Download PDF
J Am Acad Audiol 2018; 29(02): 106-117
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16077
Articles
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Predictive Accuracy of Sweep Frequency Impedance Technology in Identifying Conductive Conditions in Newborns

Venkatesh Aithal
*   Audiology Department, Townsville Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia
†   Hearing Research Unit for Children, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
,
Joseph Kei
†   Hearing Research Unit for Children, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
,
Carlie Driscoll
†   Hearing Research Unit for Children, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
,
Michio Murakoshi
‡   Biomechanical Engineering Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan
,
Hiroshi Wada
§   Department of Intelligent Information System, Tohoku Bunka Gakuen University, Sendai, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 May 2020 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background:

Diagnosing conductive conditions in newborns is challenging for both audiologists and otolaryngologists. Although high-frequency tympanometry (HFT), acoustic stapedial reflex tests, and wideband absorbance measures are useful diagnostic tools, there is performance measure variability in their detection of middle ear conditions. Additional diagnostic sensitivity and specificity measures gained through new technology such as sweep frequency impedance (SFI) measures may assist in the diagnosis of middle ear dysfunction in newborns.

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to determine the test performance of SFI to predict the status of the outer and middle ear in newborns against commonly used reference standards.

Research Design:

Automated auditory brainstem response (AABR), HFT (1000 Hz), transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE), distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE), and SFI tests were administered to the study sample.

Study Sample:

A total of 188 neonates (98 males and 90 females) with a mean gestational age of 39.4 weeks were included in the sample. Mean age at the time of testing was 44.4 hr.

Data Collection and Analysis:

Diagnostic accuracy of SFI was assessed in terms of its ability to identify conductive conditions in neonates when compared with nine different reference standards (including four single tests [AABR, HFT, TEOAE, and DPOAE] and five test batteries [HFT + DPOAE, HFT + TEOAE, DPOAE + TEOAE, DPOAE + AABR, and TEOAE + AABR]), using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and traditional test performance measures such as sensitivity and specificity.

Results:

The test performance of SFI against the test battery reference standard of HFT + DPOAE and single reference standard of HFT was high with an area under the ROC curve (AROC) of 0.87 and 0.82, respectively. Although the HFT + DPOAE test battery reference standard performed better than the HFT reference standard in predicting middle ear conductive conditions in neonates, the difference in AROC was not significant. Further analysis revealed that the highest sensitivity and specificity for SFI (86% and 88%, respectively) was obtained when compared with the reference standard of HFT + DPOAE. Among the four single reference standards, SFI had the highest sensitivity and specificity (76% and 88%, respectively) when compared against the HFT reference standard.

Conclusions:

The high test performance of SFI against the HFT and HFT + DPOAE reference standards indicates that the SFI measure has appropriate diagnostic accuracy in detection of conductive conditions in newborns. Hence, the SFI test could be used as adjunct tool to identify conductive conditions in universal newborn hearing screening programs, and can also be used in diagnostic follow-up assessments.

Key Words

dynamic behavior - high-frequency tympanometry - middle ear - multifrequency tympanometry - newborn - reference standards - resonance frequency - ROCs - sweep frequency impedance - test performance
 

