Computed tomographic and histological findings of Hansen type I intervertebral disc herniation in dogs

Summary

Objective: To evaluate whether noncontrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) as a stand-alone imaging modality can be used to define the Hansen type I intervertebral disc herniation (IVDH) lesion and also whether the Hounsfield unit (HU) value of herniated disc is relevant to clinical duration and to histopathological chronicity of extruded disc material.

Methods: Information from a series of CT studies performed on 45 dogs with a presumptive diagnosis of Hansen type I IVDH was used. Clinical duration of IVDH was estimated based on time from onset of signs per owner communication to time of surgical intervention. Hansen type I IVDH was confirmed at surgery. Retrieved herniated disc was histologically examined. The HU values were analyzed to correlate the clinical duration and histopathological chronicity of the disc lesion.

Results: Non-contrast-enhanced CT provided sufficient diagnostic information to plan surgery in 42 of 45 dogs (93%). The value of the HU was significantly higher in clinically chronic cases (n = 12) compared to peracute cases (n = 11) (p <0.05). The HU values were significantly correlated with clinical duration (r = 0.482, p = 0.0008) and histopathological chronicity of the herniated disc (r = 0.408, p = 0.0056).

Conclusion: Consistent with the previous reports, the use of non-contrast-enhanced CT alone was sufficient for the diagnosis and surgical planning in most patients with Hansen type I IVDH in the thoracolumbar spine. In addition, the present study suggested that HU values on CT images may be useful in the evaluation of disease chronicity of IVDH.

Keywords

Histopathology - computed tomography - Hounsfield units - dog - intervertebral disc herniation

• References

• 1 Hansen HJ. A pathologic-anatomical study on disc degeneration in dog, with special reference to the so-called enchondrosis intervertebralis. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1952; 11: 1-117.
• 2 Brisson BA. Intervertebral disc disease in dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2010; 40: 829-858.
• 3 Lexmaulova L, Zatloukal J, Proks P. et al. Incidence of seizures associated with iopamidol or iomeprol myelography in dogs with intervertebral disk disease: 161 cases (2000-2002). J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2009; 19: 611-616.
• 4 Packer RA, Bergman RL, Coates JR. et al. Intracranial subarachnoid hemorrhage following lumbar myelography in two dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007; 48: 323-327.
• 5 Barone G, Ziemer LS, Shofer FS. et al. Risk factors associated with development of seizures after use of iohexol for myelography in dogs: 182 cases (1998). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 220: 1499-1502.
• 6 Carroll GL, Keene BW, Forrest LJ. Asystole associated with iohexol myelography in a dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1997; 38: 284-287.
• 7 Olby NJ, Munana KR, Sharp NJ. et al. The computed tomographic appearance of acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disc herniations in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000; 41: 396-402.
• 8 Hecht S, Thomas WB, Marioni-Henry K. et al. Myelography vs. computed tomography in the evaluation of acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disk extrusion in chondrodystrophic dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009; 50: 353-359.
• 9 Israel SK, Levine JM, Kerwin SC. et al. The relative sensitivity of computed tomography and myelography for identification of thoracolumbar intervertebral disk herniations in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009; 50: 247-252.
• 10 Shimizu J, Yamada K, Mochida K. et al. Comparison of the diagnosis of intervertebral disc herniation in dogs by CT before and after contrast enhancement of the subarachnoid space. Vet Rec 2009; 165: 200-202.
• 11 Drees R, Dennison SE, Keuler NS. et al. Computed tomographic imaging protocol for the canine cervical and lumbar spine. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009; 50: 74-79.
• 12 Dennison SE, Drees R, Rylander H. et al. Evaluation of different computed tomography techniques and myelography for the diagnosis of acute canine myelopathy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010; 51: 254-258.
• 13 Albeck MJ, Hilden J, Kjaer L. et al. A controlled comparison of myelography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in clinically suspected lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995; 20: 443-448.
• 14 Fagerlund MK, Thelander UE. Comparison of myelography and computed tomography in establishing lumbar disc herniation. Acta Radiol 1989; 30: 241-246.
• 15 Gillstrom P, Ericsson K, Hindmarsh T. A comparison of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1986; 106: 12-14.
• 16 Bosacco SJ, Berman AT, Garbarino JL. et al. A comparison of CT scanning and myelography in the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; 124-128.
• 17 Tidwell AS. Principles of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. In: Thrall DE. eds. Textbook of Veterinary Diagnostic Radiology. St. Louis: Saunders Elesvier; 2007. p. 2007-50.
• 18 Olby NJ, Munana KR, Sharp NJH. et al. A comparison of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of acute intervertebral disc disease in dogs (in Proceedings). Am Coll Vet Intern Med. 1999 17. 705.
• 19 Hunter CJ, Matyas JR, Duncan NA. Cytomorphology of notochordal and chondrocytic cells from the nucleus pulposus: a species comparison. J Anat 2004; 205: 357-362.
• 20 Bray JP, Burbidge HM. The canine intervertebral disk. Part Two: Degenerative changes--nonchondrodystrophoid versus chondrodystrophoid disks. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1998; 34: 135-144.
• 21 Merck MD. CSI: The animal as evidence. In: Merck MD. editor. Veterinary Forensics. Ames: Blackwell Publishing; 2007. p. 2007-31.
• 22 Oehmichen M, Walter T, Meissner C. et al. Time course of cortical hemorrhages after closed traumatic brain injury: statistical analysis of posttraumatic histomorphological alterations. J Neurotrauma 2003; 20: 87-103.
• 23 Betz P. Histological and enzyme histochemical parameters for the age estimation of human skin wounds. Int J Legal Med 1994; 107: 60-68.
• 24 Royal AB, Chigerwe M, Coates JR. et al. Cytologic and histopathologic evaluation of extruded canine degenerate disks. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 798-802.
• 25 Robertson I, Thrall DE. Imaging dogs with suspected disc herniation: pros and cons of myelography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011; 52: S81-84.
• 26 Naude SH, Lambrechts NE, Wagner WM. et al. Association of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings with surgical features in Dachshunds with thoracolumbar intervertebral disk extrusion. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 232: 702-708.
• 27 De Risio L, Adams V, Dennis R. et al. Association of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings with outcome in dogs suspected to have ischemic myelopathy: 50 cases (2000-2006). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 233: 129-135.
• 28 Ito D, Matsunaga S, Jeffery ND. et al. Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in dogs with paraplegia caused by thoracolumbar intervertebral disk extrusion: 77 cases (2000-2003). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 227: 1454-1460.
• 29 De Risio L, Adams V, Dennis R. et al. Association of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings with outcome in dogs with presumptive acute noncompressive nucleus pulposus extrusion: 42 cases (2000-2007). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2009; 234: 495-504.
• 30 Ohlerth S, Scharf G. Computed tomography in small animals--basic principles and state of the art applications. Vet J 2007; 173: 254-271.
• 31 King JB, Jones JC, Rossmeisl Jr. JH. et al. Effect of multi-planar CT image reformatting on surgeon diagnostic performance for localizing thoracolumbar disc extrusions in dogs. J Vet Sci 2009; 10: 225-232.
• 32 Davis GJ, Brown DC. Prognostic indicators for time to ambulation after surgical decompression in nonambulatory dogs with acute thoracolumbar disk extrusions: 112 cases. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 513-518.