; 59: 186-9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Babu V, Nagesh KS, Diwakar NR. A rare case of hereditary multiple impacted normal and supernumerary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998; 23: 59-61
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Díaz A, Orozco J, Fonseca M. Multiple hyperodontia: Report of a case with 17 supernumerary teeth with non syndromic association. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009; 14: E229-31
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Wang XP, Fan J. Molecular genetics of supernumerary tooth formation. Genesis 2011; 49: 261-77
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Anthonappa RP, King NM, Rabie AB. Prevalence of supernumerary teeth based on panoramic radiographs revisited. Pediatr Dent 2013; 35: 257-61
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Harris EF, Clark LL. An epidemiological study of hyperdontia in American blacks and whites. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 460-5
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Abed Al JawadFH, Al Yafei H, Al Sheeb M, Al Emadi B, Al Hashimi N. Hypodontia prevalence and distribution pattern in a group of Qatari orthodontic and pediatric patients: A retrospective study. Eur J Dent 2015; 9: 267-71
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Ghaznawi H, Daas H, Salako NO. A clinical and radiographic survey of selected dental anomalies and conditions in a Saudi Arabian population. Saudi Dent J 1999; 11: 8-13
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Esenlik E, Sayin MO, Atilla AO, Ozen T, Altun C, Basak F. Supernumerary teeth in a Turkish population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 848-52
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Ghabanchi J, Haghnegahdar AA, Khodadazadeh SH, Haghnegahdar S. A radiographic and clinical survey of dental anomalies in patients referring to Shiraz dental school. Shiraz Univ Dent J 2009; 10: 26-31
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Karadas M, Celikoglu M, Akdag MS. Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 337-41
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Yusof WZ. Non-syndrome multiple supernumerary teeth: Literature review. J Can Dent Assoc 1990; 56: 147-9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Niswander JD, Sujaku C. Congenital anomalies of teeth in Japanese children. Am J Phys Anthropol 1963; 21: 569-74
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Celikoglu M, Kamak H, Oktay H. Prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a non-syndrome Turkish population: Associated pathologies and proposed treatment. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15: e575-8
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Mitchell L. Supernumerary teeth. Dent Update 1989; 16: 65-6 68-9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Salem G. Prevalence of selected dental anomalies in Saudi children from Gizan region. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1989; 17: 162-3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Thongudomporn U, Freer TJ. Prevalence of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Aust Dent J 1998; 43: 395-8
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Amini F, Rakhshan V, Jamalzadeh S. Prevalence and pattern of accessory teeth (Hyperdontia) in permanent dentition of Iranian orthodontic patients. Iran J Public Health 2013; 42: 1259-65
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Fernández MontenegroP, Valmaseda CastellónE, Berini AytésL, Gay EscodaC. Retrospective study of 145 supernumerary teeth. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006; 11: E339-44
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Cochrane SM, Clark JR, Hunt NP. Late developing supernumerary teeth in the mandible. Br J Orthod 1997; 24: 293-6
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Nazif MM, Ruffalo RC, Zullo T. Impacted supernumerary teeth: A survey of 50 cases. J Am Dent Assoc 1983; 106: 201-4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Sasaki H, Funao J, Morinaga H, Nakano K, Ooshima T. Multiple supernumerary teeth in the maxillary canine and mandibular premolar regions: A case in the postpermanent dentition. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007; 17: 304-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Leco BerrocalMI, Martín MoralesJF, Martínez GonzálezJM. An observational study of the frequency of supernumerary teeth in a population of 2000 patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007; 12: E134-8
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Batra P, Duggal R, Parkash H. Non-syndromic multiple supernumerary teeth transmitted as an autosomal dominant trait. J Oral Pathol Med 2005; 34: 621-5
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Orhan AI, Ozer L, Orhan K. Familial occurrence of nonsyndromal multiple supernumerary teeth. A rare condition. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 891-7
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Rajab LD, Hamdan MA. Supernumerary teeth: Review of the literature and a survey of 152 cases. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002; 12: 244-54
    Search in Google Scholar