Evaluation of a Stereo Music Preprocessing Scheme for Cochlear Implant Users

Abstract

Background:

Although for most cochlear implant (CI) users good speech understanding is reached (at least in quiet environments), the perception and the appraisal of music are generally unsatisfactory.

Purpose:

The improvement in music appraisal was evaluated in CI participants by using a stereo music preprocessing scheme implemented on a take-home device, in a comfortable listening environment. The preprocessing allowed adjusting the balance among vocals/bass/drums and other instruments, and was evaluated for different genres of music. The correlation between the preferred settings and the participants’ speech and pitch detection performance was investigated.

Research Design:

During the initial visit preceding the take-home test, the participants’ speech-in-noise perception and pitch detection performance were measured, and a questionnaire about their music involvement was completed. The take-home device was provided, including the stereo music preprocessing scheme and seven playlists with six songs each. The participants were asked to adjust the balance by means of a turning wheel to make the music sound most enjoyable, and to repeat this three times for all songs.

Study Sample:

Twelve postlingually deafened CI users participated in the study.

Data Collection and Analysis:

The data were collected by means of a take-home device, which preserved all the preferred settings for the different songs. Statistical analysis was done with a Friedman test (with post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test) to check the effect of “Genre.” The correlations were investigated with Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients.

Results:

All participants preferred a balance significantly different from the original balance. Differences across participants were observed which could not be explained by perceptual abilities. An effect of “Genre” was found, showing significantly smaller preferred deviation from the original balance for Golden Oldies compared to the other genres.

Conclusions:

The stereo music preprocessing scheme showed an improvement in music appraisal with complex music and hence might be a good tool for music listening, training, or rehabilitation for CI users.

Key Words

cochlear implants - music appraisal - music processing

This work was supported by the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT090274 and IWT150280) and the Cochlear Technology Centre Belgium.

Authors Wim Buyens and Bas van Dijk are employees of Cochlear Technology Centre Belgium, which is part of Cochlear Ltd.

• REFERENCES

• Buyens W, van Dijk B, Moonen M, Wouters J. 2014; Music mixing preferences of cochlear implant recipients: a pilot study. Int J Audiol 53 (05) 294-301
• Buyens W, van Dijk B, Wouters J, Moonen M. 2015; A stereo music pre-processing scheme for cochlear implant users. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 62 (10) 2434-2442
• Drennan WR, Oleson JJ, Gfeller K, Crosson J, Driscoll VD, Won JH, Anderson ES, Rubinstein JT. 2015; Clinical evaluation of music perception, appraisal and experience in cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol 54 (02) 114-123
• Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson J, Witt S, Mehr M. 2003; The effects of familiarity and complexity on appraisal of complex songs by cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. J Music Ther 40 (02) 78-112
• Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, Witt S, Murray KT, Tyler RS. 2000; Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 11 (07) 390-406
• Gfeller K, Oleson J, Knutson JF, Breheny P, Driscoll V, Olszewski C. 2008; Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users. J Am Acad Audiol 19 (02) 120-134
• Kang R, Nimmons GL, Drennan W, Longnion J, Ruffin C, Nie K, Won JH, Worman T, Yueh B, Rubinstein J. 2009; Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test. Ear Hear 30 (04) 411-418
• Laneau J, Wouters J, Moonen M. 2006; Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 11 (01) 38-52
• Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, Pérez-Mora R, Herrán B, Sanz L, de Sarriá MJ, Gavilán J. 2008; Changes in listening habits and quality of musical sound after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138 (03) 363-367
• Limb CJ. 2006; Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 14 (05) 337-340
• Limb CJ, Roy AT. 2014; Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 308: 13-26
• Loizou PC. 1998; Introduction to cochlear implants. IEEE Signal Process Mag 15: 101-130
• Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C, Hickson L. 2007; Comparisons of quality ratings for music by cochlear implant and hearing aid users. Ear Hear 28 (02) (Suppl) 59S-61S
• McDermott HJ. 2004; Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif 8 (02) 49-82
• Milczynski M, Wouters J, van Wieringen A. 2009; Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing. J Acoust Soc Am 125 (04) 2260-2271
• Mirza S, Douglas SA, Lindsey P, Hildreth T, Hawthorne M. 2003; Appreciation of music in adult patients with cochlear implants: a patient questionnaire. Cochlear Implants Int 4 (02) 85-95
• Nimmons GL, Kang RS, Drennan WR, Longnion J, Ruffin C, Worman T, Yueh B, Rubenstien JT. 2008; Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners. Otol Neurotol 29 (02) 149-155
• van Wieringen A, Wouters J. 2008; LIST and LINT: sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands. Int J Audiol 47 (06) 348-355
• Vickers E. 2010 The loudness war: background, speculation, and recommendations. In: Audio Engineering Society Convention 129. AES 129th Convention, San Francisco, CA, 2010 November 4–7, 2010
• Wright R, Uchanski RM. 2012; Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening. J Am Acad Audiol 23 (05) 350-365