  • REFERENCES

  • Aithal S, Aithal V, Kei J, Driscoll C. 2012; Conductive hearing loss and middle ear pathology in young infants referred through a newborn universal hearing screening program in Australia. J Am Acad Audiol 23 (09) 673-685
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Aithal S, Kei J, Driscoll C, Khan A. 2013; Normative wideband reflectance measures in healthy neonates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 77 (01) 29-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Aithal S, Kei J, Driscoll C, Khan A, Swanston A. 2015; a Wideband absorbance outcomes in newborns: a comparison with high-frequency tympanometry, automated brainstem response, and transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 36 (05) e237-e250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Aithal V, Kei J, Driscoll C, Murakoshi M, Wada H. 2016; Effects of ear canal static pressure on the dynamic behaviour of outer and middle ear in newborns. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 82: 64-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Aithal V, Kei J, Driscoll C, Swanston A, Murakoshi M, Wada H. 2015; b Sweep frequency impedance measures in Australian Aboriginal and Caucasian neonates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 79 (07) 1024-1029
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Aithal V, Kei J, Driscoll C, Swanston A, Roberts K, Murakoshi M, Wada H.. 2014; Normative sweep frequency impedance measures in healthy neonates. J Am Acad Audiol 25 (04) 343-354
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Alaerts J, Luts H, Wouters J. 2007; Evaluation of middle ear function in young children: clinical guidelines for the use of 226- and 1,000-Hz tympanometry. Otol Neurotol 28 (06) 727-732
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Allen JB, Jeng PS, Levitt H. 2005; Evaluation of human middle ear function via an acoustic power assessment. J Rehabil Res Dev 42 (04) (Suppl 2) 63-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin M. 2006; Choice of probe tone and classification of trace patterns in tympanometry undertaken in early infancy. Int J Audiol 45 (07) 417-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Balkany TJ, Berman SA, Simmons MA, Jafek BW. 1978; Middle ear effusions in neonates. Laryngoscope 88 (03) 398-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Baughman AL, Bisgard KM, Cortese MM, Thompson WW, Sanden GN, Strebel PM. 2008; Utility of composite reference standards and latent class analysis in evaluating the clinical accuracy of diagnostic tests for pertussis. Clin Vaccine Immunol 15 (01) 106-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Boone RT, Bower CM, Martin PF. 2005; Failed newborn hearing screens as presentation for otitis media with effusion in the newborn population. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 69 (03) 393-397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Boudewyns A, Declau F, Van den Ende J, Van Kerschaver E, Dirckx S, Hofkens-Van den Brandt A, Van de Heyning P.. 2011; Otitis media with effusion: an underestimated cause of hearing loss in infants. Otol Neurotol 32 (05) 799-804
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Buch NH, Jorgensen MB. 1964; Embroynic connective tissue in the tympanic cavity of the fetus and newborn. Acta Otolaryngica. 58: 111-126
    Google Scholar
  • Clemens CJ, Davis SA. 2001; Minimizing false-positives in universal newborn hearing screening: a simple solution. Pediatrics 107 (03) E29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Clemens CJ, Davis SA, Bailey AR. 2000; The false-positive in universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatrics 106 (01) E7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Derkay CS, Bluestone CD, Thompson AE, Stephenson JS, Kardtzke D.. 1988; Otitis media in the pediatric intensive care unit: a prospective study of its incidence, prevalence, bacteriology, etiology and treatment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 97 (Suppl 133) 56-57
    Google Scholar
  • Doyle KJ, Burggaaff B, Fujikawa S, Kim J, Macarthur CJ. 1997; Neonatal hearing screening with otoscopy, auditory brain stem response and otoacoustic emissions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116: 597-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Doyle KJ, Kong YY, Strobel K, Dallaire P, Ray RM. 2004; Neonatal middle ear effusion predicts chronic otitis media with effusion. Otol Neurotol 25 (03) 318-322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Doyle KJ, Rodgers P, Fujikawa S, Newman E. 2000; External and middle ear effects on infant hearing screening test results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122 (04) 477-481
