Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2014; 08(03): 389-394
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.137653
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Three-dimensional evaluation of the mandibular third molars’ development in unilateral crossbite patients: A cone beam computed tomography study

Koray Halicioglu
1   Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkiye
,
Mevlut Celikoglu
2   Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkiye
,
Suleyman Kutalmis Buyuk
3   Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkiye
,
Ahmet Ercan Sekerci
4   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkiye
,
Faruk Izzet Ucar
5   Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkiye
,
Ibrahim Yavuz
3   Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkiye
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aim was to investigate mandibular third molar (3M)’s maturation in the crossbite and normal sides by two- and three-dimensional analyses using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed using CBCT of 25 patients (16 females and 9 males; mean age: 16.8 ± 2.9 years) with unilateral posterior crossbite. The formation stages and the volume of the mandibular 3Ms were evaluated by means of CBCT data of the patients without knowing the crossbite side of the patients. Results: Statistically no significant differences were found in the development of the 3Ms between the crossbite and the control sides, whereas the volume of 3M was found to be less in the crossbite side than in the normal side (P = 0.021). Conclusions: A volume of 3M was found to be less in the crossbite side than in the normal side.

Key words:

Dental growth - dental maturation - third molar development - unilateral crossbite
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Schour I, Massler M. The development of the human dentition. J Am Dent Assoc 1941; 28: 1153-60
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 1973; 45: 211-27
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Moorrees CF, Fanning EA, Hunt Jr EE. Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res 1963; 42: 1490-502
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Yang F, Jacobs R, Willems G. Dental age estimation through volume matching of teeth imaged by cone-beam CT. Forensic Sci Int 2006; 159 (Suppl. 01) S78-83
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Belcastro MG, Bonfiglioli B, Rastelli E, Cingolani M. Age estimation by pulp/tooth ratio in canines by mesial and vestibular peri-apical X-rays. J Forensic Sci 2007; 52: 1151-5
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Maret D, Peters OA, Dedouit F, Telmon N, Sixou M. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A useful tool for dental age estimation?. Med Hypotheses 2011; 76: 700-2
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Someda H, Saka H, Matsunaga S, Ide Y, Nakahara K, Hirata S. et al. Age estimation based on three-dimensional measurement of mandibular central incisors in Japanese. Forensic Sci Int 2009; 185: 110-4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Tardivo D, Sastre J, Ruquet M, Thollon L, Adalian P, Leonetti G. et al. Three-dimensional modeling of the various volumes of canines to determine age and sex: A preliminary study. J Forensic Sci 2011; 56: 766-70
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Aboshi H, Takahashi T, Komuro T. Age estimation using microfocus X-ray computed tomography of lower premolars. Forensic Sci Int 2010; 200: 35-40
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Star H, Thevissen P, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Solheim T, Willems G. Human dental age estimation by calculation of pulp-tooth volume ratios yielded on clinically acquired cone beam computed tomography images of monoradicular teeth. J Forensic Sci 2011; 56 (Suppl. 01) S77-82
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Halicioglu K. Dental age in patients with impacted maxillary canines related to the position of the impacted teeth. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34: 394
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. Genetic, nutritional, and maturational correlates of dental development. J Dent Res 1965; 44 Suppl: 228-42
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Celikoglu M, Erdem A, Dane A, Demirci T. Dental age assessment in orthodontic patients with and without skeletal malocclusions. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011; 14: 58-62
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Janson GR, Martins DR, Tavano O, Dainesi EA. Dental maturation in subjects with extreme vertical facial types. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20: 73-8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Uysal T, Yagci A, Ramoglu SI. Dental maturation in patients with unilateral posterior crossbite. World J Orthod 2009; 10: 383-8
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Kennedy DB, Osepchook M. Unilateral posterior crossbite with mandibular shift: A review. J Can Dent Assoc 2005; 71: 569-73
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Sonnesen L, Bakke M. Bite force in children with unilateral crossbite before and after orthodontic treatment. A prospective longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod 2007; 29: 310-3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983; 83: 382-90
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Miloglu O, Celikoglu M, Dane A, Cantekin K, Yilmaz AB. Is the assessment of dental age by the Nolla method valid for eastern Turkish children?. J Forensic Sci 2011; 56: 1025-8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Dhanjal KS, Bhardwaj MK, Liversidge HM. Reproducibility of radiographic stage assessment of third molars. Forensic Sci Int 2006; 159 (Suppl. 01) S74-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Ruiz-Mealin EV, Parekh S, Jones SP, Moles DR, Gill DS. Radiographic study of delayed tooth development in patients with dental agenesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141: 307-14
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Nur B, Kusgoz A, Bayram M, Celikoglu M, Nur M, Kayipmaz S. et al. Validity of demirjian and nolla methods for dental age estimation for Northeastern Turkish children aged 5-16 years old. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17: e871-7
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Cantekin K, Yilmaz Y, Demirci T, Celikoglu M. Morphologic analysis of third-molar mineralization for eastern Turkish children and youth. J Forensic Sci 2012; 57: 531-4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Ahlowalia MS, Patel S, Anwar HM, Cama G, Austin RS, Wilson R. et al. Accuracy of CBCT for volumetric measurement of simulated periapical lesions. Int Endod J 2013; 46: 538-46
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Celikoglu M, Cantekin K, Ceylan I. Dental age assessment: The applicability of Demirjian method in eastern Turkish children. J Forensic Sci 2011; 56 (Suppl. 01) S220-2
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Esenlik E, Atak A, Altun C. Evaluation of dental maturation in children according to sagittal jaw relationship. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 38-43
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar