J Am Acad Audiol 2020; 31(02): 087-095
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.18036
Articles
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Predictors of Hearing Aid Use in the Advanced Digital Era: An Investigation of Benefit, Satisfaction, and Self-Efficacy

Anna Marie Jilla
*   Hearing Evaluation, Rehabilitation, and Outcomes Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, College of Allied Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
,
Carole E. Johnson
*   Hearing Evaluation, Rehabilitation, and Outcomes Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, College of Allied Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
,
Jeffrey L. Danhauer
†   Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
,
Michael Anderson
‡   Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
,
Jenna N. Smith
*   Hearing Evaluation, Rehabilitation, and Outcomes Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, College of Allied Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
,
James C. Sullivan
*   Hearing Evaluation, Rehabilitation, and Outcomes Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, College of Allied Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
,
Kristin R. Sanchez
*   Hearing Evaluation, Rehabilitation, and Outcomes Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, College of Allied Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

23 May 2018

Publication Date:
25 May 2020 (online)

Abstract

Background:

Untreated sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has been linked to depression, social isolation, anxiety, and a reduction in health-related quality of life (QoL), and is independently associated with cognitive decline. Only one in five persons with SNHL pursues amplification; 76–97% of those having hearing aids report regular or occasional use. Although hearing aid use during all waking hours is advocated for children, recommendations for adults are not as clear. Treatment outcomes, including benefit, satisfaction, and self-efficacy with hearing aids, may be predictors of self-reported hearing aid use, which is useful in clinical practice.

Purpose:

The aim of this study was to determine average hours of self-reported daily hearing aid use by adults and if treatment outcome measures of benefit, satisfaction, and self-efficacy with hearing aids can predict self-reported daily hearing aid use in adults.

Research Design:

The present study was a prospective cross-sectional survey with retrospective chart review.

Study Sample:

The study sample consisted of 152 experienced adult advanced digital technology (ADT) hearing aid users between 18 and 90 years of age who were patients in a two-office private practice in California.

Data Collection and Analysis:

A postal survey was sent to 500 experienced adult ADT hearing aid users. Participants completed the Visual Analog Scale for Daily Use of Hearing Aids (VASuse) and validated measures of (1) self-efficacy, (2) satisfaction, and (3) benefit. Retrospective data were collected for all respondents via chart review. Multivariable linear regression was used to explore relationships between treatment outcomes and hearing aid use.

Results:

Experienced hearing aid users wore their hearing aids an average of 12.0 h/day. Daily hearing aid use was significantly associated with residual participation restriction (RPR) on the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) item 5 (p = 0.02). The VASuse was significantly associated with the IOI-HA factor 1, “Me and My Hearing Aids” (p = 0.03), an aggregate measure of satisfaction, benefit, and QoL.

Conclusions:

Participants reported wearing their hearing aids an average of 12.0 h/day. Self-reported daily hearing aid use was associated with a combination of satisfaction, benefit, and increased QoL, and with RPR. The interconnectedness of satisfaction, benefit, and QoL positively affected hearing aid use, and greater levels of RPR seemed to discourage hearing aid use. If hearing aid owners are inconsistent or nonusers, then counseling and outcome measures should be used in the domains of satisfaction, benefit, and QoL. Future research should involve additional ADT hearing aid users with different experience levels across various study sites.

This study is funded by the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, College of Allied Health Student Research and Creativity Grant: Tier II.


Portions of this research were presented at the 2015 American Auditory Society Scientific and Technical Conference, March 2–4; the XXXIII World Congress of Audiology, September 21–23, 2016, Vancouver BC, Canada; and the American Academy of Audiology Annual Conference, AudiologyNow!, April 14–16, 2016.


 
  • REFERENCES

  • Aazh H, Prasher D, Nanchahal K, Moore BCJ. 2015; Hearing-aid use and its determinants in the UK National Health Service: a cross-sectional study at the Royal Surrey Country Hospital. Int J Audiol 54: 152-161
  • Abrams HB, Kihm J. 2015; An introduction to MarkeTrak IX: a new baseline for the hearing aid market. Hear Rev 22: 16
  • Acoustical Society of America 2014. ANSI S3.22-2014: Specification of Hearing Aid Characteristics. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute;
  • Bainbridge KE, Ramachandran V. 2014; Hearing aid use among older U.S. adults: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2006 and 2009–2010. Ear Hear 35: 289-294
  • Bertoli S, Staehelin K, Zemp E, Schindler C, Bodmer D, Probst R. 2009; Survey on hearing aid use and satisfaction in Switzerland and their determinants. Int J Audiol 48: 183-195
  • Chisolm TH, Johnson CE, Danhauer JL, Portz LJP, Abrams HB, Lesner S, McCarthy PA, Newman CW. 2007; A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force on the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults. J Am Acad Audiol 18: 151-183
  • Chen C. 2002. Robust regression and outlier detection with the ROBUSTREG procedure. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual SAS Users Group International Conference Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc;
  • Cohen J. 1992; A power primer. Psych Bull 112: 155-159
  • Cox RM, Alexander GC. 2001; Validation of the SADL questionnaire. Ear Hear 22: 151-160
  • Cox RM, Alexander GC. 2002; The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol 41: 30-35
  • Cox RM, Alexander GC, Gray GA. 2007; Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes. Ear Hear 28: 141-162
  • Davis A, Smith P, Ferguson M, Stephens D, Gianopoulos I. 2007; Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models. Health Technol Assess 11: 1-294
  • Dillon H. 2012. Hearing Aids. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Thieme;
  • Dullard B. 2014 A comparison of general and task-specific measures of self-efficacy in adult hearing aid users. DigitalCommons@UConn. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6753&context=dissertations . Accessed June 12, 2017.
  • Gaffney P. 2008 Reported hearing aid use versus datalogging in a VA population. Hearing Review. http://www.hearingreview.com/2008/06/reported-hearing-aid-use-versus-datalogging-in-a-va-population/ . Accessed March 24, 2016.
  • Hartley D, Rochtchina E, Newall P, Golding M, Mitchell P. 2010; Use of hearing aid and assistive listening devices in an older Australian population. J Am Acad Audiol 21: 642-653
  • Hickson L, Meyer C, Lovelock K, Lampert M, Khan A. 2014; Factors associated with success with hearing aids in older adults. Int J Audiol 53: S18-S27
  • Holland P, Welsch R. 1977; Robust regression using interactively reweighted least squares. Commun Stat Theor Methods 6: 813-827
  • Hosford-Dunn H, Halpern J. 2001; Clinical Application of the SADL Scale in private practice II: predictive validity of fitting variables. J Am Acad Audiol 12: 15-36
  • Jilla AM. 2016. Visual Analog Scale for Daily Use of Hearing Aids: VASuse. Oklahoma City, OK: University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center;
  • Kaplan-Neeman R, Muchnik C, Hildesheimer M, Henkin Y. 2012; Hearing aid satisfaction and use in the advanced digital era. Laryngoscope 122: 2039-2036
  • Karawani H, Jenkins K, Anderson S. 2018; Restoration of sensory input may improve cognitive and neural function. Neuropsychologia 114: 203-213
  • Keidser G, Dillon H, Flax M, Ching T, Brewer S. 2011; The NAL-NL2 prescription procedure. Audiol Res 1: 88-90
  • Laplante-Lévesque A, Nielsen C, Jensen LD, Naylor G. 2014; Patterns of hearing aid usage predict hearing aid use amount (data logged and self-reported) and overreport. J Am Acad Audiol 25: 187-198
  • Lin FR, Albert M. 2014; Hearing loss and dementia – who is listening?. Aging Ment Health 18: 671-673
  • Lin FR, Yaffe K, Xia J, Xue QL, Harris TB, Purchase-Helzner E, Satterfield S, Ayonayon HN, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM. Health ABC Study Group 2013; Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Intern Med 173: 293-299
  • Maharani A, Dawes P, Nazroo J, Tampubolon G, Pendleton N. 2018; Longitudinal relationship between hearing aid use and cognitive function in older Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc 66: 1130-1136
  • Meyer C, Hickson L, Fletcher A. 2014; Identifying the barriers and facilitators to optimal hearing aid self-efficacy. Int J Audiol 53: S28-S37
  • National Council on the Aging 1999. The Consequences of Untreated Hearing Loss in Older Persons. Washington, DC: National Council on the Aging;
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) 2016 Quick Statistics about Hearing. https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/quick-statistics-hearing . Accessed February 22, 2018
  • Perez E, Edmonds BA. 2012; A systematic review of studies measuring and reporting hearing-aid usage in older adults since 1999: a descriptive summary of measurement tools. PLoS One 7: e31831
  • SAS Institute Inc 2013. SAS/ACCESS® 9.4 Interface to ADABAS Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc;
  • Uriarte M, Denzin L, Dunstan A, Sellars J, Hickson L. 2005; Measuring hearing aid outcomes using the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) Questionnaire: Australian data. J Am Acad Audiol 16: 383-402
  • Valente M, Abrams H, Benson D, Chisolm T, Citron D, Hampton D, Loavenbruck A, Ticketts T, Solodar H, Sweetow R. 2006; Guidelines for the audiologic management of adult hearing impairment. Audiol Today 18: 1-44
  • Weinstein BE, Ventry IM. 1982; Hearing impairment and social isolation in the elderly. J Speech Hear Res 25: 593-599
  • West RL, Smith SL. 2007; Development of a hearing aid self-efficacy questionnaire. Int J Audiol 46: 759-771
  • Wong LLN, Hickson L, McPherson B. 2003; Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say?. Trends Amplif 7: 117-161