Effect of stifle angle on the magnitude of the tibial plateau angle measurement in dogs with intact and transected cranial cruciate ligament

Summary

Objective: To determine the effect of stifle angle on the magnitude of the radiographic tibial plateau angle (TPA) in normal and cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) -deficient stifles.

Methods: Three pairs of canine cadaver hind-limbs from three skeletally mature dogs were positioned in a custom-made positioning device. A lateral radiograph of each specimen was obtained before and after transection of the CCL at four stifle angles (90°, 110°, 135° and 140–150° [i.e. maximum extension]), based on goniometric measurements. Four observers determined the radiographic TPA twice for each radiograph with a minimum of two days between each measurement. The radiographic TPA measurements in all specimens at different stifle angles with intact CCL and transected CCL were compared with mixed-model ANOVA. The effect of stifle angle, CCL transection, and interaction between the two on observer TPA measurement variability was also determined using the coefficient of variation.

Results: Tibial plateau angle was not statistically different in the stifle angles for either the intact or transected CCL. There was also no statistical difference for TPA between intact and transected CCL groups at each of the stifle angles. Stifle angle, CCL transection and interaction between the two did not have any significant effect for intra-observer and inter-observer variation.

Clinical significance: The angle of the stifle during radiography does not influence the magnitude of the TPA measurement as determined on true lateral radiographs of the stifle and tibia in cadaveric canine limbs.

Keywords

Cranial cruciate ligament - tibial plateau angle - stifle angle - tibial plateau levelling osteotomy

• References

• 1 Slocum B, Devine T.. Cranial tibial thrust: a primary force in the canine stifle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983; 183: 456-459.
• 2 Slocum B, Slocum TD.. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993; 23: 777-795.
• 3 Vaughan LC.. The history of canine cruciate ligament surgery from 1952–2005. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 379-384.
• 4 Warzee CC, Dejardin LM, Arnoczky SP. et al. Effect of tibial plateau leveling on cranial and caudal tibial thrusts in canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifles: an in vitro experimental study. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 278-286.
• 5 Grierson J, Sanders M, Guitan J. et al. Comparison of anatomical tibial plateau angle versus observer measurement from lateral radiographs in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 215-219.
• 6 Fettig AA, Rand WM, Sato AF. et al. Observer variability of tibial plateau slope measurement in 40 dogs with cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joints. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 471-478.
• 7 Caylor KB, Zumpano CA, Evans LM. et al. Intraand interobserver measurement variability of tibial plateau slope from lateral radiographs in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2001; 37: 263-268.
• 8 Reif U, Dejardin LM, Probst CW. et al. Influence of limb positioning and measurement method on the magnitude of the tibial plateau angle. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 368-375.
• 9 Mattoon JS, Smith C.. Breakthroughs in radiography: Computed radiography. Comp Cont Educ Pract 2004; 26: 58-66.
• 10 Unis MD, Johnson AL, Griffon DJ. et al. Evaluation of intra- and interobserver variability and repeatability of tibial plateau angle measurements with digital radiography using a novel digital radiographic program. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 187-194.
• 11 Reif U, Probst CW.. Comparison of tibial plateau angles in normal and cranial cruciate deficient stifles of Labrador retrievers. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 385-389.
• 12 Dennler R, Kipfer NM, Tepic S. et al. Inclination of the patellar ligament in relation to flexion angle in stifle joints of dogs without degenerative joint disease. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 1849-1854.
• 13 Baroni E, Matthias RR, Marcellin-Little DJ. et al. Comparison of radiographic assessments of the tibial plateau slope in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2003; 64: 586-589.
• 14 Reif U, Hulse DA, Hauptman JG.. Effect of tibial plateau leveling on stability of the canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifle joint: an in vitro study. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 147-154.
• 15 Moeller EM, Cross AR, Rapoff AJ.. Change in tibial plateau angle after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 460-464.
• 16 Wilke VL, Conzemius MG, Besancon MF. et al. Comparison of tibial plateau angle between clinically normal Greyhounds and Labrador Retrievers with and without rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 221: 1426-1429.
• 17 Schnabl E, Reese S, Lorinson K. et al. Measurement of the tibial plateau angle in cats with and without cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 83-86.
• 18 Jaegger G, Marcellin-Little DJ, Levine D.. Reliability of goniometry in Labrador Retrievers. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63: 979-986.
• 19 Morris E, Lipowitz AJ.. Comparison of tibial plateau angles in dogs with and without cranial cruciate ligament injuries. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 218: 363-366.
• 20 Slocum B.. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for cranial cruciate ligament. In Bojrab MJ. editor Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery. 4th ed. Baltimore, MA: Williams and Wilkins; 1998: pg. 1209-1215.
• 21 Shahar R, Milgram J.. Biomechanics of tibial plateau leveling of the canine cruciate-deficient stifle joint: A theoretical model. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 144-1449.
• 22 Bennett D, Tennant B, Lewis DG. et al. A reappraisal of anterior cruciate ligament disease in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1988; 29: 275-297.
• 23 Duerr FM, Duncan CG, Savicky RS. et al. Risk factors for excessive tibial plateau angle in large-breed dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007; 231: 1688-1691.
• 24 Boudrieau RJ.. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or tibial tuberosity advancement?. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 1-22.
• 25 Perry K, Fitzpatrick N.. Tibial tuberosity advancement in two cats with cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 196-202.