Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2016; 10(02): 250-253
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.178313
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Patients’ satisfaction and maintenance of fixed partial denture

Ghada Hassan Geiballa
1   Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
,
Neamat Hassan Abubakr
1   Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
2   Department of Clinical Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdul Rahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
,
Yahia Eltayib Ibrahim
1   Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 September 2019 (online)

  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aims of this study were to evaluate patient satisfaction with fixed prosthesis following placement and to assess the oral health and oral hygiene practices awareness by survey questionnaire. Materials and Methods: One hundred and ninety-two questionnaires were filled by patients wearing fixed prosthesis; the questionnaire included the subjective perception of treatment with fixed prosthesis, patients’ perception of clinical outcome, regarding esthetics, masticatory function, speech, and together patient's attitude toward oral hygiene measures. Results: Results showed that 84% of the patients were satisfied with their fixed prosthesis, while only 46.4% of patients were satisfied with the chewing ability. In concern, with esthetic outcome, 80% of patients showed that they were satisfied with the esthetic. The results showed that a high significantly number of patients did not use any form of interdental aids’ to clean their fixed prosthesis (94%). The main reason for not using any dental aids’ (91.1%) was a lack of post fixed prosthodontics instructions and not been informed by the dentist. Conclusion: High percentages of patients were satisfied with their fixed prosthesis. The most important finding of this study was that majority of patients showed a lack of knowledge regarding post fixed prosthodontics instructions and the significance of maintenance of fixed prosthesis using dental aids’. Of particular concern was the majority of dentists did not pay attention to the post treatment instructions concerning the maintenance of fixed prosthesis.

Key words:

Dental aids and patients - fixed prosthesis - oral health - oral hygiene practices - satisfaction
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Fiske J, Davis DM, Frances C, Gelbier S. The emotional effects of tooth loss in edentulous people. Br Dent J 1998; 184: 90-3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Newton JT, Prabhu N, Robinson PG. The impact of dental appearance on the appraisal of personal characteristics. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 429-34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Nikias MK, Sollecito WA, Fink R. An empirical approach to developing multidimensional oral status profiles. J Public Health Dent 1978; 38: 148-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Leao A, Sheiham A. Relation between clinical dental status and subjective impacts on daily living. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1408-13
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Social impact of oral conditions among older adults. Aust Dent J 1994; 39: 358-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Elias AC, Sheiham A. The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number and position of teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 649-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Yoshida M, Sato Y, Akagawa Y, Hiasa K. Correlation between quality of life and denture satisfaction in elderly complete denture wearers. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 77-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Feine JS, Dufresne E, Boudrias P, Lund JP. Outcome assessment of implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 575-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Frank RP, Brudvik JS, Leroux B, Milgrom P, Hawkins N. Relationship between the standards of removable partial denture construction, clinical acceptability, and patient satisfaction. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 521-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hakestam U, Söderfeldt B, Rydén O, Glantz E, Glantz PO. Dimensions of satisfaction among prosthodontic patients. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1997; 5: 111-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fromentin O, Boy-Lefèvre ML. Quality of prosthetic care: Patients’ level of expectation, attitude and satisfaction. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2001; 9: 123-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sondell K, Söderfeldt B, Palmqvist S. Dentist-patient communication and patient satisfaction in prosthetic dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 28-37
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Oates AJ, Fitzgerald M, Alexander G. Patient decision-making in relation to extensive restorative dental treatment. Part I: Characteristics of patients. Br Dent J 1995; 178: 449-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Näpänkangas R, Salonen MA, Raustia AM. A 10-year follow-up study of fixed metal ceramic prosthodontics. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 713-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Creugers NH, De Kanter RJ. Patients’ satisfaction in two long-term clinical studies on resin-bonded bridges. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 602-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Stipetic J, Celebic A, Jerolimov V, Vinter I, Kraljevic S, Rajic Z. The patient's and the therapist's evaluation of bridges of different materials and age. Coll Antropol 2000; 24 (Suppl. 01) 25-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tan K, Li AZ, Chan ES. Patient satisfaction with fixed partial dentures: A 5-year retrospective study. Singapore Dent J 2005; 27: 23-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Anderson JD. The need for criteria on reporting treatment outcomes. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 49-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 den Hartog L, Slater JJ, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Treatment outcome of immediate, early and conventional single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: A systematic review to survival, bone level, soft-tissue, aesthetics and patient satisfaction. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 1073-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Goiato MC, Torcato LB, Dos Santos DM, Moreno A, Antenucci RM, de Carvalho DekonSF. Quality of life and satisfaction of patients wearing implant-supported fixed partial denture: A cross-sectional survey of patients from Araçatuba city, Brazil. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 701-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Xiaoxian Meng, Gilbert GH, Duncan RP, Heft MW. Satisfaction with dental appearance among diverse groups of dentate adults. J Aging Health 2007; 19: 778-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ring L, Höfer S, Heuston F, Harris D, O'Boyle CA. Response shift masks the treatment impact on patient reported outcomes (PROs): The example of individual quality of life in edentulous patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cibirka RM, Razzoog M, Lang BR. Critical evaluation of patient responses to dental implant therapy. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 574-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Stellingsma K, Bouma J, Stegenga B, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant-retained overdentures. A prospective, comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 166-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Wismeijer D, Tawse-Smith A, Payne AG. Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant-assisted mandibular bilateral distal extension removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 20-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Balshi TJ, Mingledorff EB. Maintenance procedures for patients after complete fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1977; 37: 420-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar