Download PDF
J Am Acad Audiol 2018; 29(06): 477-494
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16111
Articles
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Mild-Gain Hearing Aids as a Treatment for Adults with Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties

Christina M. Roup
*   The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
,
Emily Post
*   The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
,
Jessica Lewis
*   The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 May 2020 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background:

There is a growing body of evidence demonstrating self-reported hearing difficulties (HD; i.e., substantial difficulty in understanding speech in complex listening situations) in adults with normal pure-tone sensitivity. Anecdotally, some audiologists have tried personal mild-gain amplification as a treatment option for adults with HD. In 2008, Kuk and colleagues reported positive results of a mild-gain hearing aid trial for children with auditory processing disorders. To date, however, there have been no studies investigating the benefit of mild-gain amplification to treat HD in adults with normal audiograms.

Purpose:

The effectiveness of a four-week trial with mild-gain amplification for adults with self-reported HD and clinically normal hearing sensitivity was investigated.

Research Design:

Two participant groups with normal pure-tone audiograms (thresholds ≤20 dB HL 250–8000 Hz) were recruited to study the effects of self-reported HD on hearing handicap, self-perceived auditory processing difficulties, and performance on a speech-in-noise task. Furthermore, the benefit of mild-gain amplification was examined after a four-week hearing aid trial on self-perceived hearing handicap and auditory processing difficulties, and performance on an aided speech-in-noise task. Effects were analyzed using a mixed-model repeated measures analysis of variance. Posthoc analyses were performed for each significant main effect.

Study Sample:

Thirty-nine participants participated in two groups. Twenty normal hearing adults (19–27 yr) without complaints of HD were recruited as a control group. Nineteen normal hearing adults (18–58 yr) with self-reported HD were recruited for the mild-gain hearing aid trial.

Data Collection and Analysis:

Subjective complaints of HD were assessed with two questionnaires (the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults [HHIA] and the Auditory Processing Questionnaire [APQ]) and an auditory processing test battery (SCAN:3-A, dichotic digit recognition, gaps-in-noise test, and the 500-Hz masking level difference). Speech-in-noise abilities were assessed before and after hearing aid trial using the Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) at multiple signal-to-noise ratios. Hearing aid use and impressions during the hearing aid trial were recorded.

Results:

Results demonstrated that participants with HD perceived significantly greater hearing handicap (HHIA) and greater self-perceived auditory processing difficulties (APQ) than the control group. Participants with HD performed significantly poorer on the R-SPIN relative to controls, especially for low-predictability items. Results of the hearing aid trial for participants with HD revealed significant improvements in hearing handicap, self-perceived auditory processing difficulties, and speech-in-noise performance relative to prehearing aid trial measures. The hearing aids were well tolerated by the majority of participants with HD , with most of them wearing the hearing aids an average of 1–4 h per day.

Conclusions:

The results from the present study suggest that adults who present with complaints of HD even in the presence of normal hearing sensitivity represent a unique population that warrants further evaluation beyond the standard hearing test. Furthermore, results from the hearing aid trial suggest that mild-gain amplification is a viable treatment option for at least some individuals with HD.

Key Words

auditory processing - hearing aids - speech perception

This research was supported by Widex, who provided the hearing aids.


Portions of the data from this project were presented at the 2016 AudiologyNOW! meeting in Phoenix, AZ.


 

  • REFERENCES

  • American Academy of Audiology (AAA) 2010 Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Children and Adults with Auditory Processing Disorder. www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/documents . Accessed November 24, 2013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1987. Specification for instruments to measure aural acoustic impedance and admittance (aural acoustic immittance). ANSI S3.39-1987 R2012. New York, NY: ANSI;
    Google Scholar
  • American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1997. Methods of measurement of real-ear performance characteristics of hearing aids. ANSI S3.46-1997. New York, NY: ANSI;
    Google Scholar
  • American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2003. Specification of hearing aid characteristics. ANSI S3.22-2003. New York, NY: ANSI;
    Google Scholar
  • American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2004. Specification for audiometers. ANSI S3.6-2004. New York, NY: ANSI;
    Google Scholar
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) 2005 (Central) auditory processing disorders [Technical Report] http://www.asha.org/policy/TR2005-00043/ . Accessed June 1, 2016
    PubMed
  • Bamiou DE, Liasis A, Boyd S, Cohen M, Raglan E. 2000; Central auditory processing disorder as the presenting manifestation of subtle brain pathology. Audiology 39 (03) 168-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Baran JA. 2002; Managing auditory processing disorders in adolescents and adults. Semin Hear 23 (04) 327-335
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • Beattie RC. 1989; Word recognition functions for the CID W-22 test in multitalker noise for normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Speech Hear Disord 54 (01) 20-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Beattie RC, Barr T, Roup C. 1997; Normal and hearing-impaired word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and noise. Br J Audiol 31 (03) 153-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Bellis TJ, Ferre JM. 1999; Multidimensional approach to the differential diagnosis of central auditory processing disorders in children. J Am Acad Audiol 10 (06) 319-328
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Bentler RA. 2005; Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 16 (07) 473-484
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Bergemalm PO, Lyxell B. 2005; Appearances are deceptive? Long-term cognitive and central auditory sequelae from closed head injury. Int J Audiol 44 (01) 39-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Bergman M, Hirsch S, Solzi P. 1987; Interhemispheric suppression: a test of central auditory function. Ear Hear 8 (02) 87-91
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Bilger RC. 1984. Speech recognition test development. In: Elkins E. Speech Recognition by the Hearing Impaired. Vol. 14. Rockville, MD: American Speech- Language-Hearing Association;
    Google Scholar
  • Bilger RC, Nuetzel JM, Rabinowitz WM, Rzeczkowski C. 1984; Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. J Speech Hear Res 27 (01) 32-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Boothroyd A. 2004; Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone. Ear Hear 25 (01) 22-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Department of Veterans Affairs 1998. Tonal and Speech Materials for Auditory Perceptual Assessment, Disc 2.0. Mountain Home, TN: VA Medical Center;
    Google Scholar
  • Department of Veterans Affairs 2006. Speech Recognition and Identification Materials, Disc 4.0. Mountain Home, TN: VA Medical Center;
    Google Scholar
  • Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB. 2002; Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 111 (06) 2897-2907
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Dubno JR, Levitt H. 1981; Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 69 (01) 249-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Duffy JR, Giolas TG. 1974; Sentence intelligibility as a function of key word selection. J Speech Hear Res 17 (04) 631-637
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Fausti SA, Wilmington DJ, Gallun FJ, Myers PJ, Henry JA. 2009; Auditory and vestibular dysfunction associated with blast-related traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 46 (06) 797-810
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Finney DJ. 1952. Statistical Method in Biological Essay. London: C. Griffen;
    Google Scholar
  • Gallun FJ, Diedesch AC, Kubli LR, Walden TC, Folmer RL, Lewis MS, McDermott DJ, Fausti SA, Leek MR. 2012; Performance on tests of central auditory processing by individuals exposed to high-intensity blasts. J Rehabil Res Dev 49 (07) 1005-1025
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Gopinath B, Schneider J, Hickson L, McMahon CM, Burlutsky G, Leeder SR, Mitchell P. 2012; Hearing handicap, rather than measured hearing impairment, predicts poorer quality of life over 10 years in older adults. Maturitas 72 (02) 146-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Grose JH, Hall 3rd JW, Buss E. 2006; Temporal processing deficits in the pre-senescent auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 119 (04) 2305-2315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Hannula S, Bloigu R, Majamaa K, Sorri M, Mäki-Torkko E. 2011; Self-reported hearing problems among older adults: prevalence and comparison to measured hearing impairment. J Am Acad Audiol 22 (08) 550-559
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Helfer KS, Vargo M. 2009; Speech recognition and temporal processing in middle-aged women. J Am Acad Audiol 20 (04) 264-271
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Higson JM, Haggard MP, Field DL. 1994; Validation of parameters for assessing Obscure Auditory Dysfunction--robustness of determinants of OAD status across samples and test methods. Br J Audiol 28 (01) 27-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Hinchcliffe R. 1992; King-Kopetzky syndrome: an auditory stress disorder?. J Audiolog Med 1: 89-98
    Google Scholar
  • Jayaram M, Baguley DM, Moffat DA. 1992; Speech in noise: a practical test procedure. J Laryngol Otol 106 (02) 105-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Jerger J, Oliver TA, Pirozzolo F. 1990; Impact of central auditory processing disorder and cognitive deficit on the self-assessment of hearing handicap in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1 (02) 75-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Katz J. 2007 APD Evaluation to Therapy: The Buffalo Model. http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/apd-evaluation-to-therapy-buffalo-945 . Accessed June 1, 2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Keith RW. 2009. SCAN-3:A Tests for Auditory Processing Disorders in Adolescents and Adults. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation;
    Google Scholar
  • Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. 2009; Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 29 (45) 14077-14085
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Kuk F, Jackson A, Keenan D, Lau CC. 2008; Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders. J Am Acad Audiol 19 (06) 465-480
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar UA, Ameenudin S, Sangamanatha AV. 2012; Temporal and speech processing skills in normal hearing individuals exposed to occupational noise. Noise Health 14 (58) 100-105
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Lamoreau K. 2011. The Efficacy of Using Filtered Dichotic Words to Detect Subtle Auditory Processing Issues in YHoung Adults. Capstone Project. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University;
    Google Scholar
  • Leigh-Paffenroth ED, Elangovan S. 2011; Temporal processing in low-frequency channels: effects of age and hearing loss in middle-aged listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 22 (07) 393-404
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Levin HS, High Jr WM, Williams DH, Eisenberg HM, Amparo EG, Guinto Jr FC, Ewert J. 1989; Dichotic listening and manual performance in relation to magnetic resonance imaging after closed head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52 (10) 1162-1169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis MS, Valente M, Horn JE, Crandell C. 2005; The effect of hearing aids and frequency modulation technology on results from the communication profile for the hearing impaired. J Am Acad Audiol 16 (04) 250-261
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Liberman MC, Epstein MJ, Cleveland SS, Wang H, Maison SF. 2016; Toward a differential diagnosis of hidden hearing loss in humans. PLoS One 11 (09) e0162726
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Lovett B. 2011; Auditory processing disorder: school psychologist beware?. Psychol Sch 48 (08) 855-867
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lux WE. 2007; A neuropsychiatric perspective on traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 44 (07) 951-962
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Meyers JE, Roberts RJ, Bayless JD, Volkert K, Evitts PE. 2002; Dichotic listening: expanded norms and clinical application. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 17 (01) 79-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Miller GA, Nicely PA. 1955; An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 27: 338-352
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore D. 2015. The Use of Mild Gain Hearing Aids for Adults with Auditory Processing Difficulties. Capstone Project. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University;
    Google Scholar
  • Musiek FE, Baran JA, Shinn J. 2004; Assessment and remediation of an auditory processing disorder associated with head trauma. J Am Acad Audiol 15 (02) 117-132
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Musiek FE, Chermak GD, Weihing J, Zappulla M, Nagle S. 2011; Diagnostic accuracy of established central auditory processing test batteries in patients with documented brain lesions. J Am Acad Audiol 22 (06) 342-358
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Musiek FE, Shinn JB, Jirsa R, Bamiou DE, Baran JA, Zaida E. 2005; GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear 26 (06) 608-618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Newman CW, Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, Hug GA. 1990; The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults: psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. Ear Hear 11 (06) 430-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Oleksiak M, Smith BM, St Andre JR, Caughlan CM, Steiner M. 2012; Audiological issues and hearing loss among Veterans with mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 49 (07) 995-1004
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Pichora-Fuller MK. 2003; Processing speed and timing in aging adults: psychoacoustics, speech perception, and comprehension. Int J Audiol 42: S59-S67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Radloff LS. 1977; The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1: 385-401
