Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23(06): 400-405
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-09-08-0088
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Mechanical testing of a modified stabilisation method for tibial tuberosity advancement

S. Etchepareborde
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Belgium
,
N. Barthelemy
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Belgium
,
J. Mills
2   Scarsdale Veterinary Hospital, Derby, UK
,
F. Pascon
3   Department of Architecture, Geology, Environment and Constructions, University of Liège, Belgium
,
G. R. Ragetly
4   Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA
,
M. Balligand
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Belgium
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 16 August 2009

Accepted: 27 April 2010

Publication Date:
19 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: This in vitro study evaluated three modified techniques of tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA). Loads to failure were calculated for each technique.

Methods: A 9 mm TTA procedure was performed in the tibiae of dogs weighing between 32 and 38 kg. In group 1 (n = 12), the distal part of the tibial crest was left attached to the tibia by the cranial cortex, and a figure-of-eight wire was added for stabilisation. In group 2 (n = 12), the tibial crest was left attached but no additional device was used for stabilisation. In group 3 (n = 12), the tibial crest was completely separated from the tibia and fixed by a figure-of-eight wire so that, in this group, only the wire opposed avulsion of the tibial crest. Unidirectional axial force was applied via the patella to determine the maximal load to failure of the model.

Results: There was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2. These two groups both had a significantly stronger construct than that of group 3.

Clinical significance: We described modifications to the TTA procedure without plate fixation that warrant clinical investigation. When the crest is broken during its advancement, the tension sustained by the repair is significantly weaker from a biomechanical point of view and the use of such a repair clinically is not recommended by the authors.

Keywords

Cranial cruciate ligament rupture - dog - mechanical resistance - tibial tuberosity advancement
 

  • References

  • 1 Johnson JA, Austin C, Breur GJ. Incidence of Canine Appendicular Musculoskeletal Disorders in 16 Veterinary Teaching Hospitals from 1980 through 1989. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 7: 56-69.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Innes JF, Barr AR. Clinical natural history of the postsurgical cruciate deficient canine stifle joint: year 1. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 325-332.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jackson J, Vasseur PB, Griffey S. et al. Pathologic changes in grossly normal menisci in dogs with rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 218: 1281-1284.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Aragon CL, Budsberg SC. Applications of evidence-based medicine: cranial cruciate ligament injury repair in the dog. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 93-98.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Slocum B, Devine T. Cranial tibial wedge osteotomy: a technique for eliminating cranial tibial thrust in cranial cruciate ligament repair. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1984; 184: 564-569.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Slocum B, Slocum TD. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993; 23: 777-795.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Tepic S, Damur DM, Montavon PM. Biomechanics of the stifle joint. In: Tepic S, Damur DM, Montavon PM, editors. Proceedings of the 1st World Orthopaedic Veterinary Congress Munich, Germany: 2002. September 5-8 gs. 189-190.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Lafaver S, Miller NA, Stubbs WP. et al. Tibial tube-rosity advancement for stabilization of the canine cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joint: surgical technique, early results, and complications in 101 dogs. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 573-586.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Maquet P. Advancement of the tibial tuberosity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976; 115: 225-230.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mendes DG, Soudry M, Iusim M. Clinical assessment of Maquet tibial tuberosity advancement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; 222: 228-238.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fair J. Tibial tubercle osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64: 766-771.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Herrenbruck TM, Mullen DK, Parker RD. Operative management of patellofemoral pain with degenerative arthrosis. Sports Med Arthroscopy Rev 2001; 9: 312-324.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bruce WJ, Rose A, Tuke J. et al. Evaluation of the triple tibial osteotomy. A new technique for the management of the canine cruciate-deficient stifle. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 159-168.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Abel SB, Hammer DL, Shott S. Use of the proximal portion of the tibia for measurement of the tibial plateau angle in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2003; 64: 1117-1123.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Advancement of the tibial tuberosity for the treatment of cranial cruciate deficient canine stifle. In: Montavon PM, Damur DM, Tepic S, editors. Proceedings of the 1st World Orthopaedic Veterinary Congress Munich, Germany: 2002. September 5-8 g. 152.
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Hoffmann DE, Miller JM, Ober CP. et al. Tibial tuberosity advancement in 65 canine stifles. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006; 19: 219-227.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Moles AS, Hill TP, Glyde M. Triple tibial osteotomy for treatment of the canine cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joint. Surgical findings and postoperative complications in 97 stifles. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 222: 473-478.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Incavo S, Difazio F, Wilder D. et al. Longitudinal crack propagation in bone around femoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; 272: 175-180.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Black J. Practical aspects of material deformation. In: Orthopaedic Biomaterials in Research and Practice. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1988: g. 48.
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Roe S. Evaluation of tension obtained by use of three knots for tying cerclage wires by surgeons of various abilities and experience. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 220: 334-336.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Roe SC. Mechanical characteristics and comparisons of cerclage wires: introduction of the double-wrap and loop/twist tying methods. Vet Surg 1997; 26: 310-316.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hak DJ, Golladay GJ. Olecranon fractures: treatment options. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000; 08: 266-275.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Guadagni JR, Drummond DS. Strength of surgical wire fixation. A laboratory study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 209: 176-181.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Voss K, Imhof J, Kaestner S. et al. Force plate gait analysis at the walk and trot in dogs with low-grade hindlimb lameness. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 2: 299-304.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Conzemius MG, Evans RB, Besancon M. et al. Effect of surgical technique on limb function after surgery for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 226: 232-236.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Wilson JW, Belloli DM, Robbins T. Resistance of cerclage to knot failure. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985; 187: 389-391.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Shahar R, Banks-Sills L. Biomechanical analysis of the canine hind limb: calculation of forces during three-legged stance. Vet J 2002; 163: 240-250.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Goh JC, Ang EJ, Bose K. Effect of preservation medium on the mechanical properties of cat bones. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60: 465-467.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Linde F, Sorensen HC. The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 1993; 26: 1249-1252.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar