PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2013; 07(04): 474-483
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.120682
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Thickness of immediate dentin sealing materials and its effect on the fracture load of a reinforced all-ceramic crown

Ana Maria Spohr
1   Department of Dental Materials, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
,
Gilberto Antonio Borges
2   Department of Dental Materials and Restorative Dentistry, University of Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil
,
Jeffrey A. Platt
3   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Dental Biomaterials, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
26. September 2019 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
 als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate, in vitro, the thickness of immediate dentin sealing (IDS) materials on full crown preparations and its effect on the fracture load of a reinforced all-ceramic crown. Materials and Methods: Sixty premolars received full crown preparation and were divided into the following groups according to the IDS technique: G1-control; G2-Clearfil SE Bond; and G3-Clearfil SE Bond and Protect Liner F. After the impressions were taken, the preparations were temporized with acrylic resin crowns. IPS empress 2 restorations were fabricated and later cemented on the preparations with Panavia F. 10 specimens from each group were submitted to fracture load testing. The other 10 specimens were sectioned buccolingually before the thicknesses of Panavia F, Clearfil SE Bond and Protect Liner F were measured in 10 different positions using a microscope. Results: According to analysis of variance and Tukey′s test, the fracture load of Group 3 (1300 N) was significantly higher than that of Group 1 (1001 N) (P < 0.01). Group 2 (1189 N) was not significantly different from Groups 1 and 3. The higher thickness of Clearfil SE Bond was obtained in the concave part of the preparation. Protect Liner F presented a more uniform range of values at different positions. The thickness of Panavia F was higher in the occlusal portion of the preparation. Conclusions: The film thickness formed by the IDS materials is influenced by the position under the crown, suggesting its potential to increase the fracture load of the IPS empress 2 ceramic crowns.

Key words:

