Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28(05): 318-322
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-15-02-0037
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Variability of vertical ground reaction forces collected with one and two force plates in healthy dogs

M. Stejskal
1   Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
,
B. T. Torres
1   Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
,
G. S. Sandberg
1   Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
,
J. A. Sapora
1   Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
,
R. K. Dover
1   Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
,
S. C. Budsberg
1   Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received:19 February 2015

Accepted:04 June 2015

Publication Date:
28 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: To compare peak vertical force (PVF) and vertical impulse (VI) data collected with one and two force plates during the same collection time period in healthy dogs at a trot.

Animals: Seventeen healthy client-owned adult dogs.

Methods: Vertical ground reaction force (GRF) data were collected in a crossover study design, with four sessions on two consecutive days, and then two weeks apart (days 1, 2, 15, and 16) using both one and two force plates collection methods. A repeated measures model analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for differences in force plate PVF, VI, and average time per trial (ATT) between days, weeks, and systems (1 plate versus 2 plates). Coefficients of variation for PVF and VI were also calculated separately by forelimbs and hindlimbs, plates, day, and week.

Results: The time required to obtain a valid trial was significantly longer using a single force plate when compared with two force plates. Comparing GRF data for all dogs, significant differences in PVF data were found between one and two force plates, however, these differences were diminutive in absolute magnitude, and of unknown clinical importance. Examination of the coefficients of variation for PVF and VI during the different collection periods yielded similar results.

Conclusions: Use of two force plates decreased trial repetition and collection time. Vertical GRF data had a similar coefficient of variation with either one or two force plates collection techniques in healthy dogs.

Keywords

Kinetic - ground reaction forces - canine
 

  • References

  • 1 Evans R, Horstman C, Conzemius M. Accuracy and optimization of force platform gait analysis in Labradors with cranial cruciate disease evaluated at a walking gait. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 445-449.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 McLaughlin RM. Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis in dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2001; 31: 193-201.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Voss K, Imhof J, Kaestner S. et al. Force plate gait analysis at the walk and trot in dogs with low-grade hindlimb lameness. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 299-304.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Budsberg SC. Long-term temporal evaluation of ground reaction forces during development of experimentally induced osteoarthritis in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 1207-1211.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Soutas-Little RW. Force plate analysis of the walking gait in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1987; 48: 915-918.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Soutas-Little RW. et al. Force plate analyses before and after stabilization of canine stifles for cruciate injury. Am J Vet Res 1988; 49: 1522-1524.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hans EC, Zwarthoed B, Seliski J. et al. Variance associated with subject velocity and trial repetition during force platform gait analysis in a heterogeneous population of clinically normal dogs. Vet J 2014; 202: 498-502.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Molsa SH, Hielm-Bjorkman AK, Laitinen-Vapaavuori OM. Force platform analysis in clinically healthy Rottweilers: comparison with Labrador Retrievers. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 701-707.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Moreau M, Lussier B, Pelletier J-P, et al. Does a placebo effect really occur in dogs afflicted by hip osteoarthritis as measured by force platform gait analysis?. BMC Vet Res 2013; 9: 260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Beraud R, Moreau M, Lussier B. Effect of exercise on kinetic gait analysis of dogs afflicted by osteoarthritis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 87-92.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Budsberg SC, Johnston SA, Schwarz PD. et al. Efficacy of etodolac for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip joints in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 214: 206-210.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Molsa SH, Hyytiainen HK, Hielm-Bjorkman AK. et al. Long-term functional outcome after surgical repair of cranial cruciate ligament disease in dogs. BMC Vet Res 2014; 10: 266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Moreau M, Lussier B, Pelletier JP. et al. A medicinal herb-based natural health product improves the condition of a canine natural osteoarthritis model: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Res Vet Sci 2014; 97: 574-581.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Voss K, Damur DM, Guerrero T. et al. Force plate gait analysis to assess limb function after tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 243-249.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bertram JE, Lee DV, Case HN. et al. Comparison of the trotting gaits of Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds. Am J Vet Res 2000; 61: 832-838.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bockstahler BA, Skalicky M, Peham C. et al. Reliability of ground reaction forces measured on a treadmill system in healthy dogs. Vet J 2007; 173: 373-378.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Budsberg SC, Torres BT, Zwijnenberg RJ. et al. Effect of perzinfotel and a proprietary phospholipase A(2) inhibitor on kinetic gait and subjective lameness scores in dogs with sodium urate-induced synovitis. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72: 757-763.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Cathcart CJ, Johnston SA, Reynolds LR. et al. Efficacy of ABT-116, an antagonist of transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1, in providing analgesia for dogs with chemically induced synovitis. Am J Vet Res 2012; 73: 19-26.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 DuLaney D, Purinton T, Dookwah H. et al. Effect of starting distance on vertical ground reaction forces in the normal dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 183-185.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kennedy S, Lee D, Bertram J. et al. Gait evaluation in hip osteoarthritic and normal dogs using a serial force plate system. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 170-177.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kim J, Kazmierczak KA, Breur GJ. Comparison of temporospatial and kinetic variables of walking in small and large dogs on a pressure-sensing walkway. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72: 1171-1177.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Krotscheck U, Todhunter RJ, Nelson SA. et al. Precision and accuracy of ground reaction force normalization in a heterogeneous population of dogs. Vet Surg 2014; 43: 437-445.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lascelles BD, Roe SC, Smith E. et al. Evaluation of a pressure walkway system for measurement of vertical limb forces in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 277-282.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Light VA, Steiss JE, Montgomery RD. et al. Temporal-spatial gait analysis by use of a portable walkway system in healthy Labrador Retrievers at a walk. Am J Vet Res 2010; 71: 997-1002.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Oosterlinck M, Bosmans T, Gasthuys F. et al. Accuracy of pressure plate kinetic asymmetry indices and their correlation with visual gait assessment scores in lame and nonlame dogs. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72: 820-825.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Punke JP, Speas AL, Reynolds LR. et al. Kinetic gait and subjective analysis of the effects of a tachykinin receptor antagonist in dogs with sodium urate-induced synovitis. Am J Vet Res 2007; 68: 704-708.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Jevens DJ, Hauptman JG, DeCamp CE. et al. Contributions to variance in force-plate analysis of gait in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 612-615.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 McLaughlin Jr RM ., Roush JK. Effects of subject stance time and velocity on ground reaction forces in clinically normal greyhounds at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1994; 55: 1666-1671.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Punke JP, Speas AL, Reynolds LR. et al. Measurement differences between three versus five photocells during collection of ground reaction forces in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 98-101.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Riggs CM, DeCamp CE, Soutas-Little RW. et al. Effects of subject velocity on force plate-measured ground reaction forces in healthy greyhounds at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 1523-1526.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Roush JK, McLaughlin Jr RM .. Effects of subject stance time and velocity on ground reaction forces in clinically normal greyhounds at the walk. Am J Vet Res 1994; 55: 1672-1676.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Rumph PF, Steiss JE, Montgomery RD. Effects of selection and habituation on vertical ground reaction force in greyhounds. Am J Vet Res 1997; 58: 1206-1208.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Voss K, Galeandro L, Wiestner T. et al. Relationships of body weight, body size, subject velocity, and vertical ground reaction forces in trotting dogs. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 863-869.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Voss K, Wiestner T, Galeandro L. et al. Effect of dog breed and body conformation on vertical ground reaction forces, impulses, and stance times. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 106-112.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Evans R, Gordon W, Conzemius M. Effect of velocity on ground reaction forces in dogs with lameness attributable to tearing of the cranial cruciate ligament. Am J Vet Res 2003; 64: 1479-1481.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Besancon M, Conzemius M, Derrick T. et al. Comparison of vertical forces in normal greyhounds between force platform and pressure walkway measurement systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 153-157.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Budsberg SC, Jevens DJ, Brown J. et al. Evaluation of limb symmetry indices, using ground reaction forces in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 1569-1574.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Fanchon L, Grandjean D. Accuracy of asymmetry indices of ground reaction forces for diagnosis of hind limb lameness in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2007; 68: 1089-1094.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Cross AR, Budsberg SC, Keefe TJ. Kinetic gait analysis assessment of meloxicam efficacy in a sodium urate-induced synovitis model in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1997; 58: 626-631.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Al-Nadaf S, Torres BT, Budsberg SC. Comparison of two methods for analyzing kinetic gait data in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2012; 73: 189-193.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Colborne GR, Innes JF, Comerford EJ. et al. Distribution of power across the hind limb joints in Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66: 1563-1571.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Rumph PF, Kincaid SA, Baird DK. et al. Vertical ground reaction force distribution during experimentally induced acute synovitis in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 365-369.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Rumph PF, Lander JE, Kincaid SA. et al. Ground reaction force profiles from force platform gait analyses of clinically normal mesomorphic dogs at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1994; 55: 756-761.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar