Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28(02): 109-115
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-14-08-0120
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Impact of fixation method on postoperative complication rates following surgical stabilization of diaphyseal tibial fractures in cats

K. L. Perry
1   The Royal Veterinary College, Veterinary Clinical Sciences and Services, Hatfield, UK
,
M. Bruce
2   The Royal Veterinary College, Production and Population Health, Hatfield, UK
› Author Affiliations Financial Support The authors declare that no financial support or funding was received.
Further Information

Publication History

Received:08 August 2014

Accepted:16 February 2014

Publication Date:
26 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: To compare the complication rate between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and external skeletal fixation (ESF) for feline diaphyseal tibial fractures.

Methods: In a retrospective study spanning a 10 year period, 57 feline tibial fractures stabilized via ESF or ORIF were included for analysis and complication rates were compared between the two methods.

Results: In the overall study population, 23 (40.4%) cases suffered complications (9 major, 20 minor, 6 with both major and minor). All of the major complications occurred in the ESF group. Complications were more common in cats with ESF (50.0%) while only one (7.7%) of the ORIF cases suffered complications (OR 12.0 [CI: 2.09; 228.10], p = 0.02). Use of postoperative antibiotic medications was identified as a confounder. After adjusting for confounding, stabilization using ESF remained associated with a higher risk of complications (OR = 13.71 [CI: 2.18; 274.25], p = 0.02). Cats with ESF had a longer duration of follow-up (15.6 weeks; 95% CI: 13.0; 18.3) compared to ORIF (9.5 weeks; 95% CI: 6.4; 12.7) (p = 0.003), and a higher number of revisits (mean 3.0; 95% CI: 2.4; 3.6) than the ORIF group (mean 1.6; 95% CI: 0.9; 2.3) (p = 0.002).

Clinical significance: This study demonstrates a significant difference in complication rates between the methods of stabilization, with ESF resulting in a significantly higher complication rate compared to ORIF. Based on these results, it may be prudent to select ORIF for stabilization of feline tibial fractures wherever practical.

Keywords

Tibial fracture - feline - complication - external skeletal fixation - open reduction internal fixation
 

