CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2014; 08(03): 381-388
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.137652
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Comparison of anti-plaque efficacy between a low and high cost dentifrice: A short term randomized double-blind trial

Rahul Ganavadiya
1   Department of Public Health Dentistry, People's Dental Academy, Bhanpur, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
B. R. Chandra Shekar
1   Department of Public Health Dentistry, People's Dental Academy, Bhanpur, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Pankaj Goel
1   Department of Public Health Dentistry, People's Dental Academy, Bhanpur, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Sudheer G. Hongal
1   Department of Public Health Dentistry, People's Dental Academy, Bhanpur, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Manish Jain
1   Department of Public Health Dentistry, People's Dental Academy, Bhanpur, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Ruchika Gupta
1   Department of Public Health Dentistry, People's Dental Academy, Bhanpur, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the anti-plaque efficacy of a low and high cost commercially available tooth paste among 13-20 years old adolescents in a Residential Home, Bhopal, India. Materials and Methods: The study was randomized double-blind parallel clinical trial conducted in a Residential Home, Bhopal, India. A total of 65 patients with established dental plaque and gingivitis were randomly assigned to either low cost or high cost dentifrice group for 4 weeks. The plaque and gingival scores at baseline and post-intervention were assessed and compared. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and the independent sample t-test. The statistical significance was fixed at 0.05. Results: Results indicated a significant reduction in plaque and gingival scores in both groups post-intervention compared with the baseline. Difference between the groups was not significant. No adverse events were reported and both the dentifrices were well-tolerated. Conclusion: Low cost dentifrice is equally effective to the high cost dentifrice in reducing plaque and gingival inflammation.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Prasad KV, Sohani R, Tikare S, Yelamalli M, Rajesh G, Javali SB. Anti-plaque efficacy of two commercially available dentifrices. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent 2009; 1: 12-7
  • 2 Singh S, Chaknis P, DeVizio W, Petrone M, Panagakos FS, Proskin HM. A clinical investigation of the efficacy of three commercially available dentifrices for controlling established gingivitis and supragingival plaque. J Clin Dent 2010; 21: 105-10
  • 3 Jin LJ, Armitage GC, Klinge B, Lang NP, Tonetti M, Williams RC. Global oral health inequalities: Task group - Periodontal disease. Adv Dent Res 2011; 23: 221-6
  • 4 Shaju JP, Zade RM, Das M. Prevalence of periodontitis in the Indian population: A literature review. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2011; 15: 29-34
  • 5 Lin S, Mauk A. Oral Health: Addressing Dental Diseases in Rural India. Ch 4. In: Raghavan R, Johar Z. Implementing public health interventions in developing countries. ICTPH; Thanjavur, India: IKP Centre for Technologies in Public Health; 2011: p. 105-29
  • 6 Chandra Shekar BR, Reddy C. Oral health status in relation to socioeconomic factors among the municipal employees of Mysore city. Indian J Dent Res 2011; 22: 410-8
  • 7 Petersen PE, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H, Estupinan-Day S, Ndiaye C. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bull World Health Organ 2005; 83: 661-9
  • 8 Sharda AJ, Shetty S. Relationship of periodontal status and dental caries status with oral health knowledge, attitude and behavior among professional students in India. Int J Oral Sci 2009; 1: 196-206
  • 9 Barnes VM, Richter R, DeVizio W. Comparison of the short-term antiplaque/antibacterial efficacy of two commercial dentifrices. J Clin Dent 2010; 21: 101-4
  • 10 Fischman SL. The history of oral hygiene products: How far have we come in 6000 years?. Periodontol 2000 1997; 15: 7-14
  • 11 Garcia RI. Mouthrinses and dentifrices are effective antigingivitis and antiplaque agents. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2008; 8: 13-4
  • 12 Stamm JW. Multi-function toothpastes for better oral health: A behavioural perspective. Int Dent J 2007; 57: 351-363
  • 13 Bhambal A, Kothari S, Saxena S, Jain M. Comparative effect of neemstick and toothbrush on plaque removal and gingival health – A clinical trial. J Adv Oral Res 2011; 2: 51-5
  • 14 Press Note on Poverty Estimates 2009-10. Government of India, Planning Commission; March 2012
  • 15 Cugini M, Thompson M, Warren PR. Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7: 1-9
  • 16 Benamghar L, Penaud J, Kaminsky P, Abt F, Martin J. Comparison of gingival index and sulcus bleeding index as indicators of periodontal status. Bull World Health Organ 1982; 60: 147-51
  • 17 Amrutesh S, Malini J, Tandur PS, Patki PS. Clinical evaluation of a novel herbal dental cream in plaque formation: A double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Exp Pharmacol 2010; 2: 105-9
  • 18 Iqbal K, Asmat M, Jawed S, Mushtaque A, Mohsin F, Hanif S. et al. Role of different ingredients of tooth pastes and mouthwashes in oral health. JPDA 2011; 20: 163-70
  • 19 Davies R, Scully C, Preston AJ. Dentifrices – An update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15: e976-82
  • 20 Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, Danser MM, Van der Velden U. Relationship between the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush and brushing force. J Clin Periodontol 1998; 25: 413-6
  • 21 Barnes VM, Vandeven M, Richter R, Xu T. The modified gingival margin plaque index: A predictable clinical method. J Clin Dent 2008; 19: 131-3