Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2016; 49(03): 390-396
DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.197227
Ideas and Innovations
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Innovative modified hair follicle harvesting technique with reverse rake scalp elevator for lower occipital donor area in follicular unit extraction hair transplantation

Chandrakant Rambhau Gharwade
Department of Plastic Surgery, Grant Government Medical College and Sir J. J. Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 August 2019 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Follicular unit extraction (FUE) is one of the widely practiced minimally invasive follicular harvesting techniques employed during hair transplantation. FUE technique has an advantage of utilising lower occipital area and supra-auricular region as a safe donor area described by Unger, in addition to the standard occipital donor area used in strip method (follicular unit transplant). Despite its potential advantages such as rapid recovery, minimal scarring and reduced post-operative pain; its widespread acceptance is limited due to various factors in variable contribution like steeper learning curve and potentially higher follicular transection rates (FTRs). The main practical drawbacks in harvesting FUE from lower occipital donor region that lie inferior to the standard donor area, is its acute angle (10°–15°) of emergent hair from scalp skin, higher variance angle (15°–35°) between hairs below the skin and hair exit angle above the skin and comparatively loose scalp, preventing to provide stable platform for punching. Hair transplant surgeon faces difficulty in aligning and engaging the FUE punch leading to very high hair follicle transection rate, and therefore, it is not a preferred site for harvesting follicles in FUE. Authors description of modified technique using reverse rake scalp elevator helps in negating the acute angle of the hair follicles exit from scalp skin and reducing the variance angle between emergent hair and hair below the skin in lower occipital region thereby reducing FTR. Furthermore, an added advantage of reducing the overall operative time and surgeon fatigue, improve donor area healing, availability of a comparatively larger donor area which increases the confidence of the beginners. This method will be of help as it is easy to duplicate and follow by novice hair transplant surgeons and also for those who are routinely doing mega hair transplants sessions.

KEY WORDS

Hair follicle harvesting - Follicular unit extraction - hair transplantation - reverse rake scalp elevator
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Orentreich N. Autografts in alopecias and other selected dermatological conditions. Ann NY Acad Sci 1959; 83: 463-79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Unger W. Delineating the safe donor area for hair transplanting. J Am Acad Cosmet Surg 1994; 4: 239-43
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Burke KE. Hair loss. What causes it and what can be done about it. Postgrad Med 1989; 85: 52-8 67-73, 77
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Bicknell LM, Kash N, Kavouspour C, Rashid RM. Follicular unit extraction hair transplant harvest: A review of current recommendations and future considerations. Dermatol Online J 2014; 20: pii Doj_21754
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Williams Jr KL. Current practices and controversies in cosmetic hair restoration. Dermatol Surg 2013; 39: 797-801
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rassman WR, Bernstein R. Hair Loss and Replacement for Dummies. Indiana: Wiley Publish Inc; 2008: p. 201
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Dua A, Dua K. Follicular unit extraction hair transplant. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2010; 3: 76-81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Harris JA. The safe system: New instrumentation and methodology to improve follicular unit extraction (FUE). Hair Transplant Forum Int 2004; 14: 162-4
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Bernstein RM, Rassman WR, Anderson KW. FUE Megassions: Evolution of a technique. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2004; 14: 97-9
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Rassman W, Pak J, Kim J. 2016; Follicular Unit Extraction: Evolution of a Technology. J Transplant Technol Res 6: 158 doi: 10.4172/2161-0991.1000158
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Harris J. Conventional FUE in hair transplantation. In: Unger W, Shapiro R, Unger R, Unger M. Eds London: Informa Healthcare; 2011: p. 291-6
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Gho CG, Martino Neumann HA. Donor hair follicle preservation by partial follicular unit extraction. A method to optimize hair transplantation. J Dermatolog Treat 2010; 21: 337-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Knudsen RG. The donor area. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2004; 12: 233-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rassman WR, Carson S. Micrografting in extensive quantities. The ideal hair restoration procedure. Dermatol Surg 1995; 21: 306-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Barusco MN. The no shave technique for FUE. Hair Transplant 360 Degree Vol. 3. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers ltd.; 2014: p. 238
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Zontos G. How the Outgrowth Angle of the Hair Follicles Influences the Donor Area Injury Using FUE – A Mathematical Approach to the Problem. Available from http://www.haarklinikken.dk/cgi-files/mdmgfx/file-896-418802-25165.pdf [Last accessed on 2014 Oct]
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Bertram NG, Damkemg P. Follicular unit extraction: Experience in Chinese population. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2009; 19: 14 Available from: http://www.forhair.com/pdfs/CIT%20 info.pdf [Last accessed on 2010 Jan 2015]
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Yamamoto K. Intra-operative monitoring of the follicular transection rate in follicular unit extraction. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2008; 18: 175
    Google Scholar