Semantic Interoperability Adheres to Proper Models and Code Systems

Summary

Objectives: Achieving semantic interoperability requires not only the use of communication standards like HL7 with its underlying models and specifications, but also to constrain those models to instances including permitted attributes, data types, values and code systems. Even the application of both strategies may lead to different modeling approaches and therefore incompatible results, however.

Methods: This paper analyzes the different ways to create a model exemplified at score and assessment systems.

Results: The different approaches have advantages and disadvantages. The presented results allow for transmitting the same basic information facilitating HL7 v2.x and V3 in a way reducing implementation efforts.

Conclusions: Establishing a generic approach to communicate the details of score systems driven by an appropriate set of codes is the best solution for implementers.

Keywords

Health telematics - communication standard - HL7 - semantic interoperability - conformance - implementation guides - scores and assessments

• References

• 1 Health Level Seven, Inc.. http://www.hl7.org.
• 2 Hinchley A. Understanding Version 3 – A primer on the HL7 Version 3 Communication Standard. Köln: Verlag Alexander Mönch; 2003
• 3 Oemig F, Blobel B. HL7 Conformance: How to do proper messaging?. In: Bos L, Blobel B. (eds). Medical and Care Compunetics 4. pp 298-307. Series “Studies in Health Technology and Informatics”, Vol. 127. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press; 2007. http://www.icmcc2007.net.
• 4 German Message Profiles for HL7 v2.5. http://www.hl7.de.
• 5 VhitG-Arztbrief.. http://www.vhitg.de.
• 6 NICTIZ, Nationaal ICT Instituut in de Zrg.. http://www.nictiz.nl.
• 7 Website with information about HL7 V3 care provision. http://www.zorginformatiemodel.nl.
• 8 Oemig F, Blobel B. Does HL7 Go towards an Architecture Standard?. In: Engelbrecht R, Geissbuhler A, Lovis Ch, Mihalas G. (eds). Connecting Medical Informatics and Bio-Informatics. Proceedings of MIE 2005, pp 761-766. Series “Studies in Health Technology and Informatics”, Vol. 116. Amsterdam, Berlin, Oxford, Tokyo, Washington DC: IOS Press; 2005.
• 9 SNOMED: Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine.. http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct.
• 10 LOINC: Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes.. http://www.loinc.org.
• 11 Score System Implementation Guide, 13th draft. http://www.hl7.org.
• 12 Regenstrief Institute.. http://www.regenstrief.org.
• 13 DICOM.. http://www.rsna.org.
• 14 IHE PCC (Patient Care Coordination) Technical Framework, Version 3.0. http://www.ihe.net Technical_Framework/index.cfm#pcc.
• 15 Schematron: A language for making assertions about patterns found in XML documents. www.schematron.com.
• 16 Protégé: The Protégé Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System.. http://protege.stanford. edu
• 17 ICD: International Classification of Diseases.. http://www.who.org or http://www.dimdi.de.
• 18 [18] DCM: Detailed Clinical Information Models. http://detailedclinicalmodels.org.