CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2012; 22(01): 40-46
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.95403
Cardiac Radiology

Pictorial essay: Non-coronary applications of cardiac CT

Prabhakar Rajiah
Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Recent advances in scanner technology have enabled computed tomography (CT) scan to evolve into a valuable tool in the noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Due to its high negative predictive value, CT can act as a gatekeeper, determining which patients require cardiac catheterization. Although mainly used for the evaluation of coronary artery disease, cardiac CT is also useful in the evaluation of various non-coronary cardiac conditions involving the pericardium, pulmonary veins, and the coronary veins and valves, as well as in the assessment of cardiomyopathies, masses, and ventricular and valvular function. This review discusses and illustrates the various non-coronary applications of cardiac CT.



Publication History

Article published online:
30 July 2021

© 2012. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F, Burgstahler C, Cademartiri F, de Feyter P, et al. Cardiac computed tomography: Indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: Report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2008;29:531-56.
  • 2 Cronin P, Sneider MB, Kazerooni EA, Kelly AM, Scharf C, Oral H, et al. MDCT of the left atrium and pulmonary veins in planning radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: A how-to guide. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:767-78.
  • 3 Maksimovic R, Dill T, Ristic AD, Seferovic PM. Imaging in percutaneous ablation for atrial fibrillation. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2491-504.
  • 4 Martinek M, Nesser HJ, Aichinger J, Boehm G, Purerfellner H. Impact of integration of multislice computed tomography imaging into three dimensional electroanatomic mapping in clinical outcomes, safely and efficacy using radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007;30:1215-23.
  • 5 Daoud EG, Hummel JD, Houmsse M, Hart DT, Weiss R, Liu Z, et al. Comparison of computed tomographic imaging with intraprocedural contrast esophagogram. Implications for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2008;5:975-80.
  • 6 Van de Veire NR, Schuijf JD, De Sutter J, Schuijf JD, Bleeker GB, Wijffels MC, et al. Non invasive visualization of the cardiac venous system in coronary artery disease patients using 64 slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1832-8.
  • 7 Boonyasirinant T, Rajiah P, Schoenhagen P, Halliburton SS, Flamm SD. Relationship of coronay sinus tributaries with myocardial infarction in ischemic versus non ischemic cardiomyopathy; A comprehensive MDCT assessment with implications for cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009;3:S23-4.
  • 8 Kim DH, Choi S, Choi JA, Chang JH, Choi DJ, Lim C, et al. Various findings of cardiac thrombi on MDCT and MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30:572-7.
  • 9 Rajiah P, Kanne JP, Kalahasti V, Schoenhagen P. Computed tomography of cardiac and paracardiac masses. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5:16-29.
  • 10 Spevak PJ, Johnson PT, Fishman EK. Surgically corrected congenital heart disease: Utility of 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:854-61.
  • 11 Tops LF, Krishnan SC, Schuijf JD, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. Noncoronary applicatiosn of cardiac multidetector row tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 2008;1:94-106.
  • 12 Morgan-Hughes GJ, Owens PE, Roobottom CA, Marshall AJ. Three dimensional volume quantification of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography. Heart 2003;89:1191-4.
  • 13 Feuchtner GM, Müller S, Bonatti J, Schachner T, Velik-Salchner C, Pachinger O, et al. Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:197-203.
  • 14 Abbara S, Soni AV, Cury RC. Evaluation of cardiac function and valves by multidetector row computed tomography. Semin Roentgenol 2008;43:145-53.
  • 15 Henneman MM, Bax JJ, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, Holman ER, Stokkel MP, et al. Global and regional left ventriclular function: A comparison between gated SPECT, 2D echocardiography and multi-slice computed tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:1452-60.
  • 16 Williams TJ, Manghat NE, McKay-Ferguson A, Ring NJ, Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA. Cardiomyopathy: Appearances on ECG-gated 64-detector row computed tomography. Clin Radiol 2008;63:464-74.
  • 17 Restrepo CS, Lemos DF, Lemos JA, Velasquez E, Diethelm L, Ovella TA, et al. Imaging findings in cardiac tamponade with emphasis on CT. Radiographics 2007;27:1595-610.
  • 18 Wang ZJ, Reddy GP, Gotway MB, Yeh BM, Hetts SW, Higgins CB. CT and MR imaging of pericardial disease. Radiographics 2003;23 Spec No:S167-80.
  • 19 Rajiah P, Kanne JP. Computed tomography of pericardium and pericardial abnormalities. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2010;4:3-18.