Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2015; 06(02): 059-065
DOI: 10.4103/0976-5042.159238
Original Article
Journal of Digestive Endoscopy

Role of endoscopy in evaluating upper gastrointestinal tract lesions in rural population

Sharanabasavaraj Javali
Department of General Surgery, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences, Bengaluru
,
M. Madan
1   Department of General Surgery, Sri Devraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, Karnataka
,
M. L. Harendrakumar
2   Department of Pathology, Sri Devraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, Karnataka
,
M. S. Mahesh
1   Department of General Surgery, Sri Devraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, Karnataka
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 September 2019 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Before the advent of endoscopy direct access to the lesion for the confirmation of the diagnosis was difficult, this posed difficulty in contemplating adequate and appropriate surgery. Endoscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool has grown in recent years. Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is one of the most fascinating branch which serves not only as a means of resolving or amplifying the diagnosis made clinically or by X-ray, but also a primary diagnostic procedure for conditions not otherwise diagnosable on unoperated case. Fiber optic upper GI endoscopy has already become firmly established as a reliable, quick and inexpensive tool. This study was done to detect the upper gastrointestinal lesions in rural population of Kolar District, the distribution pattern of various upper GI lesions in patients presenting with upper GI symptoms and to follow the endoscopic diagnosis for medical and surgical management. Materials and Methods: The study group includes patients reporting to outpatient department and also the inpatients in wards of General Surgery and other departments, who have upper GI symptoms, were advised endoscopy at R. L. JALAPPA Hospital and Research Centre, Kolar, from a period of December 2011 to August 2013. Results: Of the 600 cases, 370 were males, and 230 were females. Disease incidence was highest in 51–70 years age group, that is, 21.6%. Pain abdomen was the most common symptom. Epigastric tenderness was the most common sign among the patients clinically. Reflux esophagitis and diffuse gastritis formed most common cases (307 cases). The incidence of duodenitis - 7.83%, peptic ulcer -3.3%, esophageal varices - 1.5%, the incidence of carcinoma esophagus and carcinoma stomach was approximately same that is, 4.5% and 4.6% respectively. The incidence of esophageal candidiasis was 4.16%. The majority of the patients had a normal study that is, 14.5%. Conclusion: Upper GI lesions were more common in males. The incidence of diseases was highest among the elderly age group. Most of the benign mucosal lesions were mainly due to spicy food and habit of tobacco consumption. The incidence of malignancy was mostly among older age group above 50 years. The incidence of the normal study was high owing to increased medical care, easy availability of the procedure and increased medical awareness among patients. In all these cases, upper GI endoscopy not only helped in diagnosing the disease but also helped to get information about pathology, extent of disease and complications that have occurred. This study highlights the importance of diagnostic and therapeutic uses, recording of the various gastroenterological diseases we come across in rural population.

 
  • References

  • 1 Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R; Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:1900-20.
  • 2 Khuroo MS, Mahajan R, Zargar SA, Javid G, Munshi S. Prevalence of peptic ulcer in India: An endoscopic and epidemiological study in urban Kashmir. Gut 1989;30:930-4.
  • 3 Barkun A, Bardou M, Marshall JK; Nonvariceal Upper GI Bleeding Consensus Conference Group. Consensus recommendations for managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:843-57.
  • 4 Spiegel BM, Vakil NB, Ofman JJ. Endoscopy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage: Is sooner better? A systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:1393-404.
  • 5 Ray G, Pal S. Trends in endodiagnosis of upper gastrointestinal diseases at a referral railway hospital. J Dig Endosc 2011;2:213-9.
  • 6 Al-Nakib B, Al-Liddawi H. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy experience in Kuwait: Analysis of 1019 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 1981;23:605-7.
  • 7 Shroff CP, Nanivadekar SA. Endoscopic brushing cytology and biopsy in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal tract lesions. A study of 350 cases. Acta Cytol 1988;32:455-60.
  • 8 Mimidis K, Papadopoulos V, Margaritis V, Thomopoulos K, Gatopoulou A, Nikolopoulou V, et al. Predisposing factors and clinical symptoms in HIV-negative patients with Candida oesophagitis: Are they always present? Int J Clin Pract 2005;59:210-3.
  • 9 Underwood JA, Williams JW, Keate RF. Clinical findings and risk factors for Candida esophagitis in outpatients. Dis Esophagus 2003;16:66-9.
  • 10 Shennak MM, Tarawneh MS, Al-Sheikh TM. Upper gastrointestinal diseases in symptomatic Jordanians: A prospective endoscopic study Ann Saudi Med 1997;17:4.