CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2011; 3(02): 104-109
DOI: 10.4103/0974-2727.86843
Original Article

Agreement of Two Different Laboratory Methods Used to Measure Electrolytes

Venencia Albert
Department of Laboratory Medicine, JPNATC, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
,
Arulselvi Subramanian
Department of Laboratory Medicine, JPNATC, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
,
Kanchana Rangarajan
Department of Laboratory Medicine, JPNATC, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
,
Ravindra Mohan Pandey
Department of Biostatistics, JPNATC, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations

Source of Support: Nil

ABSTRACT

Aim: The aim of our study was to do an agreement analysis of two different laboratory methods used to measure electrolytes i.e., between the ISE based Beckman Coulter Synchron CX9 PRO Biochemistry analyzer and RAL′s Ion3 Flame Photometer (Técnica para el Laboratorio, Barcelona, Spain), in serum samples.

Materials and Methods: This cross sectional study was done over a period of three months from September′09 through December′09 on routine biochemistry samples. A total of 6492 samples were received for routine biochemistry analysis from those 630 blood samples were randomly processed for this study. Two ml of sample was taken in a plain gel tube (LABTECH Disposables, Ahmedabad, India), centrifuged and further processed using both systems within one hour of the sampling to obtain the Na and K concentrations in the samples. The bias and variability of differences in measured values were analyzed according to Bland and Altman method.

Results: Flame photometry method has drawbacks such as low throughput, requires manual operation, is a time consuming procedure. Ion selective electrodes technique is a more universal method for the high throughput determination of electrolytes in physiological samples; Beckman Coulter Synchron CX9 PRO is an example of such a system. The mean difference between the two methods (standard minus test) and 95% limits of agreement for sodium in serum was -7.8±17.3 (-42.2 to 26.6) and in urine was -22±41 (-104 to 60). Similarly, the mean difference between the two methods for potassium values in serum was found to be -0.25±0.75 (-1.75 to 1.25) and in urine was -5.3±38.9 (-83.1 to 72.5). With 95% confidence interval, the value of sodium and potassium as determined by both the methods lie between the upper and lower limit showing 95% limits of agreement.

Conclusion: Good degree of agreement was seen on comparing the two methods for measuring the electrolytes; the use of Synchron CX9 in place of Flame photometer for electrolyte analysis in serum and urine is justified or use the two interchangeably.



Publication History

Article published online:
09 May 2020

© 2011.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Hald PM. The flame photometer for the measurement of sodium and potassium in biological materials. J Biol Chem 1946;167:499-510.
  • 2 Burnett RW, Covington AK, Fogh-Andersen N, Külpmann WR, Lewenstam A, Maas AH, et al. Recommendations for measurement of and conventions for reporting sodium and potassium by ion-selective electrodes in undiluted serum, plasma or whole blood. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC). IFCC Scientific Division Working Group on Selective Electrodes. Clin Chem Lab Med 2000;38:1065-71.
  • 3 User manual Beckman coulter synchron CX9 PRO. USA: Beckman Coulter Inc; 2003.
  • 4 Barnes RB, Richardson D, Berry JW, Hood RL. Flame photometry: a rapid analytical procedure. Industr Engin Chem (Anal. Ed). 1945;17:60
  • 5 Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:135-60.
  • 6 Kroll MH, Elin RJ. Interference with clinical laboratory analyses. Clin Chem 1994;40:1996-2005.
  • 7 Kang JA, Song KE, Lee WK, Choi SM, Kim YS. Comparitive analysis of management and test results among three different electrolyte-anlayzing instruments. Korean J Clin Pathol 1993;13:51-8
  • 8 Koch WF, ed. Proceeding of the workshop on direct potentiometric measurements in blood, held at NIST, Gaithersburg, MD,May 18-20, 1983. Vilanova, Pk NCCLS, 1985.
  • 9 NCCLS document C29-P. Standardization of sodium and potassium ion-selective electrode systems to the flame photometric reference method. Villanova, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1989.
  • 10 Preusse CJ, Fuchs C. Comparison of ion-selective electrodes and flame photometry for the determination of serum Na+ and K+ for clinical purposes. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1979;17:639-45.
  • 11 Worth HG. A comparison of the measurement of sodium and potassium by flame photometry and ion-selective electrode. Ann Clin Biochem 1985;22:343-50.
  • 12 Mikolaenko I, Benson E, Konrad RJ, Chaffin C, Robinson CA, Hardy RW. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter LX20 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer. Lab Med 2000;31:387-93.