Ceramic - film thickness - fracture load - immediate dentin sealing
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Corona SA, Garcia PP, Palma-Dibb RG, Chimello DT. Indirect aesthetic adhesive restoration with fibre-reinforced composite resin. Dent Update 2004; 31: 482-4
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Terata R. Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of temporary cement - Study on removal of temporary cement. Dent Mater J 1993; 12: 18-28
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Watanabe EK, Yamashita A, Imai M, Yatani H, Suzuki K. Temporary cement remnants as an adhesion inhibiting factor in the interface between resin cements and bovine dentin. Int J Prosthodont 1997; 10: 440-52
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Woody TL, Davis RD. The effect of eugenol-containing and eugenol-free temporary cements on microleakage in resin bonded restorations. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 175-80
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Paul SJ, Schärer P. Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesive bonding systems on dentine. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 8-14
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD, Horner JA, Pashley DH, Caughman WF. Dentin permeability: Sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 13-20
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Nikaido T, Takada T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The early bond strength of dual cured resin cement to enamel and dentin. J Jpn Dent Mater 1992; 11: 910-5
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Otsuki M, Yamada T, Inokoshi S. Establishment of a composite resin inlay technique. Part 7. Use of low viscous resin. J Jpn Conserv Dent 1993; 36: 1324-30
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Duarte RM, de Goes MF, Montes MA. Effect of time on tensile bond strength of resin cement bonded to dentine and low-viscosity composite. J Dent 2006; 34: 52-61
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: Dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12: 111-21
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 511-9
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Nikaido T, Cho E, Nakajima M, Tashiro H, Toba S, Burrow MF. et al. Tensile bond strengths of resin cements to bovine dentin using resin coating. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 41A-6
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Sultana S, Nikaido T, Matin K, Ogata M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of resin coating on dentin bonding of resin cement in Class II cavities. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 506-13
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 28-35
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Jones DW. Development of dental ceramics. An historical perspective. Dent Clin North Am 1985; 29: 621-44
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Van Noort R. Introduction to Dental Materials. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994: p. 201-14
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 17 El-Mowafy O. The use of resin cements in restorative dentistry to overcome retention problems. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67: 97-102
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Groten M, Pröbster L. The influence of different cementation modes on the fracture resistance of feldspathic ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997; 10: 169-77
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Liu B, Lu C, Wu Y, Zhang X, Arola D, Zhang D. The effects of adhesive type and thickness on stress distribution in molars restored with all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthodont 2011; 20: 35-44
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 245-9
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG, Belser UC, Meyer JM. Effect of cement film thickness on the fracture resistance of a machinable glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 172-7
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Prakki A, Cilli R, Da Costa AU, Gonçalves SE, Mondelli RF, Pereira JC. Effect of resin luting film thickness on fracture resistance of a ceramic cemented to dentin. J Prosthodont 2007; 16: 172-8
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Stavridakis MM, Krejci I, Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations: Thickness of pre-cured Dentin Bonding Agent and effect of surface cleaning. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 747-57
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Peter A, Paul SJ, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Film thickness of various dentine bonding agents. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 568-73
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1652-8
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Udo T, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Weerasinghe DS, Harada N, Foxton RM. et al. Enhancement of adhesion between resin coating materials and resin cements. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 519-25
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Wang CJ, Millstein PL, Nathanson D. Effects of cement, cement space, marginal design, seating aid materials, and seating force on crown cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 786-90
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Magne P, Kwon KR, Belser UC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Crack propensity of porcelain laminate veneers: A simulated operatory evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 327-34
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Grajower R, Zuberi Y, Lewinstein I. Improving the fit of crowns with die spacers. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 555-63
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Jacob SJ, Hegde C, Prasad KD, Shetty M. An in vitro study to evaluate the effect of storage time and application of subsequent layers on the variation in thickness of three commercially available die spacers. Indian J Dent Res 2010; 21: 92-7
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Davis DR. Comparison of fit of two types of all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 12-6
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Lüthy H, Gauckler LJ, Schärer P. et al. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 2006; 37: 685-93
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 1311-5
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1985; 1: 197-9
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Boening KW, Walter MH, Reppel PD. Non-cast titanium restorations in fixed prosthodontics. J Oral Rehabil 1992; 19: 281-7
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971; 131: 107-11
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Björn AL, Björn H, Grkovic B. Marginal fit of restorations and its relation to periodontal bone level. II. Crowns. Odontol Revy 1970; 21: 337-46
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Okuda M, Nikaido T, Maruoka R, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strengths to cavity floor dentin in indirect composite restorations using resin coating. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19: 38-46
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Kim JH, Miranda P, Kim DK, Lawn BR. Effect of an adhesive interlayer on the fracture of a brittle coating on a supporting substrate. J Mater Res 2003; 18: 222-7
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Burke FJ, Watts DC. Effect of differing resin luting systems on fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns. Quintessence Int 1998; 29: 21-7
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Burke FJ. Maximising the fracture resistance of dentine-bonded all-ceramic crowns. J Dent 1999; 27: 169-73
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Braga RR, Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Polymerization contraction stress in dual-cure cements and its effect on interfacial integrity of bonded inlays. J Dent 2002; 30: 333-40
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Douglas WH, Fields RP, Fundingsland JA. A comparison between the microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorative systems. J Dent 2002; 30: 259-69
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 812-7
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. Stresses generated by luting resins during cementation of composite and ceramic inlays. J Oral Rehabil 1992; 19: 115-22
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Furukawa K, Inai N, Tagami J. The effects of luting resin bond to dentin on the strength of dentin supported by indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 136-42
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Kitayama S, Pilecki P, Nasser NA, Bravis T, Wilson RF, Nikaido T. et al. Effect of resin coating on adhesion and microleakage of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing fabricated all-ceramic crowns after occlusal loading: A laboratory study. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117: 454-62
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Ritter RG. Multifunctional uses of a novel ceramic-lithium disilicate. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010; 22: 332-41
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 479-88
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar