Primary and concomitant flexor enthesopathy of the canine elbow

Summary

Objectives: To report the characteristics of two types of flexor enthesopathy, primary and concomitant, based on different diagnostic techniques.

Materials and methods: Over a period of three years a prospective study was performed on dogs admitted for the complaint of elbow lameness. Based on the radiographic findings a selection of dogs underwent a complete series of different imaging modalities. With each technique, pathology of the medial epicondyle and the presence of other elbow disorders were recorded. All joints with signs of flexor pathology apparent with at least three techniques were selected. A distinction was made between primary and concomitant flexor enthesopathy based on the absence or presence of other elbow disorders.

Results: Primary flexor enthesopathy was diagnosed in 23 joints and concomitant flexor enthesopathy in 20 joints. In 43% of the joints with primary and in 75% of the joints with concomitant flexor enthesopathy, pathology at the medial epicondyle was demonstrated by all techniques. All joints with concomitant flexor enthesopathy had a diagnosis of medial coronoid disease, osteochondritis dissecans, or both.

Clinical significance: Pathology at the medial epicondyle is a sign of flexor enthesopathy. It may be present as the only sign in a joint with primary flexor enthesopathy or concomitant with other elbow pathology. In both groups flexor lesions can be demonstrated with different imaging techniques. The distinction between the primary and concomitant form is based on the presence or absence of other elbow pathology, mainly medial coronoid disease. Recognizing both types is important for a correct treatment decision.

Keywords

Flexor enthesopathy - primary - concomitant - elbow - dog

• References

• 1 Berzon JL, Quick CB. Fragmented coronoid process: Anatomical, clinical and radiographic considerations with case analyses. J Am An Hosp Assoc 2006; 16: 241-251.
• 2 Boulay JP. Fragmented medial coronoid process of the ulna in the dog. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1998; 28: 51-74.
• 3 Kirberger RM, Fourie SL. Elbow dysplasia in the dog: pathophysiology, diagnosis and control. J S Afr Vet Assoc 1998; 69: 43-54.
• 4 Van Ryssen B, de Bakker E, Beaumlin Y. et al. Primary flexor enthesopathy of the canine elbow: imaging and arthroscopic findings in eight dogs with discrete radiographic changes. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 239-243.
• 5 de Bakker E, Samoy Y, Gielen I. et al. Medial humeral epicondylar lesions in the canine elbow. A review of the literature. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 9-17.
• 6 Piermattei DL, Flo GL, DeCamp CE. Brinker, Piermattei and Flo's Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Elsevier; 2006
• 7 Ljunggren G, Cawley AJ, Archibald J. The elbow dysplasias in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1966; 148: 887-891.
• 8 Culvenor JA, Howlett CR. Avulsion of the medial epicondyle of the humerus in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1982; 23: 83-89.
• 9 Grondalen J, Braut T. Lameness in two young dogs caused by a calcified body in the joint capsule of the elbow. J Small Anim Pract 1976; 17: 681-684.
• 10 Harasen G. The mysterious dysplastic elbow. Can Vet J 2003; 44: 673-674.
• 11 Meyer-Lindberg A, Heinen V, Hewicker-Trautwein M. et al. Vorkommen und Behandlung von knochern Metaplasien in den am medialen Epikondylus des Humerus entspringenden Beugesehnen beim Hund [Occurrence and treatment of bone metaplasia arising from the medial epicondyle of the humerus flexor tendons in the dog]. Tierarztl Prax 2004; 32: 276-285.
• 12 Walker TM. A redefined type of elbow dysplasia in the dog--2 cases. Can Vet J 1998; 39: 573-575.
• 13 Zontine WJ, Weitkamp RA, Lippincott CL. Redefined type of elbow dysplasia involving calcified flexor tendons attached to the medial humeral epicondyle in three dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 194: 1082-1085.
• 14 de Bakker E, Saunders J, Gielen I. et al. Radiographic findings of the medial humeral epicondyle in 200 canine elbow joints. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 359-365.
• 15 Benjamin M, Toumi H, Ralphs JR. et al. Where tendons and ligaments meet bone: attachment sites (‘entheses’) in relation to exercise and/or mechanical load. J Anat 2006; 208: 471-490.
• 16 Zontine WJ, Weitkamp RA, Lippincott CL. Redefined type of elbow dysplasia involving calcified flexor tendons attached to the medial humeral epicondyle in three dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 194: 1082-1085.
• 17 Ciccotti MC, Schwartz MA, Ciccotti MG. Diagnosis and treatment of medial epicondylitis of the elbow. Clin Sports Med 2004; 23: 693-705 xi.
• 18 de Bakker E, Saunders JH, van Bree H. et al. Radiographic features of primary and concomitant flexor enthesopathy in the canine elbow. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2013; 54: 107-113.
• 19 Arkell M, Archer RM, Guitian FJ. et al. Evidence of bias affecting the interpretation of the results of local anaesthetic nerve blocks when assessing lameness in horses. Vet Rec 2006; 159: 346-349.
• 20 Fuller CJ, Bladon BM, Driver AJ. The intra- and inter-assessor reliability of measurement of functional outcome by lameness scoring in horses. Vet J 2006; 171: 281-286.
• 21 Peremans K, Vermeire S, Dobbeleir A. et al. Recognition of anatomical predilection sites in canine elbow pathology on bone scans using micro-single photon emission tomography. Vet J 2011; 188: 64-72.
• 22 De Rycke LM, Gielen IM, Van Bree H. et al. Computed tomography of the elbow joint in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63: 1400-1407.
• 23 Baeumlin Y, De Rycke L, Van Caelenberg A. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the canine elbow: an anatomic study. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 566-573.
• 24 Van Ryssen B, van Bree H, Simoens P. Elbow arthroscopy in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 191-198.
• 25 Hazewinkel HAW. editor. Elbow Dysplasia; definitions and clinical diagnoses. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the International Elbow Working Group. 2008. August 20 Dublin, Ireland:
• 26 May C, Bennett D. Medial epicondylar spur associated with lameness in dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1988; 29: 797-803.
• 27 Samoy Y, Gielen I, Van Bree H. et al. Dysplastic elbow diseases in dogs. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift 2011; 80: 327-338.
• 28 Hazewinkel HAW. editor. The clinical diagnosis of elbow dysplasia. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the International Elbow Working Group. 2002. October 2 Granada, Spain:
• 29 Van Ryssen B, van Bree H. Arthroscopic findings in 100 dogs with elbow lameness. Vet Rec 1997; 140: 360-362.
• 30 Jardel N, Crevier-Denoix N, Moissonnier P. et al. Anatomical and safety considerations in establishing portals used for canine elbow arthroscopy. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 75-80.
• 31 Klein W, Kurze V. Arthroscopic arthropathy: iatrogenic arthroscopic joint lesions in animals. Arthroscopy 1986; 2: 163-168.
• 32 Kijowski R, De Smet AA. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with medial epicondylitis. Skeletal Radiol 2005; 34: 196-202.
• 33 Martin CE, Schweitzer ME. MR imaging of epicondylitis. Skeletal Radiol 1998; 27: 133-138.
• 34 Konar M, Lang J. Pros and cons of low-field magnetic resonance imaging in veterinary practice. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011; 52 (1 Suppl 1) S5-S14.