  • References

  • 1 Harari J. Treatments for feline long bone fractures. Vet Clin Small Anim 2002; 32: 927-947.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nolte DM, Fusco JV, Peterson ME. Incidence of and predisposing factors for non-union of fractures involving the appendicular skeleton in cats: 18 cases (1998-2002). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 226: 77-82.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hill FWG. A survey of bone fractures in the cat. J Small Anim Pract 1977; 18: 457-463.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Knecht CD. Fractures in cats: A survey of 100 cases. Feline Practice 1978; 8: 43-46.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Boone EG, Johnson AL, Montavon P. et al. Fractures of the tibial diaphysis in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1986; 188: 41-45.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Richardson EF, Thacher CW. Tibial fractures in cats. Compend Cont Educ 1993; 15: 383-393.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 DeAngelis MP. Causes of delayed and non-union of fractures. Vet Clin North Am 1975; 5: 251-258.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lu C, Miclau T, Hu D. et al. Ischaemia leads to delayed union during fracture healing: A mouse model. J Orthop Res 2007; 25: 51-61.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Schrader SC. Orthopaedic surgery. In Sherding RG. editor The Cat: Clinical Diseases and Clinical Management. 2nd edition. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994: 1649-1710.
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Johnson AL, Kneller SK, Weigel RM. Radial and tibial fracture repair with external skeletal fixation: Effects of fracture type, reduction and complications on healing. Vet Surg 1989; 18: 367-372.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gemmill TJ, Cave TA, Clements DN. et al. Treatment of canine and feline diaphyseal radial and tibial fractures with low-stiffness external skeletal fixation. J Small Anim Pract 2004; 45: 85-91.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rovesti GL, Bosio A, Marcellin-Little DJ. Management of 49 antebrachial and crural fractures in dogs using circular external fixators. J Small Anim Pract 2007; 48: 194-200.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Guiot L, Dejardin LM. Prospective evaluation of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in 36 nonarticular tibial fractures in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 171-182.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Schmokel HG, Stein S, Radke H. et al. Treatment of tibial fractures with plates using minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis in dogs and cats. J Small Anim Pract 2007; 48: 157-160.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Dudley M, Johnson AL, Olmstead M. et al. Open reduction and bone plate stabilisation, compared with closed reduction and external fixation for treatment of comminuted tibial fractures: 47 cases (1980-1995) in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997; 211: 1008-1012.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Reems MR, Beale BS, Hulse DA. Use of a plate-rod construct and principles of biological osteosynthesis for repair of diaphyseal fractures in dogs and cats: 47 cases (1994-2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 223: 330-335.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Sarrau S, Meige F, Autefage A. Treatment of femoral and tibial fractures in puppies by elastic plate osteosynthesis. A review of 17 cases. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 51-58.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gerber C, Mast JW, Ganz R. Biological internal fixation of fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1990; 109: 295-303.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84: 1093-1110.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T. et al. Effects of percutaneous and conventional plating techniques on the blood supply to the femur. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998; 117: 438-441.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Brinker WO, Flo GL. Principles and application of external skeletal fixation. Vet Clin North Am 1975; 5: 197-208.
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Bradley RL, Rouse GP. External skeletal fixation using the through and through Kirschner-Ehmer splint. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1980; 16: 523-530.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Roe SC, Johnson AL, Harari J. Placement of multiple full pins for external skeletal fixation: technique and results in four dogs. Vet Surg 1985; 14: 247-251.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Egger EL, Rigg DL, Blass CE. et al. Type I biplanar configuration of external skeletal fixation: application technique in nine dogs and one cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985; 187: 262-267.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Egger EL, Runyon CL, Rigg DL. Use of Type I double-connecting bar configuration of external skeletal fixation on long bone fractures in dogs: a review of 10 cases. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 57-64.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Aron DN, Toombs JP, Hollingsworth SC. Primary treatment of severe fractures by external skeletal fixation: threaded pins compared with smooth pins. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 659-670.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Johnson AL, Seitz SE, Smith CW. et al. Closed reduction and type II external skeletal fixation of comminuted fractures of the radius and tibia in dogs: 23 cases (1990-1994). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996; 209: 1445-1448.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Foland MA, Egger EL. Application of type 3 external fixators: a review of 23 clinical fractures in 20 dogs and 2 cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1991; 27: 193-202.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Palmer RH, Hulse DA, Hyman WA. et al. Principles of bone healing and biomechanics of external skeletal fixation. Vet Clin N Am 1992; 22: 45-68.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bouvy BM, Markel MD, Chelikani S. et al. Ex vivo biomechanics of Kirschner-Ehmer external skeletal fixation applied to canine tibiae. Vet Surg 1993; 22: 194-207.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Piermattei DL, Flo GL. Fractures, classification, diagnosis and treatment. In Piermattei DL, Flo GL. editors Handbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics and Fracture Repair. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1997: 51-52.
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Weese JS. A Review of post-operative infections in veterinary orthopaedic surgery. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 99-100.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Fitzpatrick N, Solano MA. Predictive variables for complications after TPLO with stifle inspection by arthrotomy in 1000 consecutive dogs. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 460-474.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sauerbrei W, Meier-Hirmer A, Benner C. et al. Multivariable regression model building by using fractional polynomials: Description of SAS, STATA and R programs. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2006; 50: 3464-3485.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Maldonado G, Greenland S. Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 138: 923-936.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Phillips IR. A survey of bone fractures in the dog and cat. J Small Anim Pract 1979; 20: 661-674.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Egger EL, Histand MB, Norrdin RW. et al. Canine Osteotomy healing when stabilised with decreasingly rigid fixation compared to constantly rigid fixation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1993; 6: 182-187.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Classen DC, Evans RS, Pestotnik SL. et al. The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 281-286.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar