Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2010; 20(01): 20-25
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.59747
Obstetric Imaging

Color doppler evaluation of cerebral-umbilical pulsatility ratio and its usefulness in the diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation and prediction of adverse perinatal outcome

Shahina Bano
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and PGIMER, New Delhi - 110 001, India
,
Vikas Chaudhary
Lady Hardinge Medical College and associated Hospitals, New Delhi - 110 001, India
,
Sanjay Pande
N.S.C.B. Medical College and Hospital, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh - 482 003, India
,
VL Mehta
N.S.C.B. Medical College and Hospital, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh - 482 003, India
,
AK Sharma
N.S.C.B. Medical College and Hospital, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh - 482 003, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of the pulsatility index (PI) of the umbilical artery (UA) and that of the fetal middle cerebral artery (MCA), as well as the ratio of the MCA PI to the UA PI (C/U ratio), in the diagnosis of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses and in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Materials and Methods: The study population comprised 90 pregnancies of 30-41 weeks gestation that had been diagnosed clinically as intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) over a period of 1 year. The UA PI and the MCA PI as well as the C/U ratio were calculated. Results: Of the 90 pregnancies in the study, 24 showed abnormal UA PI. Among these, 21 (87.5%) were SGA and 19 (79.2%) had adverse perinatal outcome. Of the four of the 90 pregnancies that showed abnormal MCA PI, all were SGA and had adverse perinatal outcome. Similarly, of the 20 out of 90 pregnancies that showed abnormal C/U ratio (< 1.08), all 20 (100%) were SGA and had adverse perinatal outcome. The results were correlated with parameters of fetal outcome. Conclusion: Inferences drawn from the study were: (1) The C/U ratio is a better predictor of SGA fetuses and adverse perinatal outcome than the MCA PI or the UA PI used alone, (2) The UA PI can be used to identify IUGR per se and (3) The MCA PI alone is not a reliable indicator for predicting fetal distress.

Keywords

Intrauterine growth retardation - pulsatility index - umbilical artery pulsatility index - middle cerebral artery pulsatility index - middle cerebral artery to umbilical artery pulsatility index ratio


Publication History

Article published online:
02 August 2021

© 2010. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Fleischer A, Schulman H, Farmakides G, Bracero L, Blattner P, Randolph G. Umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:502-5.
  • 2 Gramellini D, Folli MC, Raboni S, Vadora E, Merialdi A. et al. Cerebral umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. Cerebral and umbilical ratio: Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:416-20.
  • 3 Schulman H, Fleischer A, Stern W, Farmakides G, Jagani N, Blattner P. et al. umbilical wave ratios in human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;148:985-90.
  • 4 Giles WB, Trudinger BJ, Baird PJ. Fetal umbilical flow velocity waveform and placental resistance pathological correlation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:31-8.
  • 5 Tatjana Reihs, Matthias Hofer. Obstetrics and gynecology. In: Matthias Hofer, editor. Teaching Manual of Color Duplex Sonography. 2 nd ed. New York: Thieme 2004.pp. 61-72.
  • 6 Quaranta P, Currell R, Redman CW, Robinson JS. Prediction of small-for-dates infants by measurement of symphysis-fundal height. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1981;88:115-9.
  • 7 Chang TC, Robson SC, Boys RJ, Spencer JA. Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: Which ultrasonic measurement is best? Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:1030-8.
  • 8 Warsof SL, Cooper DJ, Little D, Campbell S. Routine ultrasound screening for antenatal detection of intrauterine growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:33-9.
  • 9 Afzal A, Nasreen K. Biophysical score in high risk pregnancy. Prof Med J 2006;13:362-9.
  • 10 Chauhan SP, Sanderson M, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, Devoe LD. Perinatal outcome and amniotic fluid index in the antepartum and intrapartum periods: A meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1473-8.
  • 11 Forfar J, Mclntosh N, Arneil GC, et al. Forfar and Arneil text book of pediatrics. Google book result 2003. p. 167-8.
  • 12 Yoon BH, Romero R, Roh CR, Kim SH, Ager JW, Syn HC, et al. Relationship between the fetal biophysical profile score, umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry, and fetal blood acid-base status determined by cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:1586-94.
  • 13 Gonzalez JM, Stamilio DM, Ural S, Macones GA, Odibo AO. Relationship between abnormal fetal testing and adverse perinatal outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:48-51.
  • 14 Padmagirison R, Rai L. Fetal doppler versus NST as predictors of adverse perinatal outcome in severe preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;56:134-8.