Background: SoundTracker is an algorithm in Widex's Compass fitting software that could potentially
be used to estimate a patient's aided sensation level (SL). SoundTracker's accuracy
of estimating a patient's SL has never been verified in comparison to SL measured
with commercially available real-ear analyzers.
Purpose: Determine whether statistically significant differences are present between the estimated
SL of the Widex SoundTracker software application and the measured SL of the Audioscan
Verifit and Frye 6500 real-ear analyzers at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz.
Research Design: This study used a randomized repeated measures design to determine differences in
SL between SoundTracker and the Verifit and 6500.
Study Sample: Ten subjects (N = 20 ears) were recruited who were experienced users of behind-the-ear
hearing aids with conventional vented earmolds and had bilateral sensorineural hearing
loss that was >30 dB HL below 1000 Hz and ≤70 dB HL to 4000 Hz.
Data Collection and Analysis: Real-ear in-situ thresholds (dB sound pressure level [SPL]) and real-ear aided responses
(REAR; dB SPL) were measured at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz to determine differences
in SL between SoundTracker, Verifit, and 6500. A three-factor repeated measures analysis
of variance (ANOVA) was utilized to determine differences between method (real-ear
analyzers and SoundTracker), analyzer (Verifit and 6500), and frequency (500, 1000,
2000, and 4000 Hz).
Results: Mean differences in measured SL for the Verifit and 6500 were ≤2 dB when compared
to the estimated SL using SoundTracker. A statistically significant difference in
SL was present between the Verifit and SoundTracker at 2000 Hz (p < 0.01), but no significant differences were present at 500, 1000, and 4000 Hz. A
statistically significant difference in SL was present between the 6500 and SoundTracker
at 4000 Hz (p < 0.01), but no significant differences were present at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz. Mean
differences in measured SL between the real-ear analyzers (difference of SoundTracker
SL minus Verifit SL compared to the difference of SoundTracker SL minus 6500 SL) were
≤2 dB with a statistically significant difference present at 2000 Hz (p < 0.01), but no statistically significant differences were present at 500, 1000,
or 4000 Hz.
Conclusions: Nearly 85% of the differences between the estimated SoundTracker SL and the measured
SLs of the Verifit and 6500 were ≤2 dB. Despite some limitations of this study, SoundTracker
could be useful as a counseling tool to illustrate to patients which sounds are audible
or inaudible when unaided and aided.
Key Words
Hearing aid - in-situ threshold - live speech mapping - real-ear measures - sensation
level - SoundTracker
