Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2014; 08(02): 241-248
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.130619
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Wear of two pit and fissure sealants in contact with primary teeth

Rodrigo Galo
1   Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Marta Maria Martins Giamatei Contente
2   Department of Pediatric Clinics, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Maria Cristina Borsatto
2   Department of Pediatric Clinics, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 September 2019 (online)

  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Wear simulations may provide an indication of the clinical performance of pit-and-fissure sealants when associated with primary teeth as counterbody, restricting the involved variables. The aim of this study was to evaluate wear of dental materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants in contact with primary teeth. Materials and Methods: A resinous sealant (Fluroshield®) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Vitremer®) were selected in a post-plate design, using as counterbody primary tooth pins (4 × 4 × 2 mm) at 3 and 10 N vertical load, 1 Hz frequency, 900 wear cycles in artificial saliva (n = 15). Attrition coefficient values were obtained and the material and primary tooth volumes were analyzed. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Duncan's test (P < 0.05). Results: Fluroshield® presented the highest attrition coefficient values for the 3 N but these values decreased significantly for the 10 N load. The means for volume loss (3 mm) of the different samples after the wear test were not statistically different for the materials. The volume loss values for the primary teeth were statistically different and there was an increase in volume loss with the increase of the load applied in the wear tests. Conclusions: Differences were also observed with regard to the surface deformation characteristics. The wear rates of primary tooth enamel vary according to the type of material and the load applied during mastication.

Key words:

Pit and fissure sealant - preventive material - primary teeth - two-body wear
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Sarkar NK. Internal corrosion in dental composite wear. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 371-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Magne P, Oh WS, Pintado MR, DeLong R. Wear of enamel and veneering ceramics after laboratory and chairside finishing procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 669-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Koczorowski R, Włoch S. Evaluation of wear of selected prosthetic materials in contact with enamel and dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 453-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Zipkin I, McClure FJ. Salivary citrate and dental erosion; procedure for determining citric acid in saliva; dental erosion and citric acid in saliva. J Dent Res 1949; 28: 613-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Shulman EH, Robinson HB. Salivary citrate content and erosion of the teeth. J Dent Res 1948; 27: 541-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lussi A. Dental erosion clinical diagnosis and case history taking. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104: 191-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Maupomé G, Díez-de-Bonilla J, Torres-Villaseñor G, Andrade-Delgado LC, Castaño VM. In vitro quantitative assessment of enamel microhardness after exposure to eroding immersion in a cola drink. Caries Res 1998; 32: 148-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lussi A, Jäggi T, Schärer S. The influence of different factors on in vitro enamel erosion. Caries Res 1993; 27: 387-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lussi A, Jaeggi T, Jaeggi-Schärer S. Prediction of the erosive potential of some beverages. Caries Res 1995; 29: 349-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mair LH, Stolarski TA, Vowles RW, Lloyd CH. Wear: Mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop. J Dent 1996; 24: 141-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kim SK, Kim KN, Chang IT, Heo SJ. A study of the effects of chewing patterns on occlusal wear. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 1048-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ghazal M, Yang B, Ludwig K, Kern M. Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 502-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ghazal M, Kern M. Wear of human enamel and nano-filled composite resin denture teeth under different loading forces. J Oral Rehabil 2009; 36: 58-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Stober T, Lutz T, Gilde H, Rammelsberg P. Wear of resin denture teeth by two-body contact. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 243-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hu X, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. Wear of three dental composites under different testing conditions. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 756-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 218-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Sajewicz E. On evaluation of wear resistance of tooth enamel and dental materials. Wear 2006; 260: 1256-61
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Borsatto MC, Thomaz MY, Contente MM, Gomes-Silva JM, Mellara Tde S, Galo R. et al. Bonding agent underneath sealant: Shear bond strength to oil-contaminated. Braz Dent J 2010; 21: 50-4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Villela-Rosa AC, Gonçalves M, Orsi IA, Miani PK. Shear bond strength of self-etch and total-etch bonding systems at different dentin depths. Braz Oral Res 2011; 25: 109-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Papacchini F, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants. J Dent 2005; 33: 459-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gomes-Silva JM, Torres CP, Contente MM, Oliveira MA, Palma-Dibb RG, Borsatto MC. Bond strength of a pit-and-fissure sealant associated to etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesive systems to saliva-contaminated enamel: Individual vs. simultaneous light curing. Braz Dent J 2008; 19: 341-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mahoney E, Holt A, Swain M, Kilpatrick N. The hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary molar teeth: An ultra-micro-indentation study. J Dent 2000; 28: 589-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Oilo G. Biodegradation of dental composites/glass-ionomer cements. Adv Dent Res 1992; 6: 50-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Braem MJ, Lambrechts P, Gladys S, Vanherle G. In vitro fatigue behavior of restorative composites and glass ionomers. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 137-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Suwannaroop P, Chaijareenont P, Koottathape N, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M. In vitro wear resistance, hardness and elastic modulus of artificial denture teeth. Dent Mater J 2011; 30: 461-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hahnel S, Behr M, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101: 269-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bates JF, Stafford GD, Harrison A. Masticatory function--a review of the literature. 1. The form of the masticatory cycle. J Oral Rehabil 1975; 2: 281-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Turssi CP, Hara AT, Serra MC, Rodrigues Jr AL. Effect of storage media upon the surface micromorphology of resin-based restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 864-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Karaoğlanoğlu S, Akgül N, Ozdabak HN, Akgül HM. Effectiveness of surface protection for glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified composite resins. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 96-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Heintze SD, Zellweger G, Zappini G. The relationship between physical parameters and wear of dental composites. Wear 2007; 263: 1138-46
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 33-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 da Cunha MR, Puppin-Rontani RM, Ferracane JL, Correr-Sobrinho L. In vitro wear evaluation of dental materials in primary teeth. Am J Dent 2006; 19: 364-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Xie D, Brantley W, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 129-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Mazer RB, Leinfelder KF, Russell CM. Degradation of microfilled posterior composite. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 185-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kon M, Kakuta K, Ogura H. Effects of occlusal and brushing forces on wear of composite resins. Dent Mater J 2006; 25: 183-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Condon JR, Adey JD. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 4932-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1405-11
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Yap AU, Tan CH, Chung SM. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 269-74
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Sajewicz E, Kulesza Z. A new tribometer for friction and wear studies of dental materials and hard tooth tissues. Tribol Int 2007; 40: 885-95
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Hu X, Harrington E, Marquis PM, Shortall AC. The influence of cyclic loading on the wear of a dental composite. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 907-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Lambrechts P, Goovaerts K, Bharadwaj D, De Munck J, Bergmans L, Peumans M. et al. Degradation of tooth structure and restorative materials: A review. Wear 2006; 261: 980-6
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar