CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2016; 37(04): 239-241
DOI: 10.4103/0971-5851.195734
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effect of areca nut chewing and maximal mouth opening in schoolgoing children in Ahmedabad

Azizfatema Munawer Khan
Physiotherapy Department of SBB College, VS General Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
,
Megha Sheth
Physiotherapy Department of SBB College, VS General Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
,
Romsha Purohit
Physiotherapy Department of SBB College, VS General Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
› Author Affiliations
Financial support and sponsorship Nil.

Abstract

Context: Areca nut is chewed by itself and in various scented preparations. Areca nut chewing is widely practiced in many parts of Asia, including India. Users often consider it harmless and report a sense of well-being, but evidence has shown that it is far from harmless and can have multiple oral health implications such as oral submucosal fibrosis posing difficulty in opening mouth and carcinogenesis. Studies in India have reported increasing prevalence of this habit among schoolgoing children. The objectives of the study were to find the effect of areca nut chewing on mouth opening, compare it with the children not having this habit, and to find correlation between maximal mouth opening (MMO) and months of areca nut chewing. Aims: The aim of this study is to find the effect of areca nut chewing on MMO in schoolgoing children in Ahmedabad. Settings and Design: An observational analytical study was conducted across various schools of Ahmedabad. Subjects and Methods: A total of eighty male students of 12–14-year-old were included in the study. Group A included children having the habit of eating areca nut for 6 months or more, and Group B had children who did not have the habit of areca nut chewing. Children who had just started eating for <6 months were excluded from the study. MMO was calculated as distance from the edge of the upper incisor teeth to the edge of the lower incisor teeth using a calibrated fiber ruler. Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS software version 20.0, with level of significance set at 5%. Results: Mean and standard deviation of MMO for Group A was 3.69 ± 0.5 cm and for Group B was 4.46 ± 0.4 cm. Statistically significant difference was found using Mann–Whitney U-test with U = 239.500 and P = 0.0001. Pearson's coefficient r = −0.623 and P = 0.0001 showed moderate correlation between months of chewing and MMO. The mean duration of chewing was found to be 1.5 years. Conclusion: There is difference in MMO between children chewing areca nut and not chewing it with a moderate correlation between months of eating areca nut and MMO.



Publication History

Article published online:
12 July 2021

© 2016. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Dere K, Choudhry P, Bhaskar V, Ganesh M, Venkataraghvan K, Shah S. Prevalence and characteristics of Areca nut, Gutka and Tobacco among school children of rural areas in and around Gandhinagar. J Adv Oral Res 2014;5:20-5.
  • 2 Khandelwal A, Khandelwal V, Saha MK, Khandelwal S, Prasad S, Saha SG. Prevalence of areca nut chewing in the middle school-going children of Indore, India. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;3:155-7.
  • 3 Sarfraz M, Ali A, Mirza T. Prevalence and characteristics of areca nut chewing habit among school going children in Karachi. J Dow Univ Health Sci Karachi 2014;8:111-16.
  • 4 Karemore TV, Karemore VA. Etiopathogenesis and treatment of oral sub mucosal fibrosis. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2011;23:598-602.
  • 5 Kumar A, Mehta F, Goel M, Dutta S, Hooda A. Maximal mouth opening in Indian children using a new method. J Craniomaxillary Dis 2012;1:79-85.
  • 6 Reddy V, Anjari PV, Banda NR, Reddy P. Oral Sub mucous fibrosis: Correlation of clinical grading to various habit factors. Int J Dent Clin 2011;3:21-4.
  • 7 Nigam NK, Aravinda K, Dhillon M, Gupta S, Reddy S, Srinivas Raju M. Prevalence of oral submucous fibrosis among habitual gutkha and areca nut chewers in Moradabad district. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2014;4:8-13.
  • 8 Gupta VK, Malhotra S, Patil R, Tripathi A. Oral submucous fibrosis at pediatric age, now time to think: Series of two cases. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2013;34:107-10.
  • 9 Jayalakshmi A, Mathew G. The areca nut palm. Kerala: Central Plantation Crops Research Institute; 1982. p. 225-44.
  • 10 Hoffman D, Hecht SS. Advances in tobacco carcinogenesis, smokeless tobacco and betel quid: Control of tobacco related cancers and other diseases. Bombay: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 193-204.
  • 11 Harvey W, Scutt A, Meghji S, Canniff JP. Stimulation of human buccal mucosa fibroblasts in vitro by betel-nut alkaloids. Arch Oral Biol 1986;31:45-9.
  • 12 Murti PR, Bhonsle RB, Gupta PC, Daftary DK, Pindborg JJ, Mehta FS. Etiology of oral submucous fibrosis with special reference to the role of areca nut chewing. J Oral Pathol Med 1995;24:145-52.
  • 13 Rajalalitha P, Vali S. Molecular pathogenesis of oral submucous fibrosis – A collagen metabolic disorder. J Oral Pathol Med 2005;34:321-8.
  • 14 Goel S, Ahmed J, Singh MP, Nahar P. Oral sub mucous fibrosis, a clinico- histopathological comparative study in population of Southern Rajasthan. J Carcinog Mutagen 2010;1:1-4.