CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2014; 35(04): 267-270
DOI: 10.4103/0971-5851.144987
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Morphometric evaluation and clinical correlations in pediatric malignant small round cell tumors

Cherry Bansal
Department of Pathology, Era′s Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Archana Gupta
Department of Pathology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Archana Kumar
Department of Pediatrics, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Anand Srivastava
Department of Pathology, Era′s Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Aims: Nuclear size increases in malignant tumors and reflects DNA content, ploidy and proliferation index. Present study investigated if the nuclear morphometry could differentiate histomorphologically similar paediatric malignant small round cell tumors on hematoxylin and eosin stained sections for diagnostics in a resource poor setting. Settings and Design: All the consecutive malignant pediatric tumors received in Pathology Department from other faculties of King George′s Medical University and also those referred directly to Pathology Department from other hospitals of city/other cities during 3 years period were recorded. Materials and Methods: Morphometric analysis was done in 22 confirmed (by higher ancillary techniques) but histomorphologically difficult to differentiate round cell tumors. All sections were analyzed by cell images from six different areas, using Leica Q win 500 images software. Results: Nuclear measurements were obtained for retinoblastoma (RB) (nine cases), neuroblastoma (five cases), Wilms tumor (WT) (three cases), rhabdomyosarcoma (three cases), malignant hemangiopericytoma (one case) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (one case). Among the RBs, maximum mean nuclear area percent (24.93) was seen in a case with nerve involvement and metastasis, followed by cases with only nerve involvement (21.60) and smallest area (16.57) was in non-nerve involving, nonmetastatic cases. All five cases of neuroblastoma had almost similar mean nuclear area percent (18.05-18.29). WT case with metastasis had higher nuclear area (21.25) than nonmetastatic (19.47). Amongst all the tumors, minimum value (14.93) was seen in malignant hemangiopericytoma. Conclusion: Morphometric evaluation in paediatric malignant round cell tumors have generated useful data, and needs further multicentric confirmation for implementation.



Publication History

Article published online:
19 July 2021

© 2014. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Variend S. Small cell tumours in childhood: A review. J Pathol 1985;145:1-25.
  • 2 Carter RL, McCarthy KP. Divergent differentiation in round-cell tumours of soft tissues: An interim appraisal. Histopathology 1993;23:93-7.
  • 3 Kocjan G. Diagnostic dilemmas in FNAC cytology: Small round cell tumors. In: Schroder G, editor. Fine needle aspiration cytology diagnostic principles and dilemmas. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 133-4.
  • 4 Akhtar M, Iqbal MA, Mourad W, Ali MA. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of small round cell tumors of childhood: A comprehensive approach. Diagn Cytopathol 1999;21:81-91.
  • 5 Radhika S, Bakshi A, Rajwanshi A, Nijhawan R, Das A, Kakkar N, et al. Cytopathology of uncommon malignant renal neoplasms in the pediatric age group. Diagn Cytopathol 2005;32:281-6.
  • 6 Saleh H, Masood S. Value of ancillary studies in fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol 1995;13:310-5.
  • 7 Brahmi U, Rajwanshi A, Joshi K, Dey P, Vohra H, Ganguly NK, et al. Flow cytometric immunophenotyping and comparison with immunocytochemistry in small round cell tumors. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2001;23:405-12.
  • 8 Leon ME, Hou JS, Galindo LM, Garcia FU. Fine-needle aspiration of adult small-round-cell tumors studied with flow cytometry. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;31:147-54.
  • 9 Akhtar M, Ali MA, Sabbah R, Bakry M, Nash JE. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of round cell malignant tumors of childhood. A combined light and electron microscopic approach. Cancer 1985;55:1805-17.
  • 10 Brahmi U, Rajwanshi A, Joshi K, Dey P, Vohra H, Ganguly NK, et al. Automated nuclear image morphometry on fine needle aspiration smears of malignant round cell tumors. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2001;23:287-90.
  • 11 Bayani J, Thorner P, Zielenska M, Pandita A, Beatty B, Squire JA. Application of a simplified comparative genomic hybridization technique to screen for gene amplification in pediatric solid tumors. Pediatr Pathol Lab Med 1995;15:831-44.
  • 12 Peter M, Gilbert E, Delattre O. A multiplex real-time PCR assay for the detection of gene fusions observed in solid tumors. Lab Invest 2001;81:905-12.
  • 13 Thorner PS, Squire JA. Molecular genetics in the diagnosis and prognosis of solid pediatric tumors. Pediatr Dev Pathol 1998;1:337-65.
  • 14 Collan Y. Morphometry in pathology: Another look at diagnostic histopathology. Pathol Res Pract 1984;179:189-92.
  • 15 Marchevsky AM, Gil J. Applications of computerized interactive morphometry in pathology. II. A model for computer generated diagnosis. Lab Invest 1986;54:708-16.
  • 16 Rahman SM, Itakura H. Morphometry in histopathology. An image analysis workstation for the pathology laboratory. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1996;18:471-80.
  • 17 Hamilton PW, Allen DC. Morphometry in histopathology. J Pathol 1995;175:369-79.
  • 18 Søreide K, Nedrebø BS, Reite A, Thorsen K, Kørner H. Endoscopy, morphology, morphometry and molecular markers: Predicting cancer risk in colorectal adenoma. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2009;9:125-37.
  • 19 Tan PH, Goh BB, Chiang G, Bay BH. Correlation of nuclear morphometry with pathologic parameters in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Mod Pathol 2001;14:937-41.
  • 20 Rajesh L, Pattari SK, Garewal G, Dey P, Srinivasan R. Image morphometry of acute leukemias. Comparison between lymphoid and myeloid subtypes. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2004;26:57-60.
  • 21 Gautam U, Srinivasan R, Rajwanshi A, Bansal D, Marwaha RK. Comparative evaluation of flow-cytometric immunophenotyping and immunocytochemistry in the categorization of malignant small round cell tumors in fine-needle aspiration cytologic specimens. Cancer 2008;114:494-503.
  • 22 Ravindra S, Kini U. Cytomorphology and morphometry of small round-cell tumors in the region of the kidney. Diagn Cytopathol 2005;32:211-6.
  • 23 Kazanowska B, Jelen M, Reich A, Tarnawski W, Chybicka A. The role of nuclear morphometry in prediction of prognosis for rhabdomyosarcoma in children. Histopathology 2004;45:352-9.
  • 24 Oda Y, Tsuneyoshi M. A comparative study of nuclear morphometry and proliferating activity in neuroectodermal tumors of bone and Ewing′s sarcoma of bone. Gen Diagn Pathol 1995;141:121-9.
  • 25 Machado I, Ruiz-Sauri A, López-Guerrero JA, Llombart-Bosch A. Morphometric analysis of DNA ploidy and nuclear cell cycle regulators in Ewing′s sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2011;33:101-10.
  • 26 Callaghan RC, Carda C, Peydró-Olaya A, Triche T, Llombart-Bosch A. Small round cell tumors of bone and soft tissue. A morphometric and stereometric comparative analysis of 119 cases. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1995;17:374-82.
  • 27 Ushigome S, Shimoda T, Nikaido T, Nakamori K, Miyazawa Y, Shishikura A, et al. Primitive neuroectodermal tumors of bone and soft tissue. With reference to histologic differentiation in primary or metastatic foci. Acta Pathol Jpn 1992;42:483-93.
  • 28 Theissen J, Boensch M, Spitz R, Betts D, Stegmaier S, Christiansen H, et al. Heterogeneity of the MYCN oncogene in neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:2085-90.