CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2016; 37(01): 32-37
DOI: 10.4103/0971-5851.177013
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Trends in management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Influence of insurance based healthcare and treatment compliance on the outcome of adolescents and adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Ravi Arigela
Department of Medical Oncology, Nizam′s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Sadashivudu Gundeti
Department of Medical Oncology, Nizam′s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Ranga Ganta
Department of Medical Oncology, Nizam′s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Srividhya Nasaka
Department of Medical Oncology, Nizam′s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Vijay Linga
Department of Pathology, Centre for Cancer Research, UTHSC, Memphis, TN, India
,
Lakshmi Maddali
Department of Medical Oncology, Nizam′s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
› Author Affiliations
Financial support and sponsorship Nil.

Abstract

Aim: In this study, we attempted to analyze the impact of insurance based health care system and treatment compliance on the outcome of adolescent and adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent treatment for ALL during the period 2003-2011 were enrolled into this retrospective study. Patients on supportive or palliative care only and patients with age <10 years were excluded. The hospital records and tumor registry records were studied. Patients were stratified into two groups, Group A (prior to the introduction of state health insurance [SHI], 2003-2007) and Group B (after the introduction of SHI, 2008-2011). Overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 420 patients with suspected or confirmed ALL visited our center during the study period and 179 patients (87 in Group A and 92 in Group B) were considered for inclusion. The median age in years (range) was 18 (10-57) and 18 (10-58) respectively in Groups A and B with males more than females. Median OS (95% CI) was 9 (6.7-11.2) and 12 (7.3-16.7) months in the Groups A and B respectively (P = 0.265). Poor treatment compliance in both groups was high (36% in Group A and 41% in Group B, [P = 0.107]) with lower default rates in Group B (P = 0.019). Patients with good compliance in the total study population and the individual study groups had significantly better OS. Conclusions: Insurance based health care has improved outcomes in the present study but not compliance to treatment. Significantly better OS was observed in patients with good compliance.



Publication History

Article published online:
12 July 2021

© 2016. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Smith M, Arthur D, Camitta B, Carroll AJ, Crist W, Gaynon P, et al. Uniform approach to risk classification and treatment assignment for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:18-24.
  • 2 NCRP - Consolidated Report of Population Based Cancer Registries 2009-2011. National Cancer Registry Programme, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bangalore, India; 2014. Available from: http://www.ncrpindia.org/ALL_NCRP_REPORTS/PBCR_REPORT_2009_2011/ALL_CONTENT/Printed_Version.htm. [Last accessed on 2015 Feb 10].
  • 3 Kulkarni KP, Marwaha RK, Trehan A, Bansal D. Survival outcome in childhood ALL: Experience from a tertiary care centre in North India. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2009;53:168-73.
  • 4 Advani S, Pai S, Venzon D, Adde M, Kurkure PK, Nair CN, et al. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in India: An analysis of prognostic factors using a single treatment regimen. Ann Oncol 1999;10:167-76.
  • 5 Marwaha RK, Kulkarni KP, Bansal D, Trehan A. Pattern of mortality in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Experience from a single center in northern India. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2010;32:366-9.
  • 6 Magrath I, Shanta V, Advani S, Adde M, Arya LS, Banavali S, et al. Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in countries with limited resources; lessons from use of a single protocol in India over a twenty year period [corrected]. Eur J Cancer 2005;41:1570-83.
  • 7 Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J, Flandrin G, Muller-Hermelink HK, Vardiman J, et al. The World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting, Airlie House, Virginia, November, 1997. Ann Oncol 1999;10:1419-32.
  • 8 Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982;5:649-55.
  • 9 Gullipali M, Linga VG, Kota R, Iyer KK, Ganta RR, Nasaka SV, et al. Current Refusal/Dropout Rates in Paediatric Oncology-Institutional Experience[abstract]. In: SIOP 2013 scientific programme+Index. 45 th Congress of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP). 2013 September 25-28; Hongkong, China; p. 0411.
  • 10 Reiter A, Schrappe M, Ludwig WD, Hiddemann W, Sauter S, Henze G, et al. Chemotherapy in 998 unselected childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Results and conclusions of the multicenter trial ALL-BFM 86. Blood 1994;84:3122-33.
  • 11 Larson RA, Dodge RK, Burns CP, Lee EJ, Stone RM, Schulman P, et al. A five-drug remission induction regimen with intensive consolidation for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Cancer and leukemia group B study 8811. Blood 1995;85:2025-37.
  • 12 Brüggemann M, Raff T, Flohr T, Gökbuget N, Nakao M, Droese J, et al. Clinical significance of minimal residual disease quantification in adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2006;107:1116-23.
  • 13 Gökbuget N, Raff R, Brügge-Mann M, Flohr T, Scheuring U, Pfeifer H, et al. Risk/MRD adapted GMALL trials in adult ALL. Ann Hematol 2004;83 (Suppl 1):S129-31.
  • 14 Annino L, Vegna ML, Camera A, Specchia G, Visani G, Fioritoni G, et al. Treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): Long-term follow-up of the GIMEMA ALL 0288 randomized study. Blood 2002;99:863-71.
  • 15 Pulte D, Redaniel MT, Jansen L, Brenner H, Jeffreys M. Recent trends in survival of adult patients with acute leukemia: Overall improvements, but persistent and partly increasing disparity in survival of patients from minority groups. Haematologica 2013;98:222-9.
  • 16 Bajel A, George B, Mathews V, Viswabandya A, Kavitha ML, Srivastava A, et al. Adult ALL: Treatment outcome and prognostic factors in an Indian population using a modified German ALL (GMALL) protocol. Leukemia 2007;21:2230-3.
  • 17 Raje N, Pai S, Vaidya S, Gopal R, Parikh P, Saikia T, et al. Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Results of an aggressive regimen in India. Leuk Lymphoma 1994;14:285-90.