Journal of Pediatric Neurology 2011; 09(02): 209-214
DOI: 10.3233/JPN-2011-0459
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart – New York

Developmental age and motor function levels in children with cerebral palsy

Asuman Dogan
a   Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital, Sıhhiye, Ankara, Turkey
,
Adem Yıldırım
b   Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Adiyaman State Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey
,
Ilkay Karabay
a   Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital, Sıhhiye, Ankara, Turkey
,
Gulseren Dost
a   Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital, Sıhhiye, Ankara, Turkey
,
Nese a Ozgirgin
a   Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital, Sıhhiye, Ankara, Turkey
› Author Affiliations

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

06 April 2010

22 June 2010

Publication Date:
30 July 2015 (online)

Abstract

We determined the developmental level of 107 children (mean age, 66.41 ± 32.92 mo) with cerebral palsy in an inpatient rehabilitation program and assessed both the difference between calendar age and developmental age and the effect of developmental level on motor function improvement. The Denver II test was used to reveal the difference between calendar age and developmental age, and we determined whether there was a statistically significant difference between the admission and discharge motor function measurements of the subjects. The effect of the Denver II developmental levels of language, fine-motor, personal-social, and gross-motor skills on motor function was investigated. We found a statistically significant difference between the developmental levels and calendar ages of the study subjects. Denver II test results revealed a statistically significant difference between the personal-social, gross-motor, and fine-motor levels of the subjects. We found no difference only between personal-social and language levels. Gross-motor development was the most delayed value by calendar age. Regardless of developmental level, there was a statistically significant difference between motor activity levels at admission and discharge as revealed by the Gross-motor Functional Classification System and the Gross-motor Function Measure. The developmental ages of the subjects were much lower than their calendar ages. We concluded that the Denver II language and fine-motor developmental level did not have an effect on functional gains but that the subjects with good personal-social and gross-motor function developmental levels exhibited relatively better motor function gains at the time of discharge.