The use of genotoxicity biomarkers in molecular epidemiology: applications in environmental, occupational and dietary studies

Abstract

Molecular epidemiology is an approach increasingly used in the establishment of associations between exposure to hazardous substances and development of disease, including the possible modulation by genetic susceptibility factors. Environmental chemicals and contaminants from anthropogenic pollution of air, water and soil, but also originating specifically in occupational contexts, are potential sources of risk of development of disease. Also, diet presents an important role in this process, with some well characterized associations existing between nutrition and some types of cancer. Genotoxicity biomarkers allow the detection of early effects that result from the interaction between the individual and the environment; they are therefore important tools in cancer epidemiology and are extensively used in human biomonitoring studies. This work intends to give an overview of the potential for genotoxic effects assessment, specifically with the cytokinesis blocked micronucleus assay and comet assay in environmental and occupational scenarios, including diet. The plasticity of these techniques allows their inclusion in human biomonitoring studies, adding important information with the ultimate aim of disease prevention, in particular cancer, and so it is important that they be included as genotoxicity assays in molecular epidemiology.

Keywords

molecular epidemiology - biomarkers - genotoxicity - micronuclei - comet assay - environment - occupation - diet

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 13. März 2017

Angenommen: 30. Juni 2017

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
10. Mai 2021

• References

• 1 Boffetta P, Nyberg F. Contribution of environmental factors to cancer risk. Br Med Bull 2003; 68: 71-94
• 2 Cancer Research UK, Cancer risk in the workplace. Cancer Research UK, 2016. Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/causes-of-cancer/cancer-risks-in-the-workplace
• 3 Ladeira C, Gomes MC, Brito M. Human nutrition, DNA damage and cancer: a review. Mutagenesis: Exploring Novel Genes and Pathways. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2014: 73-104
• 4 Key JT, Schatzkin A, Willett CW. et al. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of cancer. Public Health Nutr 2004; 7: 187-200
• 5 Perera FP, Weinstein IB. Molecular epidemiology: recent advances and future directions. Carcinogenesis 2000; 21: 517-524
• 6 Portier CJ, Bell DA. Genetic susceptibility: significance in risk assessment. Toxicol Lett 1998; 28: 185-189
• 7 Vainio H. Use of biomarkers—new frontiers in occupational toxicology and epidemiology. Toxicol Lett 1998; 102-103: 581-589
• 8 Bartsch H. Studies on biomarkers in cancer etiology and prevention: a summary and challenge of 20 years of interdisciplinary research. Mutat Res, Rev Mutat Res 2000; 462: 255-279
• 9 Dusinska M, Collins AR. The comet assay in human biomonitoring: gene–environment interactions. Mutagenesis 2008; 23: 191-205
• 10 Perera FP. Molecular epidemiology: insights into cancer susceptibility, risk assessment, and prevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88: 496-509
• 11 Au WW. Usefulness of biomarkers in population studies: From exposure to susceptibility and to prediction of cancer. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2007; 210: 239-246
• 12 El-Zein R, Vral A, Etzel CJ. et al. Cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay and cancer risk assessment. Mutagenesis 2011; 26: 101-106
• 13 Husgafvel-Pursiainen K. Molecular biomarkers in studies on environmental cancer. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56 (10) 730-731
• 14 Perera FP. Molecular epidemiology: On the path to prevention?. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 602-612
• 15 Goldstein B, Gibson J, Henderson R. et al. Biological markers in environmental health research. Environ Health Perspect 1987; 74: 3-9
• 16 Fergurson L. Biomarkers as endpoints in intervention studies. Wild C., Vineis P., Garte S. Author, Molecular Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2008: 255-266
• 17 Schulte P, Mazzuckelli LF. Validation of biological markers for quantitative risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 1991; 90: 239-246
• 18 Davis CD, Milner JA. Biomarkers for diet and cancer prevention research: potentials and challenges. Acta pharmacol Sin 2007; 28: 1262-1273
• 19 US Congress. 1990 Genetic monitoring and screening in the workplace. Office of Technology Assessment.
• 20 Barrett JC, Vainio H, Peakall D. et al. 12th meeting of the scientific group on methodologies for the safety evaluation of chemicals: susceptibility to environmental hazards. Environ Health Perspect 1997; 105: 699-737
• 21 Ladeira C, Viegas S. Human biomonitoring—An overview on biomarkers and their application in occupational and environmental health. Biomonitoring 2016; 3: 15-24
• 22 Battershill JM, Burnett K, Bull S. Factors affecting the incidence of genotoxicity biomarkers in peripheral blood lymphocytes: impact on design of biomonitoring studies. Mutagenesis 2008; 23: 423-437
• 23 Knudsen LE, Hansen AM. Biomarkers of intermediate endpoints in environmental and occupational health. Int J Hygiene Environ Health 2007; 210: 461-470
• 24 Cavallo D, Ursini CL, Rondinone B. et al. Evaluation of a suitable DNA damage biomarker for human biomonitoring of exposed workers. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 2009; 50 (09) 781-790
• 25 Fenech M, Crott J, Turner J. et al. Necrosis, apoptosis, cytostasis and DNA damage in human lymphocytes measured simultaneously within the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay: description of the method and results for hydrogen peroxide. Mutagenesis 1999; 14: 605-612
• 26 Majer BJ, Laky B, KnasmÜller S. et al. Use of the micronucleus assay with exfoliated epithelial cells as a biomarker for monitoring individuals at elevated risk of genetic damage and in chemoprevention trials. Mutat Res 2001; 489: 147-172
• 27 Burgaz S, Erdem O, Cakmak G. et al. Cytogenetic analysis of buccal cells from shoe-workers and pathology and anatomy laboratory workers exposed to n-hexane, toluene, methyl ethyl ketone and formaldehyde. Biomarkers 2002; 7: 151-161
• 28 Proia NK. Smoking and smokeless tobacco-associated human buccal cell mutations and their association with oral cancer—A Review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15: 1061-1077
• 29 Fenech M. Cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay. Nat Protoc 2007; 2: 1084-1104
• 30 Holland N, Bolognesi C, Kirschvolders M. et al. The micronucleus assay in human buccal cells as a tool for biomonitoring DNA damage: The HUMN project perspective on current status and knowledge gaps. Mutat Res 2008; 659: 93-108
• 31 Thomas P, Fenech M. Buccal micronucleus cytome assay. Methods Mol Biol 2011; 682: 235-248
• 32 Cerqueira EMM, Meireles JRC. The use of the micronucleus test to monitoring individuals at risk for oral cancer. The Research and Biology of Cancer. Hong Kong: Icon Press Ltd; 2012: 1-26
• 33 Kashyap B, Reddy PS. Micronuclei assay of exfoliated oral buccal cells: means to assess the nuclear abnormalities in different diseases. J Cancer Res Ther 2012; 8: 184-191
• 34 GÖethel G, Brucker N, Moro AM. et al. Evaluation of genotoxicity in workers exposed to benzene and atmospheric pollutants. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2014; 770: 61-65
• 35 Fenech M. The advantages and disadvantages of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus method. Mutat Res 1997; 392: 11-18
• 36 Fenech M. The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutat Res 2000; 455: 81-95
• 37 Fenech M, Crott JW. Micronuclei, nucleoplasmic bridges and nuclear buds induced in folic acid deficient human lymphocytes-evidence for breakage-fusion-bridge cycles in the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Mutat Res 2002; 504: 131-136
• 38 Mateuca R, Lombaert N, Aka PV. et al. Chromosomal changes: induction, detection methods and applicability in human biomonitoring. Biochimie 2006; 88: 1515-1531
• 39 Fenech M. Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay evolves into a ‘cytome’ assay of chromosomal instability, mitotic dysfunction and cell death. Mutat Res 2006; 600: 58-66
• 40 Fenech M, Kirsch-Volders M, Natarajan AT. et al. Molecular mechanisms of micronucleus, nucleoplasmic bridge and nuclear bud formation in mammalian and human cells. Mutagenesis 2011; 26: 125-132
• 41 Speit G. Does the recommended lymphocyte cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay forhuman biomonitoring actually detect DNA damage induced by occupational and environmental exposure to genotoxic chemicals?. Mutagenesis 2013; 28: 375-380
• 42 Moller P, Knudsen LE, Loft S. et al. The comet assay as a rapid test in biomonitoring occupational exposure to DNA-damaging agents and effect of confounding factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000; 9: 1005-1015
• 43 Collins A, Dusinska M. Applications of the comet assay in human biomonitoring. Dhawan A., Anderson D. The Comet Assay in Toxicology. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2009: 201-202
• 44 Collins AR. The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations. Molecular Biotechnol 2004; 26: 249-261
• 45 Collins AR. Investigating oxidative DNA damage and its repair using the comet assay. Mutat Res 2009; 681: 24-32
• 46 Azqueta A. Detection of oxidised DNA using DNA repair enzymes. Dhawan A., Anderson D. The Comet Assay in Toxicology. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2009: 58-63
• 47 Valverde M, Rojas E. Environmental and occupational biomonitoring using the comet assay. Mutat Res 2009; 681: 93-109
• 48 Valverde M, Rojas E. The comet assay in human biomonitoring. Dhawan A., Anderson D.. The Comet Assay in Toxicology. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2009: 227-251
• 49 Digue L, OrsiÈre T, De MÉo M. et al. Evaluation of the genotoxic activity of paclitaxel by the in vitro micronucleus test in combination with fluorescent in situ hybridization of a DNA centromeric probe and the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis technique (comet assay) in Human T-Lymphocytes. Environ Mol Mutagenesis 1999; 34: 269-278
• 50 Hoffmann H, Speit G. Assessment of DNA damage in peripheral blood of heavy smokers with the comet assay and the micronucleus test. Mutat Res 2005; 581: 105-114
• 51 Vasquez MZ. Combining the in vivo comet and micronucleus assays: a practical approach to genotoxicity testing and data interpretation. Mutagenesis 2010; 25: 187-199
• 52 Minozzo R, Deimling LI, Santos-Mello R. Cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus cytome and comet assays in peripheral blood lymphocytes of workers exposed to lead considering folate and vitamin B12 status. Mutat Res/Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2010; 697: 24-32
• 53 Olden K, Guthrie J. Genomics: implications for toxicology. Mutat Res 2001; 473: 3-10
• 54 Toscano WA, Oehlke KP. Systems biology: new approaches to old environmental health problems. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2005; 2: 4-9
• 55 Sexton K, Needham L, Pirkle J. Human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals. Am Sci 2004; 92: 38
• 56 Angerer J, Ewers U, Wilhelm M. Human biomonitoring: state of the art. Int J Hygiene Environ Health 2007; 210: 201-228
• 57 Au WW, Cajas-Salazar N, Salama S. Factors contributing to discrepancies in population monitoring studies. Mutat Res, Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen 1998; 400: 467-478
• 58 Ataseven N, YÜzbaŞıoĞlu D, Keskin AÇ. et al. Genotoxicity of monosodium glutamate. Food Chem Toxicol 2016; 91: 8-18
• 59 Geras'kin SA, Kimb JK, Oudalova AA. Bio-monitoring the genotoxicity of populations of Scots pine in the vicinity of a radioactive waste storage facility. Mutat Res 2005; 583: 55-66
• 60 Choi J, Morck TA, Joas A. et al. Major national human biomonitoring programs in chemical exposure assessment. Environ Sci 2015; 2: 782-802
• 61 Dagnino A, Bo T, Copetta A. et al. Development and application of an innovative expert decision support system to manage sediments and to assess environmental risk in freshwater ecosystems. Environ Int 2013; 60: 171-182
• 62 Maffei F, Hrelia P, Angelini S. et al. Effects of environmental benzene: Micronucleus frequencies and haematological values in traffic police working in an urban area. Mutat Res 2005; 583: 1-11
• 63 Kim K-H, Jahan SA, Kabir E. A review of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their human health effects. Environ Inter 2013; 60: 71-80
• 64 Song XF, Chen ZY, Zang ZJ. Investigation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon level in blood and semen quality for residents in Pearl River Delta Region in China. Environ Int 2013; 60: 97-105
• 65 GrawÉ J, Biko J, Lorenz R. et al. Evaluation of the reticulocyte micronucleus assay in patients treated with radioiodine for thyroid cancer. Mutat Res 2005; 583: 12-25
• 66 Harvey JS, Lyons BP, Page TS. et al. An assessment of the genotoxic impact of the Sea Empress oil spill by the measurement of DNA adduct levels in selected invertebrate and vertebrate species. Mutat Res 1999; 441: 103-114
• 67 Ceretti E, Feretti D, Viola GC. et al. DNA damage in buccal mucosa cells of pre-school children exposed to high levels of urban air pollutants. PLoS One 2014; 2: 1-9
• 68 Demircigil GÇ, Erdem O, Gaga EO. et al. Cytogenetic biomonitoring of primary school children exposed to air pollutants: micronuclei analysis of buccal epithelial cells. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2014; 21: 1197-1207
• 69 Marcon A, Fracasso ME, Marchetti P. et al. Outdoor formaldehyde and NO₂ exposures and markers of genotoxicity in children living near chipboard industries. Environ Health Perspect 2014; 122: 639-645
• 70 Coelho P, GarcÍa-LestÓn J, Costa S. et al. Genotoxic effect of exposure to metal(loid)s. A molecular epidemiology survey of populations living and working in Panasqueira mine area, Portugal. Environ Int 2013; 60: 163-170
• 71 Mesic A, Nefic H. Assessment of the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in environmentally exposed human populations to heavy metals using the cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay. Environ Toxicol 2015; 30: 1331-1342
• 72 Kligerman AD, Erexson GL. An evaluation of the feasibility of using cytogenetic damage as a biomarker for alachlor exposure. Mutat Res 1999; 441: 95-101
• 73 Banerjee S, Singh NN, Sreedhar G. et al. Analysis of the genotoxic effects of mobile phone radiation using buccal micronucleus assay: A comparative evaluation. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10: 82-85
• 74 Pastor S, Creus A, ParrÓn T. et al. Biomonitoring of four European populations occupationally exposed to pesticides: use of micronuclei as biomarkers. Mutagenesis 2003; 18: 249-258
• 75 Bernardi N, Gentile N, MaÑas F. et al. Assessment of the level of damage to the genetic material of children exposed to pesticides in the province of CÓrdoba. Arch Argent Pediatr 2015; 113: 126-131
• 76 De Coster S, Koppen G, Bracke M. et al. Pollutant effects on genotoxic parameters and tumor-associated protein levels in adults: A cross sectional study. Environ Health 2008; 7: 26
• 77 RodrÍguez TG, Aldeco RG, Alvarez HB. et al. Genotoxicity in child populations exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the air from Tabasco, Mexico. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2008; 5: 349-355
• 78 MielzyŃska D, SiwiŃska E, Kapka L. et al. The influence of environmental exposure to complex mixtures including PAHs and lead on genotoxic effects in children living in Upper Silesia, Poland. Mutagenesis 2006; 21: 295-304
• 79 Nagya K, RÁcz G, Matsumotoa T. et al. Evaluation of the genotoxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide Phenothrin. Mutat Res, Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2014; 770: 1-5
• 80 Moro AM, Brucker N, CharÃo M. et al. Evaluation of genotoxicity and oxidative damage in painters exposed to low levels of toluene. Mutat Res, Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2012; 746: 42-48
• 81 Moro AM, CharÃoa MF, Brucker N. et al. Genotoxicity and oxidative stress in gasoline station attendants. Mutat Res, Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2013; 754: 63-70
• 82 Marco P, Priestly B, Buckett K. Carcinogen risk assessment. Can we harmonise?. Toxicol Lett 1998; 102-103: 241-246
• 83 International Labour Organization (ILO). Chemical Exposure Limits. ILO 2011. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/safework/info/publications/WCMS_151534/lang--en/index.htm