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rappaport JM, Gulliver JM, Phillips DP, Van Dorpe RA, Maxner CE, Bhan V. 1994; Auditory temporal resolution in multiple sclerosis. J Otolaryngol 23 (05) 307-324
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Rappaport JM, Phillips DP, Gulliver JM. 1993; Disturbed speech intelligibility in noise despite a normal audiogram: a defect in temporal resolution?. J Otolaryngol 22 (06) 447-453
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Ricketts TA. 2005; Directional hearing aids: then and now. J Rehabil Res Dev 42 (04) (Suppl 2) 133-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW. 2005; Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing digital noise reduction. J Am Acad Audiol 16 (05) 270-277
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Rodriguez GP, DiSarno NJ, Hardiman CJ. 1990; Central auditory processing in normal-hearing elderly adults. Audiology 29 (02) 85-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Ross B, Fujioka T, Tremblay KL, Picton TW. 2007; Aging in binaural hearing begins in mid-life: evidence from cortical auditory-evoked responses to changes in interaural phase. J Neurosci 27 (42) 11172-11178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Roup CM, Wiley TL, Safady SH, Stoppenbach DT. 1998; Tympanometric screening norms for adults. Am J Audiol 7 (02) 55-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Saito H, Nishiwaki Y, Michikawa T, Kikuchi Y, Mizutari K, Takebayashi T, Ogawa K. 2010; Hearing handicap predicts the development of depressive symptoms after 3 years in older community-dwelling Japanese. J Am Geriatr Soc 58 (01) 93-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Saunders GH, Haggard MP. 1989; The clinical assessment of obscure auditory dysfunction--1. Auditory and psychological factors. Ear Hear 10 (03) 200-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Schaette R, McAlpine D. 2011; Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci 31 (38) 13452-13457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Shinn JB, Chermak GD, Musiek FE. 2009; GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) performance in the pediatric population. J Am Acad Audiol 20 (04) 229-238
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Smoski W, Brunt M, Tannahil J. 1998. C.H.A.P.S. Children’s Auditory Performance Scale. Tampa, FL: The Educational Audiology Association;
    Google Scholar
  • Stephens S, Rendell R. 1988; Auditory disability with normal hearing. Quaderni di Audiologia 4: 233-238
    Google Scholar
  • Stephens D, Zhao F. 2000; The role of a family history in King Kopetzky Syndrome (obscure auditory dysfunction). Acta Otolaryngol 120 (02) 197-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Strouse A, Wilson RH. 1999; Recognition of one-, two-, and three-pair dichotic digits under free and directed recall. J Am Acad Audiol 10 (10) 557-571
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Studebaker GA. 1985; A “rationalized” arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res 28 (03) 455-462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Tremblay KL, Pinto A, Fischer ME, Klein BE, Klein R, Levy S, Tweed TS, Cruickshanks KJ. 2015; Self-reported hearing difficulties among adults with normal audiograms: The Beaver Dam Offspring Study. Ear Hear 36 (06) e290-e299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Turgeon C, Champoux F, Lepore F, Leclerc S, Ellemberg D. 2011; Auditory processing after sport-related concussions. Ear Hear 32 (05) 667-670
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. 1983; Identification of elderly people with hearing problems. ASHA 25 (07) 37-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Vignesh SS, Jaya V, Muraleedharan A. 2016; Prevalence and audiological characteristics of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder in pediatric population: a retrospective study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 68 (02) 196-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Welsh LW, Welsh JJ, Healy MP. 1985; Central presbycusis. Laryngoscope 95 (02) 128-136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Wingfield A. 1996; Cognitive factors in auditory performance: context, speed of processing, and constraints of memory. J Am Acad Audiol 7 (03) 175-182
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Wiley TL, Cruickshanks KJ, Nondahl DM, Tweed TS. 2000; Self-reported hearing handicap and audiometric measures in older adults. J Am Acad Audiol 11 (02) 67-75
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Wiley TL, Cruickshanks KJ, Nondahl DM, Tweed TS, Klein R, Klein BE. 1996; Tympanometric measures in older adults. J Am Acad Audiol 7 (04) 260-268
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson RH, Burks CA, Weakley DG. 2005; Word recognition in multitalker babble measured with two psychophysical methods. J Am Acad Audiol 16 (08) 622-630
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson RH, McArdle R, Watts KL, Smith SL. 2012; The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm. J Am Acad Audiol 23 (08) 590-605
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson RH, Moncrieff DW, Townsend EA, Pillion AL. 2003; Development of a 500-Hz masking-level difference protocol for clinic use. J Am Acad Audiol 14 (01) 1-8
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao F, Stephens D. 1996; a Hearing complaints of patients with King-Kopetzky syndrome (obscure auditory dysfunction). Br J Audiol 30 (06) 397-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao F, Stephens D. 1996; b Determinants of speech-hearing disability in King-Kopetzky syndrome. Scand Audiol 25 (02) 91-96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar