Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2017; 30(01): 62-68
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-16-05-0071
Clinical Communication
Schattauer GmbH

Kirschner wire fixation of Salter-Harris type IV fracture of the lateral aspect of the humeral condyle in growing dogs

A retrospective study of 35 fractures
Filippo Cinti
1   Centro Veterinario Luni Mare, Luni Mare-Ortonovo, Italy
2   Clinica Veterinaria Vezzoni, Cremona, Italy
,
Guido Pisani
1   Centro Veterinario Luni Mare, Luni Mare-Ortonovo, Italy
,
Luca Vezzoni
2   Clinica Veterinaria Vezzoni, Cremona, Italy
,
Bruno Peirone
3   Department of Veterinary Science, School of Veterinary Medicine Turin, Grugliasco, Italy
,
Aldo Vezzoni
2   Clinica Veterinaria Vezzoni, Cremona, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 11 May 2016

Accepted: 10 October 2016

Publication Date:
26 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Objectives: To evaluate the use of Kirschner wires for treatment of fractures of the lateral aspect of the humeral condyle in growing dogs.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 35 elbow fractures (33 dogs) of the lateral aspect of the humeral condyle treated by insertion of multiple transcondylar and one anti-rotational Kirschner wires. Radiographic and clinical re-evaluations were carried out immediately after surgery, at four weeks and, when required, at eight weeks postoperatively. Long-term follow-up was planned after a minimum of six months. The relationship between different implant configurations and clinical outcome was analysed statistically.

Results: Complete functional recovery was seen in 31 elbows (30 dogs), three elbows (2 dogs) had reduction in the range of motion, and one elbow (1 dog) had persistent grade 1 lameness two months postoperatively. Major complications occurred in eight elbows (8 dogs) and all were resolved by implant removal. Implant configuration did not affect outcome. Long-term evaluation in 12 cases with a mean follow-up of four years showed absence of lameness, normal function and no or mild radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis in 11 cases.

Clinical significance: Fracture of the lateral aspect of the humeral condyle in growing dogs can be successfully treated by multiple transcondylar convergent or parallel Kirschner wires, resulting in adequate fracture healing.

 
  • References

  • 1 Bardet JF., Hohn RB., Rudy RL.. et al. Fractures of the humerus in dogs and cats: A retrospective study of 130 cases. Vet Surg 1983; 12: 73-77.
  • 2 Denny HR.. Condylar fractures of the humerus in the dog: A review of 133 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1983; 24: 185-197.
  • 3 Rorvik A.. Risk factors for humeral condylar fractures in the dog: a retrospective study. J Small Anim Pract 1993; 34: 277-281.
  • 4 Piermattei DL., Flo GL.. Fractures of the humerus. In: Brinker, Piermattei, and Flo’s Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 3rd edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1997: 261-287.
  • 5 Vannini R., Olmstead ML., Smeak DD.. An epidemiological study of 151 distal humeral fractures in dogs and cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1988; 24: 531-536.
  • 6 Tomlinson JL.. Fractures of the Humerus. In: Slatter D.. editor. Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. 3rd edition Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002: 1905-1918.
  • 7 Brinker WO., Braden TD.. Fractures in immature animals. In: Brinker WO., Hohn RB., Prieur WD.. editors. Manual of Internal Fixation in Small Animal. 1st edition New York: Springer-Verlag; 1984: 225-238.
  • 8 Carmichael S.. Fractures in Skeletally Immature Animals. In: Coughlan AR., Miller A.. editors. Manual of Small Animal Fracture Repair and Management. 1st edition Cheltenham: British Small Animal Veterinary Association; 1998: 103-111.
  • 9 Hayes GM., Radke H., Langley-Hobbs SJ.. Salter-Harris type III fractures of the distal humerus in two dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 478-482.
  • 10 Marcellin-Little DJ., DeYoung DJ., Ferris KK.. et al. Incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle in Spaniels. Vet Surg 1994; 23: 475-487.
  • 11 Moores AP., Agthe P., Schaafsma IA.. Prevalence of incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle and other abnormalities of the elbow in English Springer Spaniels. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 211-216.
  • 12 Robin D., Marcellin-Little DJ.. Incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle in two Labrador Retrievers. J Small Anim Pract 2001; 42: 231-234.
  • 13 Rovesti GL., Fluckiger M., Margini A.. et al. Fragmented coronoid process and incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle in a rottweiler. Vet Surg 1998; 27: 354-357.
  • 14 Morshead D., Stambaugh JE.. Kirschner wire fixation of lateral humeral condylar fractures in small dogs. Vet Surg 1984; 13: 1-5.
  • 15 Tomlinson JL., Constantinescu GM.. Fixation of Lateral Humeral Condylar Fractures with Multiple Kirschner Wires. In: Bojarab MJ., Slocum B., Ellison GW.. editors. Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery. 4th edition Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1997: 1019-1021.
  • 16 Lanz OI., Lewis DD., Newell SM.. Stabilization of a physeal fracture using an orthofix partially-threaded Kirschner wire. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999; 12: 88-91.
  • 17 Guille AE., Daniel DL., Anderson TP.. et al. Evaluation of surgical repair of humeral condylar fractures using self-compressing Orthofix pins in 23 dogs. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 314-322.
  • 18 Turner TM., Hohn RB.. Craniolateral approach for repair of condylar fracture or joint exploration. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1980; 176: 1264-1266.
  • 19 Cook JL., Tomlinson JL., Reed AL.. Fluoroscopically guided closed reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the lateral portion of the humeral condyle: prospective clinical study of the technique and results in ten dogs. Vet Surg 1999; 28: 315-321.
  • 20 Lewis DD., Redasch RM., Beale BS.. Result of screw/wire/polymethyl-methacrylate composite fixation for acetabular fracture repair in 14 dogs. Vet Surg 1997; 26: 223-234.
  • 21 Jaegger G., Marcellin-Little DJ., Levine D.. Reliability of goniometry in Labradors Retrievers. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63: 979-984.
  • 22 Lang J., Busato A., Baumgartner D.. et al. Comparison of two classification protocols in the evaluation of elbow dysplasia in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 169-174.
  • 23 Carrera I., Hammond GJ., Sullivan M.. Computed tomographic features of incomplete ossification of the canine humeral condyle. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 226-231.
  • 24 Morgan ODE., Reetz JA., Brown DC.. et al. Complication rate, outcome, and risk factors associated with surgical repair of fractures of the lateral aspect of the humeral condyle in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 400-405.
  • 25 Langley-Hobbs SJ.. Fractures of the humerus. In: Tobias KM., Jhonston SA.. editors. Veterinary Surgery Small Animal. Volume 1 Oxford: Elsevier; 2012: 709-720.
  • 26 Johnson AL., Hulse DA.. Management of Specific Fractures. In: Fossum TW.. editor. Small Animal Surgery. 2nd edition St. Louis: Mosby; 2002: 931-938.
  • 27 Perry KL., Bruce M., Woods S.. et al. Effect of fixation method on postoperative complication rates after surgical stabilization of lateral humeral condylar fractures in dogs. Vet Surg 2015; 44: 246-255.
  • 28 Lembrechts NE., Verstraete FJM., Sumner-Smith G.. et al. Internal fixation of femoral neck fracture in the dog-an in vitro study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1993; 6: 188-191.
  • 29 Lefebvre JB., Robertson TR., Baines SJ.. et al. Assessment of humeral length in dogs after repair of Salter-Harris type IV fracture of the lateral part of the humeral condyle. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 545-549.
  • 30 Sumner-Smith G.. Observations on epiphyseal fusion in the canine appendicular skeleton. J Small Anim Pract 1966; 303-306.
  • 31 Manley P., Henry W., Wilson J.. Disease of the epiphyses. In: Whittick WG.. editor. Canine orthopaedics. 2nd edition Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1990: 597-600.
  • 32 Gordon WJ., Besancon MF., Conzemius MG.. et al. Frequency of post-traumatic osteoarthritis in dogs after repair of a humeral condylar fracture. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 1-5.