Description, Normative Data, and Utility of the Hearing Aid Skills and Knowledge Test

Abstract

Background:

The ability to manage hearing aids is crucial for successful outcomes and for maintaining hearing aid use. It is therefore important to have a tool that can effectively identify which hearing aid management skills are lacking so that the audiologist can provide additional education and training on that skill. Such a tool can also provide useful quantitative data for researchers.

Purpose:

To collect normative data (Experiment 1) and assess inter- and intrarater reliability (Experiment 2) for a hearing aid management assessment tool known as the Hearing Aid Skills and Knowledge (HASK) test.

Study Sample:

Two hundred thirty-six new hearing aid users recruited from the VA Portland Health Care System and 126 experienced hearing aid users recruited from the local Portland community participated in Experiment 1. The veteran participants were taking part in a larger hearing aid study, and the community participants were recruited at community events that took place around Portland, OR. Three clinical audiologists and two AuD students completing their fourth year externship participated in Experiment 2.

Data Collection and Analysis:

In Experiment 1, HASK data were collected from the new hearing aid users at 4–8 wk and 6–8 mo after the fitting of their first pair of hearing aids, and from experienced users on a single occasion. In addition, self-reported hearing aid use, benefit, and satisfaction were assessed for all participants. The audiologists/students in Experiment 2 watched and independently scored videos of six individuals completing the HASK. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) across audiologists were computed for HASK scores. Three audiologists/students rated at least one video on two occasions to provide interrater reliability data.

Results:

Mean performance on the HASK was about 70% for knowledge and 80% for skills for both the new and experienced hearing aid users. Performance did not change among the new users between the 4–8 wk and 6–8 mo administration. The specific skills lacking were associated with advanced management abilities (cleaning and troubleshooting). Experiment 2 revealed ICCs for inter- and intrarater reliability for HASK to range from 0.76 to 0.94, showing acceptable to excellent reliability.

Conclusions:

The HASK is a quick and easy test with good-to-excellent inter- and intrarater reliability. It can effectively identify which hearing aid management skills are lacking so that the audiologist can provide additional education and training on those skills. Data show performance is ∼70% for knowledge and 80% for skills and this does not change with hearing aid experience. The significant positive correlations between HASK scores and hearing aid use and satisfaction highlight the notion that ability to manage hearing aids successfully is integral to good hearing aid outcome.

Key Words

hearing aids - hearing aid management - hearing loss - rehabilitation

This study was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Veterans Health Administration, VA Office of Research and Development awards no. C1260R and C9230C.

Aspects of this work have been presented at the American Auditory Society meeting, Scottsdale, AZ, March 3–5, 2015, and the International Hearing Aid Conference (IHCON), Lake Tahoe, CA, August 13–17, 2014, and August 10–13, 2016.

The views are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position or policy of the US Department of Veterans Affairs or the US Government.

• REFERENCES

• Better Hearing Institute 2005 Your guide to hearing aids. http://www.betterhearing.org/sites/default/files/hearingpedia-resources/Your_Guide_to_Hearing_Aids.pdf . Accessed March 8, 2017
• Bertoli S, Staehelin K, Zemp E, Schindler C, Bodmer D, Probst R. 2009; Survey on hearing aid use and satisfaction in Switzerland and their determinants. Int J Audiol 48 (04) 183-195
• Campos PD, Bozza A, Ferrari DV. 2014; Hearing aid handling skills: relationship with satisfaction and benefit. CoDAS 26 (01) 10-16
• Caposecco A, Hickson L, Meyer C, Khan A. 2016; Evaluation of a Modified User Guide for Hearing Aid Management. Ear Hear 37 (01) 27-37
• Cox RM, Alexander GC. 2002; The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol 41 (01) 30-35
• Desjardins JL, Doherty KA. 2009; Do experienced hearing aid users know how to use their hearing AIDS correctly?. Am J Audiol 18 (01) 69-76
• Doherty KA, Desjardins JL. 2012; The Practical Hearing Aids Skills Test-Revised. Am J Audiol 21 (01) 100-105
• Hickson L, Meyer C, Lovelock K, Lampert M, Khan A. 2014; Factors associated with success with hearing aids in older adults. Int J Audiol 53 (1, Suppl) S18-S27
• Jansen J, van Weert J, van der Meulen N, van Dulmen S, Heeren T, Bensing J. 2008; Recall in older cancer patients: measuring memory for medical information. Gerontologist 48 (02) 149-157
• Kumar M, Hickey S, Shaw S. 2000; Manual dexterity and successful hearing aid use. J Laryngol Otol 114 (08) 593-597
• Lupsakko TA, Kautiainen HJ, Sulkava R. 2005; The non-use of hearing aids in people aged 75 years and over in the city of Kuopio in Finland. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 262 (03) 165-169
• McCormack A, Fortnum H. 2013; Why do people fitted with hearing aids not wear them?. Int J Audiol 52 (05) 360-368
• Meister H, Lausberg I, Kiessling J, von Wedel H, Walger M. 2002; Identifying the needs of elderly, hearing-impaired persons: the importance and utility of hearing aid attributes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 259 (10) 531-534
• Meister H, Lausberg I, Walger M, von Wedel H. 2001; Using conjoint analysis to examine the importance of hearing aid attributes. Ear Hear 22 (02) 142-150
• Pothier DD, Bredenkamp C. 2006; Hearing aid insertion: correlation between patients’ confidence and ability. J Laryngol Otol 120 (05) 378-380
• Reese JL, Hnath-Chisolm T. 2005; Recognition of hearing aid orientation content by first-time users. Am J Audiol 14 (01) 94-104
• Reese J, Smith S. 2006; Recall of hearing aid orientation content by first-time hearing aid users. Semin Hear 27: 337-344
• Salonen J, Johansson R, Karjalainen S, Vahlberg T, Jero JP, Isoaho R. 2013; Hearing aid compliance in the elderly. B-ENT 9 (01) 23-28
• Singh G, Pichora-Fuller MK, Hayes D, von Schroeder HP, Carnahan H. 2013; The aging hand and the ergonomics of hearing aid controls. Ear Hear 34 (01) e1-e13