• 84 Ladeira C, Viegas S, PÁdua M. et al. Assessment of genotoxic effects in nurses handling cytostatic drugs. J Toxicol Environ Health 2014; 77: 879-887
• 85 Martino-Roth MG, ViÉgas J, Amaral M. et al. Evaluation of genotoxicity through micronuclei test in workers of car and battery repair garages. Genet Mol Biol 2002; 25: 495-500
• 86 Ladeira C, Viegas S, Carolino E. et al. Genotoxicity biomarkers in occupational exposure to formaldehyde—The case of histopathology laboratories. Mutatn Res, Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2011; 721: 115-120
• 87 Grover P, Rekhadevi PV, Danadevi K. et al. Genotoxicity evaluation in workers occupationally exposed to lead. Int J Hygiene Environ Health 2010; 213: 99-106
• 88 Danadevi K, Rozati R, Banu BS. et al. Genotoxic evaluation of welders occupationally exposed to chromium and nickel using the comet and micronucleus assays. Mutagenesis 2004; 19: 35-41
• 89 Calvert GM, Talaska G, Mueller CA. et al. Genotoxicity in workers exposed to methyl bromide. Mutat Res, Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 1998; 417: 115-128
• 90 Heuser VD, Andrade MV, Silva J. et al. Comparison of genetic damage in Brazilian footwear-workers exposed to solvent-based or water-based adhesive. Mutat Res 2005; 583: 85-94
• 91 Silveira HC, Schmidt-Carrijo M, Seidel EH. et al. Emissions generated by sugarcane burning promote genotoxicity in rural workers: A case study in Barretos, Brazil. Environ Health 2013; 12: 87
• 92 Pitarque M, Vaglenov A, Nosko M. et al. Evaluation of DNA damage by the comet assay in shoe workers exposed to toluene and other organic solvents. Mutat Res 1999; 44: 115-127
• 93 Strickland PT, Groopman JD. Biomarkers for assessing environmental exposure to carcinogens in the diet. Am J Clin Nutr 1995; 61: 710-720
• 94 Sutandyo N. Nutritional carcinogenesis. Acta Med Indones 2010; 42: 36-42
• 95 Anand P, Kunnumakkara AB, Kunnumakara AB. et al. Cancer is a preventable disease that requires major lifestyle changes. Pharm Res 2008; 25: 2097-2116
• 96 Willett W, Giovannucci E. et al. Epidemiology of diet and cancer risk. Shils M.E., Shike M. Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams and Wilkins; 2006: 1627
• 97 The American Cancer Society, Food additives, safety, and organic foods. The American Cancer Society medical and editorial content team, 2012. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/healthy/eat-healthy-get-active/acs-guidelines-nutrition-physical-activity-cancer-prevention/food-additives.html
• 98 Swaroop VR, Dinesh RD, Vijayakumar T. Genotoxicity of synthetic food colorants. J Food Sci Eng 2011; 1: 128-134
• 99 Duarte-Salles T, Mendez MA, Meltzer HM. et al. Dietary benzo(a)pyrene intake during pregnancy and birth weight: Associations modified by vitamin C intakes in the Norwegian mother and child cohort study (MoBa). Environ Int 2013; 60: 217-223
• 100 Papadopoulou E, Caspersen IH, Kvalem HE. Maternal dietary intake of dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls and birth size in the Norwegian mother and child cohort study (MoBa). Environ Int 2013; 60: 209-216
• 101 Banerjee M, Banerjee N, Bhattacharjee P. et al. High arsenic in rice is associated with elevated genotoxic effects in humans. Sci Rep 2013; 3: 1-8
• 102 KlariĆ MS, Darabos D, Rozgaj R. et al. Beauvericin and ochratoxin A genotoxicity evaluated using the alkaline comet assay: Single and combined genotoxic action. Arch Toxicol 2010; 84: 641-650
• 103 Yılmaz S, Ünal F, YÜzbaŞıoĞlu D. The in vitro genotoxicity of benzoic acid in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Cytotechnology 2009; 60: 55-61
• 104 Mamur S, , YÜzbaŞıo⧃lu D, Unal F. et al. Genotoxicity of food preservative sodium sorbate in human lymphocytes in vitro. Cytotechnology 2012; 64: 553-562
• 105 Kus E, Eroglu HE. Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of sunset yellow and brilliant blue, colorant food additives, on human blood lymphocytes. Pak J Pharm Sci 2015; 28: 227-230
• 106 Spitz MR, Bondy ML. The evolving discipline of molecular epidemiology of cancer. Carcinogenesis 2010; 31: 127-134