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Ebell MH. 2016. Evidence-based practice for health professions: a free online course. Chapter 4: Diagnostic Tests-ROC Curves . Athens, Georgia: The University of Georgia, College of Public Health;
    Google Scholar
  • Gravel JS, White KR, Johnson JL, Widen JE, Vohr BR, James M, Kennalley T, Maxon AB, Spivak L, Sullivan-Mahoney M, Weirather Y, Meyer S.. 2005; A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: recommendations for policy, practice, and research. Am J Audiol 14 (02) S217-S228
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Hamanishi S, Murakoshi M, Steele C, Wada H, Puria S. 2015 A hybrid ear canal and middle ear model approach for neonates. 38th Annual Winter Meeting of Association for Research in Otolaryngology. Washington, DC February 21–25, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. 1982; The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143 (01) 29-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Holster IL, Hoeve LJ, Wieringa MH, Willis-Lorrier RM, de Gier HHW. 2009; Evaluation of hearing loss after failed neonatal hearing screening. J Pediatr 155 (05) 646-650
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Holte L, Cavanaugh Jr RM, Margolis RH. 1990; Ear canal wall mobility and tympanometric shape in young infants. J Pediatr 117 (1 Pt 1): 77-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Hunter LL, Blankenship CM. 2017. Middle ear measurement. In: Tharpe AM, Seewald R. Comprehensive Handbook of Pediatric Audiology. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing;
    Google Scholar
  • Hunter LL, Feeney MP, Lapsley Miller JA, Jeng PS, Bohning S. 2010; Wideband reflectance in newborns: normative regions and relationship to hearing-screening results. Ear Hear 31 (05) 599-610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Hunter LL, Keefe DH, Feeney MP, Fitzpatrick DF, Lin L. 2015; Longitudinal development of wideband reflectance tympanometry in normal and at-risk infants. Hear Res 340: 3-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Joint Committee on infant Hearing (JCIH) Year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. 2007; Pediatrics 120: 898-921
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Keefe DH, Bulen JC, Arehart KH, Burns EM. 1993; Ear-canal impedance and reflection coefficient in human infants and adults. J Acoust Soc Am 94 (05) 2617-2638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Keefe DH, Feeney MP. 2009. Principles of acoustic imittance and acoustic transfer functions. In: Katz J, Burkhard RF, Medwetsky L. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins;
    Google Scholar
  • Keefe DH, Folsom RC, Gorga MP, Vohr BR, Bulen JC, Norton SJ. 2000; Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: ear-canal measurements of acoustic admittance and reflectance in neonates. Ear Hear 21 (05) 443-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Keefe DH, Gorga MP, Neely ST, Zhao F, Vohr BR. 2003; Ear-canal acoustic admittance and reflectance measurements in human neonates. II. Predictions of middle-ear in dysfunction and sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 113 (01) 407-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Keefe DH, Levi E. 1996; Maturation of the middle and external ears: acoustic power-based responses and reflectance tympanometry. Ear Hear 17 (05) 361-373
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Kei J, Allison-Levick J, Dockray J, Harrys R, Kirkegard C, Wong J, Maurer M, Hegarty J, Young J, Tudehope D.. 2003; High-frequency (1000 Hz) tympanometry in normal neonates. J Am Acad Audiol 14 (01) 20-28
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Kei J, Mazlan R. 2012. High-frequency (1000 Hz) tympanometry: clinical applications. In: Kei J, Zhao F. Assessing Middle Ear Function in Infants. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 39-67
    Google Scholar
  • Kei J, Mazlan R, Hickson L, Gavranich J, Linning R. 2007; Measuring middle ear admittance in newborns using 1000 Hz tympanometry: a comparison of methodologies. J Am Acad Audiol 18 (09) 739-748
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Kei J, Zhao F. 2012. The challenge of assessing middle ear function in young infants: summary and future directions. In: Kei J, Zhao F. Assessing Middle Ear Function in Infants. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 163-177
    Google Scholar
  • Kok MR, van Zanten GA, Brocaar MP. 1992; Growth of evoked otoacoustic emissions during the first days postpartum: a preliminary report. Audiology 31 (03) 140-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Margolis RH, Bass-Ringdahl S, Hanks WD, Holte L, Zapala DA. 2003; Tympanometry in newborn infants—1 kHz norms. J Am Acad Audiol 14 (07) 383-392
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Margolis RH, Shanks JE. 1990. Tympanometry: basic principles and clinical applications. In: Rintelmann WF. Hearing Assessment. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 179-246
    Google Scholar
  • Mason JA, Herrmann KR. 1998; Universal infant hearing screening by automated auditory brainstem response measurement. Pediatrics 101 (02) 221-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Mazlan R, Kei J, Hickson L. 2009; Test-retest reliability of the acoustic stapedial reflex test in healthy neonates. Ear Hear 30 (03) 295-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Mehl AL, Thomson V. 1998; Newborn hearing screening: the great omission. Pediatrics 101: E4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Mehl AL, Thomson V. 2002; The Colorado newborn hearing screening project, 1992-1999: on the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatrics 109: E7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Merchant GR, Horton NJ, Voss SE. 2010; Normative reflectance and transmittance measurements on healthy newborn and 1-month-old infants. Ear Hear 31 (06) 746-754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Murakoshi M, Yoshida N, Sugaya M, Ogawa Y, Hamanishi S, Kiyokawa H, Kakuta R, Yamada M, Takahashi R, Tanigawara S, Matsutani S, Kobayashi T, Wada H.. 2013; Dynamic characteristics of the middle ear in neonates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 77 (04) 504-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Murakoshi M, Zhao F, Wada H. 2012. Current developments in the clinical application of the sweep frequency impedance (SFI) in assessing middle ear dysfunction. In: Kei J, Zhao F. Assessing Middle Ear Function in Infants. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 107-129
    Google Scholar
  • Naaktgeboren CA, Bertens LC, van Smeden M, de Groot JA, Moons KG, Reitsma JB. 2013; Value of composite reference standards in diagnostic research. BMJ 347: f5605
    Google Scholar
  • Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Widen JE, Folsom RC, Sininger Y, Cone-Wesson B, Vohr BR, Fletcher KA. 2000; a Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: summary and recommendations. Ear Hear 21 (05) 529-535
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Widen JE, Folsom RC, Sininger Y, Cone-Wesson B, Vohr BR, Mascher K, Fletcher K.. 2000; b Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance. Ear Hear 21 (05) 508-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Widen JE, Folsom RC, Sininger Y, Cone-Wesson B, Vohr BR, Fletcher KA. 2000; c Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: a multicenter investigation. Ear Hear 21 (05) 348-356
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Paradise JL. 1976; Pediatrician’s view of middle ear effusions: more questions than answers. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 85 (02) (Suppl 25 Pt 2) 20-24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Paradise JL. 1980; Otitis media in infants and children. Pediatrics 65 (05) 917-943
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Paradise JL. 1981; Otitis media during early life: how hazardous to development? A critical review of the evidence. Pediatrics 68 (06) 869-873
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Prieve BA, Feeney MP, Stenfelt S, Shahnaz N. 2013; a Prediction of conductive hearing loss using wideband acoustic immittance. Ear Hear 34 (01) (Suppl) 54S-59S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Prieve BA, Vander Werff KR, Preston JL, Georgantas L. 2013; b Identification of conductive hearing loss in young infants using tympanometry and wideband reflectance. Ear Hear 34 (02) 168-178
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Purdy SC, Williams SM. 2002; High frequency tympanometry: a valid and reliable immittance test protocol for young infants. NZ Audiolog Soc Bull 10: 9-24
    Google Scholar
  • Qi L, Liu H, Lutfy J, Funnell WR, Daniel SJ. 2006; A nonlinear finite-element model of the newborn ear canal. J Acoust Soc Am 120 (06) 3789-3798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Rhodes MC, Margolis RH, Hirsch JE, Napp AP. 1999; Hearing screening in the newborn intensive care nursery: comparison of methods. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120 (06) 799-808
