Effects of Secondhand Smoke Exposure on Hearing and Auditory Evoked Potentials, ABR and AMLR in Young Adults

Abstract

Background:

Population health is impacted by environmental secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. Although the negative health effects of SHS exposure include respiratory problems in children (nonsmokers) as seen in cigarette smokers, other health impacts such as sensory function are not assumed to be the same for both passive nonsmokers and smokers. However, hearing loss was recently reported in adolescents and aging adults with SHS exposure, suggesting that SHS might impact auditory function similarly to cigarette smoking. Specific effects of SHS exposure on the central auditory system have not been fully described.

Purpose:

To measure auditory function via pure-tone audiometry and evoked potentials in young nonsmoking adults aged 18–23 yr who reported exposure to environmental SHS.

Research Design:

Participants were selected for the SHS-exposed (SHS-E) group first, followed by age and gender matched individuals for the SHS-unexposed (SHS-U) group. Self-reported nonsmoker status was confirmed by biochemical analysis of urine for cotinine level.

Study Sample:

Potential participants (N = 208) completed a questionnaire about health, smoking history, SHS exposure, and hearing ability. Individuals with any neurological conditions, alcohol/drug dependencies, excessive noise exposure, using certain medications, or current smokers were excluded. Twenty-two nonsmokers in excellent health consented to participate. Participants in the SHS-E group reported SHS exposure in home, work, or social settings for an extensive time period. Participants in the SHS-U group did not live with smokers and reported no SHS exposure, medication use, tinnitus, or any chemical exposures. Statistical analysis was conducted on data from 20 participants, 10 per group with a mean age of 20 yr.

Data Collection and Analysis:

Participants underwent auditory procedures in one session in an IAC sound-treated room, including otoscopy, tympanometry, pure-tone threshold evaluation, auditory brainstem response per ear, and a three-channel auditory middle latency response in the right ear. The primary study outcomes were hearing thresholds measured (dB HL) at five frequencies, and evoked potential wave latencies (I, III, V, Na, Pa, Nb, Pb) and amplitudes (V–I, Na–Pa, Pa–Nb, Nb–Pb). It was hypothesized that SHS-exposed individuals would have poorer hearing sensitivity (threshold >25 dB HL) and abnormal central auditory function (longer latencies; smaller amplitudes) based on evoked potentials. Statistical analyses focused on identification of group differences in hearing and central auditory function.

Results:

All participants had normal hearing sensitivity (thresholds ≤25 dB HL) with no significant group differences. The V/I amplitude ratio in the right ear was significantly decreased in SHS-exposed individuals (p < 0.05). Auditory brainstem response latencies were not significantly different between participant groups or ears. Wave Pb latency was significantly increased in SHS-exposed individuals (p < 0.01). Auditory middle latency response relative amplitudes were significantly different from each other at every electrode site (Cz, Fz, C4) but not between groups. Overall, the Na–Pa complex was highest in amplitude at all three electrode sites.

Conclusions:

This preliminary study indicated toxic effects of SHS exposure by evoked potentials with decreased V/I amplitude ratio and longer (delayed) Pb latency in young adults. Further studies should corroborate these findings to facilitate clinical recommendations.

Key Words

ABR - AMLR - evoked potentials - secondhand smoke

The results of this study were presented at the 2014 HEAL Conference in Lake Como, Italy and at the 2015 ENT/SAAA/SASLHA Congress in Durban, South Africa.

• REFERENCES

• Avila-Tang E, Elf JL, Cummings KM, Fong GT, Hovell MF, Klein JD, McMillen R, Winickoff JP, Samet JM. 2013; Assessing secondhand smoke exposure with reported measures. Tob Control 22 (03) 156-163
• Bear MF, Connors BW, Paradiso MA. 2001. Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;
• Cruickshanks KJ, Klein R, Klein BE, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM, Tweed TS. 1998; Cigarette smoking and hearing loss: the epidemiology of hearing loss study. JAMA 279 (21) 1715-1719
• Etter JF, Vu Duc T, Perneger TV. 2000; Saliva cotinine levels in smokers and nonsmokers. Am J Epidemiol 151 (03) 251-258
• Fabry DA, Davila EP, Arheart KL, Serdar B, Dietz NA, Bandiera FC, Lee DJ. 2011; Secondhand smoke exposure and the risk of hearing loss. Tob Control 20 (01) 82-85
• Golub MS, Slotkin TA, Tarantal AF, Pinkerton KE. 2007; Visual recognition memory and auditory brainstem response in infant rhesus monkeys exposed perinatally to environmental tobacco smoke. Brain Res 1151: 102-106
• Gopal KV, Herrington R, Pearce J. 2009; Analysis of auditory measures in normal hearing young male adult cigarette smokers using multiple variable selection methods with predictive validation assessments. Int J Otol 1-7
• Hall JW. 2007. New Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon;
• Harkrider AW, Champlin CA, McFadden D. 2001; Acute effect of nicotine on non-smokers: I. OAEs and ABRs. Hear Res 160 1–2 73-88
• Hashimoto I. 1982; Auditory evoked potentials from the human midbrain: slow brain stem responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 53 (06) 652-657
• Jasper HH. 1958; The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 10: 371-375
• Jones LL, Hassanien A, Cook DG, Britton J, Leonardi-Bee J. 2012; Parental smoking and the risk of middle ear disease in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 166 (01) 18-27
• Kraus N, McGee T, Stein L. 1994. The auditory middle latency response: clinical uses, development, and generating system. In: Jacobson JT. Principles and applications in auditory evoked potentials. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon;
• Le Houezec J, Benowitz NL. 1991; Basic and clinical psychopharmacology of nicotine. Clin Chest Med 12 (04) 681-699
• Lalwani AK, Liu YH, Weitzman M. 2011; Secondhand smoke and sensorineural hearing loss in adolescents. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137 (07) 655-662
• Lyons RA. 1992; Passive smoking and hearing loss in infants. Ir Med J 85 (03) 111-112
• Metzger KL, Maxwell CR, Liang Y, Siegel SJ. 2007; Effects of nicotine vary across two auditory evoked potentials in the mouse. Biol Psychiatry 61 (01) 23-30
• Moller AR. 1994. Neural generators of auditory evoked potentials. In: Jacobson JT. Principles and applications of auditory evoked potentials. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon;
• Panzano VC, Wayne GF, Pickworth WB, Connolly GN. 2010; Human electroencephalography and the tobacco industry: a review of internal documents. Tob Control 19 (02) 153-159
• Ramkissoon I, Beverly BL. 2014; The effects of age and stimulus type on auditory evoked potentials in cigarette smokers and nonsmokers. J Speech Lang Hear Res 57 (01) 271-284
• Ramkissoon I, Chambers RD. 2008; Effects of chronic and acute smoking on AMLRs in older and younger listeners. Int J Audiol 47 (12) 715-723
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) 2006. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health;
• World Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer 2004; Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 83: 1-1438