Download PDF
J Am Acad Audiol 2019; 30(04): 250-263
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15087
Articles
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Enhancing Screening Systems to Facilitate Hearing-Healthcare Access: A Qualitative Study

Kathleen F. Carlson
*   National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
†   Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
‡   Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
,
Sara Sell
*   National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
,
Jay Vachhani
*   National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
,
Robert L. Folmer
*   National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
‡   Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
,
Gabrielle Saunders
*   National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
‡   Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
,
M. Patrick Feeney
*   National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
‡   Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 May 2020 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background:

Although hearing loss is a common health issue, hearing healthcare (HHC) is poorly accessed. Screening to identify hearing loss is an important part of HHC access, specifically for those who screen positive for hearing loss and would benefit from seeing a HHC provider. New technologies can be automated to provide information and recommendations that are tailored to the needs of individual users, potentially enhancing rates of HHC access after positive screens. A greater understanding of the facilitators of postscreening HHC access that could be leveraged in such systems is needed.

Purpose:

The purpose of this project was to identify facilitators of postscreening HHC access that can be used in automated screening systems.

Research Design:

This qualitative study used focus groups (FGs) to understand perceived barriers, perceived benefits, and potential cues to action, as informed by the Health Belief Model, for accessing HHC after use of automated hearing screening systems.

Study Sample:

Fifty individuals participated in one of seven FGs. FGs were conducted separately with three types of stakeholders: four FGs included adults who reported some degree of perceived hearing loss and had recently completed a hearing screening; two FGs included adults who had recently sought HHC for the first time because of hearing loss; and one FG involved significant others/family members of individuals with hearing loss.

Data Collection and Analysis:

FGs were 60–90 minutes in length and were led by a trained facilitator following a discussion guide. A research audiologist was present at each FG and served as a notetaker. FGs were recorded and transcribed by research team members, and transcripts were then coded in an iterative process by multiple team members. Qualitative content analysis was used to reduce data and to identify salient themes and subthemes, following an inductive approach. We focused on identifying themes that were related to facilitators of HHC access after positive screens for hearing loss and, separately, potential enhancements to automated hearing screening systems that would leverage these facilitators to improve HHC access.

Results:

We identified five key themes related to HHC access after a positive screen for hearing loss, along with ideas for enhancing automated hearing screening systems based on these themes. The themes included knowledge, trust, access, quality of life, and interpersonal influence.

Conclusions:

The results of our work help inform the development of innovative hearing screening systems that can be automated to leverage individual facilitators of HHC access.

Key Words

audiology - auditory rehabilitation - hearing - hearing healthcare - kiosk - screening
 

  • REFERENCES

  • Bolin JN, Ory MG, Wilson AD, Salge L. 2013; Diabetes education kiosks in a Latino community. Diabetes Educ 39 (02) 204-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Brown HW, Rogers RG, Wise ME. 2016 Barriers to seeking care for accidental bowel leakage: a qualitative study. Int Urogynecol J [Epub ahead of print; November 14, 2016]
    Google Scholar
  • Cho JY, Lee E-H. 2014; Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: similarities and differences. Qual Rep 19 (64) 1-20
    Google Scholar
  • Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Fleming C, Beil T. 2011; Screening adults aged 50 years or older for hearing loss: a review of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 154 (05) 347-355
    Google Scholar
  • Corry DA, Leavey G. 2016; Adolescent trust and primary care: help-seeking for emotional and psychological difficulties. J Adolesc 54: 1-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage;
    Google Scholar
  • Dale LP, Whittaker R, Eyles H, Mhurchu CN, Ball K, Smith N, Maddison R. 2014; Cardiovascular disease self-management: pilot testing of an mHealth healthy eating program. J Pers Med 4 (01) 88-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • DiMatteo MR. 2004; Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 23 (02) 207-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Donahue A, Dubno JR, Beck L. 2010; Accessible and affordable hearing health care for adults with mild to moderate hearing loss. Ear Hear 31 (01) 2-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Eakin EG, Winkler EA, Dunstan DW, Healy GN, Owen N, Marshall AM, Graves N, Reeves MM. 2014; Living well with diabetes: 24-month outcomes from a randomized trial of telephone-delivered weight loss and physical activity intervention to improve glycemic control. Diabetes Care 37 (08) 2177-2185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Folmer RL, Saunders GH, Dann SL, Griest S, Porsov E, Fausti SA, Leek MR. 2012; Guest editorial: a computer-based hearing loss prevention education program for veterans and military personnel. J Rehabil Res Dev 49 (04) vii-xv
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Folmer RL, Vachhani J, McMillan GP, Watson C, Kidd GR, Feeney MP. 2017; Validation of a computer-administered version of the digits-in-noise test for hearing screening in the United States. J Am Acad Audiol 28 (02) 161-169
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Forbat L, Place M, Hubbard G, Leung H, Kelly D. 2014; The role of interpersonal relationships in men’s attendance in primary care: qualitative findings in a cohort of men with prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer 22 (02) 409-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Gates GA, Cooper Jr JC, Kannel WB, Miller NJ. 1990; Hearing in the elderly: the Framingham cohort, 1983-1985. Part I. Basic audiometric test results. Ear Hear 11 (04) 247-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Gaydos CA, Solis M, Hsieh YH, Jett-Goheen M, Nour S, Rothman RE. 2013; Use of tablet-based kiosks in the emergency department to guide patient HIV self-testing with a point-of-care oral fluid test. Int J STD AIDS 24 (09) 716-721
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Graneheim UH, Lundman B. 2004; Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 24 (02) 105-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Hands S. 2000; Hearing loss in over-65s: is routine questionnaire screening worthwhile?. J Laryngol Otol 114 (09) 661-666
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Ingo E, Brännström KJ, Andersson G, Lunner T, Laplante-Lévesque A. 2016; Measuring motivation using the transtheoretical (stages of change) model: a follow-up study of people who failed an online hearing screening. Int J Audiol 55 (Suppl 3) S52-S58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Joshi A, Puricelli Perin DM, Arora M. 2013; Using Portable Health Information kiosk to assess chronic disease burden in remote settings. Rural Remote Health 13 (02) 2279
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Knudsen LV, Laplante-Lévesque A, Jones L, Preminger JE, Nielsen C, Lunner T, Hickson L, Naylor G, Kramer SE. 2012; Conducting qualitative research in audiology: a tutorial. Int J Audiol 51: 83-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Knudsen LV, Nielsen C, Kramer SE, Jones L, Laplante-Lévesque A. 2013; Client labor: adults with hearing impairment describing their participation in their hearing help-seeking and rehabilitation. J Am Acad Audiol 24: 192-204
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Knudsen LV, Oberg M, Nielsen C, Naylor G, Kramer SE. 2010; Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature. Trends Amplif 14 (03) 127-154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Kramer SE, Allessie GH, Dondorp AW, Zekveld AA, Kapteyn TS. 2005; A home education program for older adults with hearing impairment and their significant others: a randomized trial evaluating short- and long-term effects. Int J Audiol 44 (05) 255-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Krueger RA, Casey MA. 2009. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage;
    Google Scholar
  • Laplante-Lévesque A, Knudsen LV, Preminger JE, Jones L, Nielsen C, Öberg M, Lunner T, Hickson L, Naylor G, Kramer SE. 2012; Hearing help-seeking and rehabilitation: perspectives of adults with hearing impairment. Int J Audiol 51 (02) 93-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Lin FR, Thorpe R, Gordon-Salant S, Ferrucci L. 2011; Hearing loss prevalence and risk factors among older adults in the United States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 66 (05) 582-590
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Madden M. 2010. Older Adults and Social Media. Pew Research Center; http://www.pewinternet.org/2010/08/27/older-adults-and-social-media/ . Accessed June 2, 2016
    Google Scholar
  • Meyer C, Hickson L. 2012; What factors influence help-seeking for hearing impairment and hearing aid adoption in older adults?. Int J Audiol 51 (02) 66-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer C, Hickson L, Khan A, Hartley D, Dillon H, Seymour J. 2011; Investigation of the actions taken by adults who failed a telephone-based hearing screen. Ear Hear 32 (06) 720-731
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Nash SD, Cruickshanks KJ, Huang GH, Klein BE, Klein R, Nieto FJ, Tweed TS. 2013; Unmet hearing health care needs: the Beaver dam offspring study. Am J Public Health 103 (06) 1134-1139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Preminger JE, Laplante-Lévesque A. 2014; Perceptions of age and brain in relation to hearing help-seeking and rehabilitation. Ear Hear 35 (01) 19-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Preminger JE, Meeks S. 2010; Evaluation of an audiological rehabilitation program for spouses of people with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 21 (05) 315-328
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Preminger JE, Oxenbøll M, Barnett MB, Jensen LD, Laplante-Lévesque A. 2015; Perceptions of adults with hearing impairment regarding the promotion of trust in hearing healthcare service delivery. Int J Audiol 54: 20-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Pronk M, Deeg DJH, Versfeld NJ, Heymans MW, Naylor G, Kramer SE. 2017; Predictors of entering a hearing aid evaluation period: a prospective study in older hearing-help seekers. Trends Hear 21: 1-20
    Google Scholar
  • Reavis KM, Tremblay KL, Saunders G. 2016; How can public health approaches and perspectives advance hearing health care?. Ear Hear 37 (04) 376-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Rosas LG, Trujillo C, Camacho J, Madrigal D, Bradman A, Eskenazi B. 2014; Acceptability of health information technology aimed at environmental health education in a prenatal clinic. Patient Educ Couns 97 (02) 244-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenstock I. 1966; Why people use health services. Milbank Mem Fund Q 44 (Suppl 3) 94-127
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saunders GH, Dann SM, Griest SE, Frederick MT. 2014; Development and evaluation of a questionnaire to assess knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors towards hearing loss prevention. Int J Audiol 53 (04) 209-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Saunders GH, Frederick MT, Silverman SC, Nielsen C, Laplante-Lévesque A. 2016; a Health behavior theories as predictors of hearing-aid uptake and outcomes. Int J Audiol 55: S59-S69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Saunders GH, Frederick MT, Silverman SC, Nielsen C, Laplante-Lévesque A. 2016; b Description of adults seeking hearing help for the first time according to two health behavior change approaches: transtheoretical model (stages of change) and health belief model. Ear Hear 37 (03) 324-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Saunders GH, Frederick MT, Silverman S, Papesh M. 2013; Application of the health belief model: development of the hearing beliefs questionnaire (HBQ) and its associations with hearing health behaviors. Int J Audiol 52 (08) 558-567
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Saunders GH, Vachhani JJ, Galvez G, Griest S. 2015; Formative evaluation of a multimedia self-administered computerized hearing loss prevention program. Int J Audiol 54 (04) 234-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Schluter P, Lee M, Hamilton G, Coe G, Messer-Perkins H, Smith B. 2015; Keep on brushing: a longitudinal study of motivational text messaging in young adults aged 18–24 years receiving work and income support. J Public Health Dent 75 (02) 118-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw C, Brittain K, Tansey R, Williams K. 2008; How people decide to seek healthcare: a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud 45 (10) 1516-1524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Silvey GM, Willis JM, Lobach DF. 2008; Deployment of health information kiosks in diverse community settings: experience and lessons learned. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 6: 1132
    Google Scholar
  • Smits C, Merkus P, Houtgast T. 2006; How we do it: the Dutch functional hearing-screening tests by telephone and internet. Clin Otolaryngol 31 (05) 436-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Stenfelt S, Janssen T, Schirkonyer V, Grandori F. 2011; e-Health technologies for adult hearing screening. Audiol Res 23 (01) e14
    Google Scholar
  • Stephenson CM, Stephenson MR. 2011; Hearing loss prevention for carpenters: part 1-using health communication and health promotion models to develop training that works. Noise Health 13: 113-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Swanepoel de W, Myburgh HC, Howe DM, Mahomed F, Eikelboom RH. 2014; Smartphone hearing screening with integrated quality control and data management. Int J Audiol 53 (12) 841-849
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Szudek J, Ostevik A, Dziegielewski P, Robinson-Anagor J, Gomaa N, Hodgetts B, Ho A. 2012; Can Uhear me now? Validation of an iPod-based hearing loss screening test. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 41 (Suppl 1) S78-84
    Google Scholar
  • Thodi C, Parazzini M, Kramer SE, Davis A, Stenfelt S, Janssen T, Smith P, Stephens D, Pronk M, Anteunis LI, Schirkonyer V, Grandori F. 2013; Adult hearing screening follow-up and outcomes. Am J Audiol 22 (01) 183-185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana R, Rowland J, Fincher M, Raza K, Stack RJ. 2015; Social interactions at the onset of rheumatoid arthritis and their influence on help-seeking behaviour: a qualitative exploration. Br J Health Psychol 20 (03) 648-661
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Watson CS, Kidd GR, Miller JD, Smits C, Humes LE. 2012; Telephone screening tests for functionally impaired hearing: current use in seven countries and development of a US version. J Am Acad Audiol 23 (10) 757-767
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • World Health Organization 2013. Millions of People in the Worlds Have Hearing Loss That Can Be Treated or Prevented. http://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/news/Millionslivewithhearingloss.pdf . Accessed June 2, 2016
    Google Scholar
  • Yueh B, Collins MP, Souza PE, Boyko EJ, Loovis CF, Heagerty PJ, Liu CF, Hedrick SC. 2010; Long-term effectiveness of screening for hearing loss: the screening for auditory impairment–which hearing assessment test (SAI-WHAT) randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 58 (03) 427-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Zokoll MA, Hochmuth S, Warzybok A, Wagener KC, Buschermöhle M, Kollmeier B. 2013; Speech-in-noise tests for multilingual hearing screening and diagnostics. Am J Audiol 22: 175-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar