J Am Acad Audiol 2016; 27(05): 388-394
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15040
American Academy of Audiology. All rights reserved. (2016) American Academy of Audiology

Recognition of Speech from the Television with Use of a Wireless Technology Designed for Cochlear Implants

Mila Morais Duke
Jace Wolfe
Erin Schafer
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 August 2020 (online)

Background: Cochlear implant (CI) recipients often experience difficulty understanding speech in noise and speech that originates from a distance. Many CI recipients also experience difficulty understanding speech originating from a television. Use of hearing assistance technology (HAT) may improve speech recognition in noise and for signals that originate from more than a few feet from the listener; however, there are no published studies evaluating the potential benefits of a wireless HAT designed to deliver audio signals from a television directly to a CI sound processor.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare speech recognition in quiet and in noise of CI recipients with the use of their CI alone and with the use of their CI and a wireless HAT (Cochlear Wireless TV Streamer).

Research Design: A two-way repeated measures design was used to evaluate performance differences obtained in quiet and in competing noise (65 dBA) with the CI sound processor alone and with the sound processor coupled to the Cochlear Wireless TV Streamer.

Study Sample: Sixteen users of Cochlear Nucleus 24 Freedom, CI512, and CI422 implants were included in the study.

Data Collection and Analysis: Participants were evaluated in four conditions including use of the sound processor alone and use of the sound processor with the wireless streamer in quiet and in the presence of competing noise at 65 dBA. Speech recognition was evaluated in each condition with two full lists of Computer-Assisted Speech Perception Testing and Training Sentence-Level Test sentences presented from a light-emitting diode television.

Results: Speech recognition in noise was significantly better with use of the wireless streamer compared to participants’ performance with their CI sound processor alone. There was also a nonsignificant trend toward better performance in quiet with use of the TV Streamer. Performance was significantly poorer when evaluated in noise compared to performance in quiet when the TV Streamer was not used.

Conclusions: Use of the Cochlear Wireless TV Streamer designed to stream audio from a television directly to a CI sound processor provides better speech recognition in quiet and in noise when compared to performance obtained with use of the CI sound processor alone.