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Rhoades K, McPherson B, Smyth V, Kei J, Baglioni A. 1998; Effects of background noise on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 19 (06) 450-462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenfeld RM, Culpepper L, Doyle KJ, Grundfast KM, Hoberman A, Kenna MA, Lieberthal AS, Mahoney M, Wahl RA, Woods Jr CR, Yawn B. American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Otitis Media with Effusion; American Academy of Family Physicians; American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. 2004; Clinical practice guideline: otitis media with effusion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130 (5, Suppl): S95-S118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Ruah CB, Schachern PA, Zelterman D, Paparella MM, Yoon TH. 1991; Age-related morphologic changes in the human tympanic membrane. A light and electron microscopic study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117 (06) 627-634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Sanford CA, Keefe DH, Liu Y-W, Fitzpatrick D, McCreery RW, Lewis DE, Gorga MP. 2009; Sound-conduction effects on distortion-product otoacoustic emission screening outcomes in newborn infants: test performance of wideband acoustic transfer functions and 1-kHz tympanometry. Ear Hear 30 (06) 635-652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Sanford CA, Schooling T, Frymark T. 2012; Determining the presence or absence of middle ear disorders: an evidence-based systematic review on the diagnostic accuracy of selected assessment instruments. Am J Audiol 21 (02) 251-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Sangster L. 2011. Critical Review: Can Wideband Energy Reflectance Be Used in Newborn Hearing Screening to Detect Transient Middle Ear Dysfunction and to Interpret Screening Results?. Ontario, Canada: University of Western Ontario; 1-6
    Google Scholar
  • Saunders JC, Kaltenback JA, Relkin EM. 1983. The structural and functional development of the outer and middle ear. In: Romand R, Romand MR. Development of Auditory and Vestibular Systems. New York, NY: Academic Press; 3-25
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shahnaz N. 2008; Wideband reflectance in neonatal intensive care units. J Am Acad Audiol 19 (05) 419-429
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Shi S, Kei J, Murdoch B, McPherson B, Smyth V, Latham S, Loscher J.. 2000; Paediatric hearing screening in the community: a comparison of outcomes from transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emission measures. Scand Audiol 29 (02) 83-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Shurin PA, Pelton SI, Klein JO.. 1976; Otitis media in the newborn infant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 85 (2, Suppl 25 Pt 2): 216-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Silverman CA. 2010. Multifrequency tympanometry in infants and children. Audiologyonline, www.audiologyonline.com/articles/multifrequency-tympanometry-in-infants-and-852
  • Stapells DR. 2000; Threshold estimation by the tone evoked auditory brainstem response: a literature meta-analysis. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 24: 74-83
    Google Scholar
  • Stapells DR. 2011. Frequency-specific threshold assessment in young infants using the transient ABR and the brainstem ASSR. In: Seewald R, Tharpe AM. Comprehensive Handbook of Pediatric Audiology. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 409-448
    Google Scholar
  • Swanepoel W, Werner S, Hugo R, Louw B, Owen R, Swanepoel A. 2007; High frequency immittance for neonates: a normative study. Acta Otolaryngol 127 (01) 49-56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Vander Werff KR, Prieve BA, Georgantas LM. 2007; Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions. Ear Hear 28 (05) 669-681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Vohr BR, Carty LM, Moore PE, Letourneau K. 1998; The Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Program: experience with statewide hearing screening (1993-1996). J Pediatr 133 (03) 353-357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Wada H, Kobayashi T. 1990; Dynamical behavior of middle ear: theoretical study corresponding to measurement results obtained by a newly developed measuring apparatus. J Acoust Soc Am 87 (01) 237-245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Wada H, Koike T, Kobayashi T. 1998; Clinical applicability of the sweep frequency measuring apparatus for diagnosis of middle ear diseases. Ear Hear 19 (03) 240-249
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Wada H, Murakoshi M, Aithal V, Swanston A.. 2016. Dynamic characteristic of the outer and middle ears in neonates . 33rd World Congress of Audiology; Vancouver, Canada:
    Google Scholar
  • Wada H, Ohyama K, Kobayashi T, Koike T, Noguchi S. 1995; Effect of middle ear on otoacoustic emissions. Audiology 34 (04) 161-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao F, Wang J. 2012. Assessing middle ear function in humans using multifrequency tympanometry: an overview. In: Kei J, Zhao F. Assessing Middle Ear Function in Infants. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 87-106
    Google Scholar