Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2008; 18(03): 204-209
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.41828
Computers in Radiology

Impact of computers in radiography: The advent of digital radiography, Part-2

BS Verma
Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Army Hospital (Research and Referral), Delhi Cantt. - 110 010, India
,
IK Indrajit
Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Army Hospital (Research and Referral), Delhi Cantt. - 110 010, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

Keywords

Digital radiography - CR - DR - Flat panel detector - Tomosynthesis - Computer-aided diagnosis - Mobile DR


Publication History

Article published online:
31 July 2021

© 2008. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Verma BS, Indrajit IK. Advent of digital radiography: Part 1. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2008;18:113-6.
  • 2 Seibert JA. Overview of Digital Detector Technology, University of California, Davis Available from: http://www.aapm.org/meetings/05AM/pdf/18-2623-22086-53.pdf. [last accessed on 2008 Feb 4].
  • 3 Aarati A. Is CR dead? Imaging Management 2007;7:2-4. Available from: http://www.imagingmanagement.org. [last accessed on 2007 Feb 1].
  • 4 Padovani R. Basic Principle of Flat Panel Imaging Detectors 2006. Available from: http://www.dimond3.org/Trier_2006/Basic%20principles%20of%20flat%20panel.pdf. [last accessed on 2008 Feb 6].
  • 5 The challenges of direct digital X-ray detectors. A review of digital detectors in medical X-ray technology. Available from: http://www.dondickson.co.uk/download/Challenges_of_Direct_Digital_Radiology.pdf. [last accessed on 2008 Feb 9].
  • 6 Chabbal J, Arques M, Peyret O. Flat panel X-ray detector. Available from: http://beaune.in2p3.fr/sessions/chabbal.pdf. [last accessed on 2008 Feb 9].
  • 7 Chotas H, Dobbins J, Ravin C. Principles of digital radiography with large area electronically readable detectors: A review of basics. Radiology 1999;210:595e9.
  • 8 Paulus DD. Xeroradiography: An in-depth review. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1980;12:309-84.
  • 9 Smith AP. Fundamentals of digital mammography. Physics, technology and practical considerations. Available from: http://www.hologic.com/oem/pdf/R-BI-016_Fund-Dig%20Mammo.pdf. [last accessed on 2008 Apr 28].
  • 10 Bruijns T, Stueve D. Image quality assessment in digital X-ray detection systems Philips medical systems. Available from: http://www.aapm.org/meetings/04SS/documents/bruijns.PDF. [last accessed on 2008 Feb 1].
  • 11 Yester M. An overview of digital imaging systems for radiography and fluoroscopy, Ph.D. University of Alabama at Birmingham. Available from: http://www.aapm.org/meetings/04SS/documents/yester.PDF. [last accessed on 2008 Feb 3].
  • 12 Lodox Systems. Available from: http://www.lodox.com/html/-product.html. [last accessed on 2008 May 3].
  • 13 Beningfield S, Potgieter H, Nicol A, van As S, Bowie G, Hering E, et al . Report on a new type of trauma full-body digital X-ray machine. Emerg Radiol 2003;10:23-9.
  • 14 Flynn M. Technical advances in CR and DR Part 2. Available from: http://www.imagingeconomics.com/issues/articles/2004-04_16.asp. [last accessed on 2008 Apr 25].
  • 15 Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM. Digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:616-23.
  • 16 Smith R. DR and CR, Today and Tomorrow Dec 2004. Available from: http://www.imagingeconomics.com/issues/articles/2004-12_05.asp. [last accessed on 2008 Apr 14].
  • 17 Cho KH, Freckleton MW. Digital radiography for the field: A portable prototype. J Digit Imaging 2002;5:194-7.
  • 18 Pixium Product documentation. Available from: http://www.trixell.com/html-gb/products/interne/product_documentation.html.
  • 19 Seibert JA. Digital radiography: CR versus DR? Time to reconsider the options, definitions, and current capabilities. Available at http://www.fujimed.com/products-services/imaging-systems/digital-xray/doc/AR_12-07_Fuji_Seibert.pdf. [last accessed on 2008 Apr 28].
  • 20 Konica Minolta′s CR systems shine at RSNA. Available from: http://www.healthimaging.com/content/view/9120/89/. [last accessed on 2008 Apr 26].
  • 21 Romlein J. CR versus DR: Blurred lines of distinction. Available from: http://www.fujimed.com/products-services/imaging-systems/digital-xray/doc/AR_12-07_Fuji_Romlein.pdf. [last -accessed on 2008 Apr 28].
  • 22 Wideman C, Gallet J. Analog to digital workflow improvement: A quantitative study. J Digit Imaging 2006;19:29-34.
  • 23 Andriole KP, Luth DP, Gould RG. Workflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environment. J Digit Imaging 2002;5:124-6.