<title/>
Purpose: The sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of commonly used behavioral central
auditory processing tests and test batteries were determined for 20 individuals with
known lesions of the central auditory nervous system (CANS) and related auditory symptoms.
Research Design: Twenty-nine individuals with no known neurological involvement served as the control
group. Both groups were administered dichotic digits (DD), competing sentences (CS),
frequency patterns (FP), and low-pass filtered speech (FS) tests.
Data Analysis: Diagnostic indices for individual tests and test batteries comprised of two, three,
or four tests were calculated both using a lax criterion in which failure on only
one test in a battery led to a positive diagnosis and using a strict criterion in
which failure on all tests in the battery was necessary to trigger a positive diagnosis.
Results: The test battery providing the best balance between sensitivity and specificity varied
as a function of criterion. The two-test DD-FP battery using a strict criterion demonstrated
the best balance.
Conclusions: Limitations of particular tests, the advantages of larger test batteries to more
broadly examine multiple auditory processes, the degree to which the present results
can be generalized clinically to populations without known brain lesions, and other
clinical considerations are discussed.
Key Words
Auditory processing disorder - diagnostic techniques
