Story reading with incidental comprehension and memory: left hemisphere dominance

ABSTRACT

Background: There are no studies on adults with unilateral brain lesions regarding story reading with incidental/implicit comprehension and memory, in which memory is only assessed through delayed recall. There is a need for validation of cerebral laterality in this type of verbal recall, which includes spontaneous performance (free or uncued condition (UC)), and induced-through-question performance regarding the forgotten units (cued condition (CC)). Objectives: To explore the effects of unilateral brain lesions, of oral reading with expression (RE) and comprehension (RC) on delayed recall of a story, as either UC or CC; and to validate the ability of UC and CC to discriminate the side of brain injury. Methods: Data were obtained from 200 right-handed volunteers, among whom 42 had left-hemisphere injury (LHI), 49 had right-hemisphere injury (RHI) and 109 were demographically-matched healthy participants (HP). Patients who were unable to read, understand or speak were excluded. Results: LHI individuals presented impairment of both UC and CC, in relation to the other two groups (non-LHI) with sensitivity and specificity above 70%. LHI and RHI individuals were not significantly different in RE and RC, but they were both different from HP in all the assessments except CC, in which RHI individuals resembled HP. Despite this lack of abnormality in RHI individuals during CC, about half of this group showed impairment in UC. Additionally, whereas RE had a significant effect on UC, the moral of the story (RC) had a significant effect on both UC and CC. Conclusions: The left hemisphere was dominant for this memory task involving implicit processing.

RESUMEN

Antecedentes: No existen estudios en adultos con lesiones cerebrales unilaterales sobre la lectura de una historia, con comprensión y memoria incidental/implícita, midiendo sólo el recuerdo diferido. Se necesita validar la lateralidad cerebral en este tipo de recuerdo verbal que incluye: desempeño espontáneo (condición sin claves (CS) o libre) y desempeño inducido con preguntas sobre las unidades olvidadas (condición con claves (CC)). Objetivos: Explorar el efecto de las lesiones cerebrales unilaterales, la lectura expresiva (LE) y la comprensiva (LC), sobre el recuerdo diferido de una historia, sea CS o CC. Validar CS y CC en su capacidad para discriminar el lado de la lesión cerebral. Métodos: Los datos se obtuvieron de 200 voluntarios diestros, 42 con lesiones del hemisferio izquierdo (LHI), 49 con lesiones del hemisferio derecho (LHD), y 109 participantes sanos (PS), equiparados demográficamente. Se excluyeron los pacientes que no pudieron leer, entender o hablar. Resultados: LHI resultó perjudicado respecto de los otros dos grupos (no-LHI) en CS y CC, con una sensibilidad y especificidad superior al 70%. LHI y LHD no se diferenciaron significativamente en LE ni LC, pero ambos fueron diferentes de los PS en todas las evaluaciones excepto CC, en donde LHD se asemejó a los PS. A pesar de esta ausencia de anomalía en LHD durante CC, aproximadamente la mitad de LHD mostró deterioro en CS. Además, mientras que LE tuvo un efecto significativo en CS, la moraleja de la historia (LC) tuvo un efecto significativo tanto en CS como en CC. Conclusiones: El hemisferio izquierdo fue dominante para esta tarea de memoria que involucró procesamiento implícito.

Keywords:

Cognitive Dysfunction - Diagnosis - Narration - Neuropsychological Tests - Validation Study

Palabras clave:

Disfunción Cognitiva - Diagnóstico - Narración - Pruebas Neuropsicológicas - Estudio de Validación

• References

• 1 Kintsch W, Patel VL, Ericsson KA. The role of long-term working memory in text comprehension. Psychologia. 1999 Dec;42(4):186-98.
• 2 Kawakami N, Yoshida F. Perceiving a story outside of conscious awareness: when we infer narrative attributes from subliminal sequential stimuli. Conscious Cogn. 2015 May;33:53-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.001
• 3 Ferstl EC, Walther K, Guthke T, von Cramon DY. Assessment of story comprehension deficits after brain damage. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005 Apr;27(3):367-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390490515784
• 4 Yarkoni T, Speer NK, Zacks JM. Neural substrates of narrative comprehension and memory. Neuroimage. 2008 Jul 15;41(4):1408-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.062
• 5 Xu J, Kemeny S, Park G, Frattali C, Braun A. Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension. NeuroImage. 2005 Apr 15;25(3):1002-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.013
• 6 Formisano R, Schmidhuber-Eiler B, Saltuari L, Cigany E, Birbamer G, Gerstenbrand F. Neuropsychological outcome after traumatic temporal lobe damage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991 Mar;109(1-2): 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405688
• 7 Djordjevic J, Smith ML, Sziklas V, Piper D, Pénicaud S, Jones-Gotman M. The Story Learning and Memory (SLAM) test: equivalence of three forms and sensitivity to left temporal lobe dysfunction. Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Mar 1;20(3):P518-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.01.002
• 8 Fuentes D, Malloy-Diniz LF, Gorenstein C, Christe B, Busatto GF. Learning and memory and its relationship with the lateralization of epileptic focus in subjects with temporal lobe epilepsy. Rev Psiquiatr Clín. 2014 Apr;41(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-60830000041114
• 9 Machado V de V, Frank JE, Tomaz C. Emotional declarative memory assessment of patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and patients submitted to mesial temporal lobectomy. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2010 Oct;68(5):737-43. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2010000500012
• 10 Moore PM, Baker GA. Validation of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised in asample of people with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1996 Dec;37(12):1215-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00556.x
• 11 Soble JR, Eichstaedt KE, Waseem H, Mattingly ML, Benbadis SR, Bozorg AM, et al. Clinical utility of the Wechsler Memory Scale--Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) in predicting laterality of temporal lobe epilepsy among surgical candidates. Epilepsy Behav . 2014 Dec 1;41:P232-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.10.014
• 12 Vannest J, Szaflarski JP, Privitera MD, Schefft BK, Holland SK. Medial temporal fMRI activation reflects memory lateralization and memory performance in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav . 2008 Apr 1;12(3):P410-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.11.012
• 13 Buchweitz A, Mason RA, Tomitch LMB, Just MA. Brain activation for reading and listening comprehension: an fMRI study of modality effects and individual differences in language comprehension. Psychol Neurosci. 2009;2(2):111-23. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2009.2.003
• 14 Chow HM, Kaup B, Raabe M, Greenlee MW. Evidence of fronto-temporal interactions for strategic inference processes during language comprehension. Neuroimage . 2008 Apr 1;40(2):940-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.044
• 15 Fedorenko E, Behr MK, Kanwisher N. Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 27;108(39):16428-33. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112937108
• 16 Hasson U, Nusbaum HC, Small SL. Brain networks subserving the extraction of sentence information and its encoding to memory. Cereb Cortex. 2007 Dec;17(12):2899-913. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm016
• 17 Nichelli P, Grafman J, Pietrini P, Clark K, Lee KY, Miletich R. Where the brain appreciates the moral of a story. Neuroreport. 1995 Nov 27;6(17):2309-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199511270-00010
• 18 Powers C, Bencic R, Horton WS, Beeman M. Hemispheric inference priming during comprehension of conversations and narratives. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Sep;50(11):2577-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.008
• 19 Rapp AM, Mutschler DE, Erb M. Where in the brain is nonliteral language? A coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Neuroimage . 2012 Oct 15;63(1):600-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.022
• 20 Rice DM, Buchsbaum MS, Hardy D, Burgwald L. Focal left temporal slow EEG activity is related to a verbal recent memory deficit in a non-demented elderly population. J Gerontol. 1991 Jul;46(4):P144-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/46.4.P144
• 21 Spitsyna G, Warren JE, Scott SK, Turkheimer FE, Wise RJS. Converging language streams in the human temporal lobe. J Neurosci. 2006 Jul 12;26(28):7328-36. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0559-06.2006
• 22 Trifilio E, Tanner JJ, Butterfield L, Mangal P, Maye JE, Marsiske M, et al. A tale of two stories: validity of an alternative story memory test in a sample of older adults. Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Jan;34(1):158-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1538428
• 23 Vigneau M, Beaucousin V, Hervé P-Y, Jobard G, Petit L, Crivello F, et al. What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing? Insights from a meta-analysis. Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):577-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.036
• 24 Dutta A, Shah K, Silvanto J, Soto D. Neural basis of non-conscious visual working memory. Neuroimage . 2014 May 1;91:336-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.016
• 25 Henke K. A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Jul;11(7):523-32. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2850
• 26 Jeffries E, Ralph MAL, Baddeley AD. Automatic and controlled processing in sentence recall: the role of long-term and working memory. J Memory Lang. 2004 Nov;51(4):623-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.005
• 27 Velichkovsky BB. Consciousness and working memory: current trends and research perspectives. Conscious Cogn. 2017 Oct;55:35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.07.005
• 28 Vigliecca NS. Neurocognitive implications of tangential speech in patients with focal brain damage. In: D’Onofrio G, Sancarlo D, Greco A, editors. Gerontology. London: InTechOpen; 2018. p. 191-220.
• 29 Vigliecca NS. Neuropsychological tests abbreviated and adapted to Spanish speakers: review of previous findings and validity studies for the discrimination of patients with anterior vs. posterior lesions. Rev Neurol. 2004 Aug 1-15;39(3):205-12.
• 30 Corella LG, Busquets C. El Huerfanito Cojo. In: Busquets C, Corella LJ. 55 cuentos y fábulas. Madrid: Susaeta Ediciones S.A.; 1978. p. 42-4.
• 31 Vigliecca NS, Voos JA. Remembering a name: neuropsychological validity studies and a computer proposal for detection of anomia. Dement Neuropsychol. 2019 Oct-Dec;13(4):450-62. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642018dn13-040013
• 32 Vigliecca NS. Validity and features of spontaneous speech in acute aphasia as evaluated with the Brief Aphasia Evaluation: is fluent aphasia more severe than nonfluent aphasia? Codas. 2019 Mar 7;31(1):e20180048. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20192018048
• 33 World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
• 34 Kocaarslan M. The effects of reading rate, accuracy and prosody on second grade students' oral retelling. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jun;197:86-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.005
• 35 Trejo S. Lateralidad: cuestionario para la medición de la preferencia manual ENT#091;Bachelor's thesisENT#093;. ENT#091;Santiago del EsteroENT#093;: Universidad Católica de Santiago del Estero; 1993.
• 36 StatSoft, Inc, Manual. STATISTICA: Data analysis software system. Version 7. Tulsa (OK): StatSoft; 2004.
• 37 Frank JE, Tomaz C. Lateralized impairment of the emotional enhancement of verbal memory in patients with amygdala-hippocampus lesion. Brain Cogn. 2003 Jul;52(2):223-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00075-7
• 38 Múnera CP, Lomlomdjian C, Terpiluk V, Medel N, Solís P, Kochen S. Memory for emotional material in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Nov 1;52(Pt A):P57-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.08.009
• 39 Bolognani SAP, Miranda MC, Martins M, Rzezak P, Bueno OFA, de Camargo CHP, et al. Development of alternative versions of the Logical Memory subtest of the WMS-R for use in Brazil. Dement Neuropsychol. 2015 Apr-Jun;9(2):136-48. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642015DN92000008
• 40 Cannizzaro MS, Dumas J, Prelock P, Newhouse P. Organizational structure reduces processing load in the prefrontal cortex during discourse processing of written text: implications for high-level reading issues after TBI. Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord. 2012 Aug 1;22(2):67-78. https://doi.org/10.1044/nnsld22.2.67