CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2021; 79(03): 238-247
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0153
VIEW AND REVIEW

Evaluating subjective cognitive decline: a systematic review of tools available for evaluating cognitive complaints in Portuguese

Avaliação de declínio cognitivo subjetivo: uma revisão sistemática de instrumentos disponíveis para avaliar queixa cognitiva em português
1   Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Medicina, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
2   Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
3   Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gerontologia Biomédica, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
,
1   Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Medicina, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
,
2   Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
,
1   Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Medicina, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
2   Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
3   Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gerontologia Biomédica, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
,
1   Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Medicina, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
2   Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
› Institutsangaben

ABSTRACT

Background: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is a perception that is not objectively measured in screening tests. Although many tools are available for evaluating SCD, no single gold standard is available for classifying individuals as presenting SCD, in the Portuguese-speaking population. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature for tools used to evaluate SCD in the Portuguese-speaking population. Methods: Four databases (Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS and MEDLINE) were primarily utilized in this study (Phase 1). Subsequently, we conducted a manual search of the literature (Phase 2). We then retrieved tools for critical evaluation (Phase 3). Studies that matched the inclusion criteria were analyzed. We summarized the features of each tool in terms of the number of questions, scoring system, benefits and deficiencies, translation and validity. Results: A total of 30 studies utilizing four questionnaires and seven different single questions were found. The tools retrieved were the Memory Assessment Questionnaire (MAC-Q; 12/30 studies), single-question methods (7/30 studies), Subjective Memory Complaint Scale (SMC scale; 5/30 studies), Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ; 3/30 studies) and Memory Complaint Scale (MCS; 3/30 studies). Only two were formally translated and validated for the Portuguese speaking population (PRMQ and MCS). Conclusions: In summary, SCD is still underinvestigated in Portuguese-speaking countries. The MAC-Q was the most commonly used tool in Portuguese, despite its lack of formal translation and validation for the Portuguese-speaking population. Further studies are required in order to develop and validate a screening tool that includes questions for detecting SCD-plus features and affective symptoms, so as to improve its predictive value.

RESUMO

Introdução: Declínio cognitivo subjetivo (DCS) é uma percepção não objetivamente mensurada em testes de rastreio. Apesar de muitos instrumentos estarem disponíveis para avaliação de DCS, nenhum padrão-ouro único é capaz de classificar um indivíduo com DCS em população falante de português. Este estudo objetivou revisar sistematicamente a literatura para instrumentos usados, para avaliar DCS em falantes de português. Métodos: Quatro bases de dados (Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS e MEDLINE) foram inicialmente usadas neste estudo (Fase 1). Em seguida, conduzimos uma busca manual (Fase 2) e os instrumentos coletados foram criticamente avaliados (Fase 3). Estudos que correspondiam aos critérios de inclusão foram analisados. Nós resumimos as características de cada instrumento em termos de números de questões, sistema de pontuação, vantagens e desvantagens, tradução e validação. Resultados: O total de 30 estudos utilizou 4, questionários e 7 diferentes questões para avaliar DCS. Os instrumentos avaliados foram Memory Assessment Questionnaire (MAC-Q, 12/30 estudos), método de questão única (7/30 estudos), Subjective Memory Complaint Scale (SMC-scale, 5/30 estudos), Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ, 3/30 estudos) e Memory Complaint Scale (MCS, 3/30 estudos). Apenas dois instrumentos foram formalmente traduzidos e validados para falantes de português (PRMQ e MCS). Conclusões: Em suma, DCS é ainda sub-representado em países lusofônicos. O MAC-Q foi o instrumento mais utilizado em português, apesar de sua falta de tradução e validação formal para a população falante de português. Mais estudos são necessários para desenvolver e validar um instrumento de rastreio que inclua questões sobre DCS-plus e sintomas afetivos, para aumentar seu poder preditivo.

Authors’ contributions:

All authors contributed to writing and revising the final version of the manuscript. WVB designed, wrote and analyzed the results. VNL performed the search and wrote and revised the final version. ELC performed the search and wrote and analyzed the results. MWP and JCC supervised and revised the manuscript.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 21. April 2020

Angenommen: 20. Juli 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
07. Juni 2023

© 2021. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Jessen F, Amariglio RE, van Boxtel M, Breteler M, Ceccaldi M, Chételat G, et al. A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2014 Nov;10(6):844-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2014.01.001
  • 2 Hill NL, Mogle J, Wion R, Munoz E, DePasquale N, Yevchak AM, et al. Subjective cognitive impairment and affective symptoms: a systematic review. Gerontologist. 2016 Dec;56(6):e109-e127. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw091
  • 3 Jessen F, Amariglio RE, Buckley RF, van der Flier WM, Han Y, Molinuevo JL, et al. The characterisation of subjective cognitive decline. Lancet Neurol. 2020 Mar;19(3):271-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30368-0
  • 4 Reisberg B, Shulman MB, Torossian C, Leng L, Zhu W. Outcome over seven years of healthy adults with and without subjective cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement. 2010 Jan;6(1):11-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2009.10.002
  • 5 Busse A, Bischkopf J, Riedel-Heller SG, Angermeyer MC. Mild cognitive impairment: prevalence and incidence according to different diagnostic criteria. Br J Psychiatry. 2003 May;182(5):449-54. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.182.5.449
  • 6 Yun RJ, Lachman ME. Perceptions of aging in two cultures: Korean and American views on old age. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2007 Mar-Jun;21(1-2):55-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-006-9018-y
  • 7 Lange JW. Methodological concerns for non-Hispanic investigators conducting research with Hispanic Americans. Res Nurs Health. 2002 Oct;25(5):411-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.10049
  • 8 Gifford KA, Liu D, Romano RR, Jones RN, Jefferson AL. Development of a subjective cognitive decline questionnaire using item response theory: a pilot study. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015 Dec;1(4):429-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2015.09.004
  • 9 Flaskerud JH. Is the Likert scale format culturally biased? Nurs Res. 1988 May-Jun;37(3):185-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198805000-00013
  • 10 Rabin LA, Smart CM, Crane PK, Amariglio RE, Berman LM, Boada M, et al. Subjective cognitive decline in older adults: an overview of self-report measures used across 19 international research studies. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015 Sep;48 Suppl 1(0 1):S63-86. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-150154
  • 11 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  • 12 Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008 Feb;22(2):338-42. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
  • 13 Rizzi L, Maria Portal M, Batista CEA, Missiaggia L, Roriz-Cruz M. CSF Aβ1-42, but not p-Tau181, differentiates aMCI from SCI. Brain Res. 2018 Jan;1678:27-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2017.10.008
  • 14 Silva D, Guerreiro M, Faria C, Maroco J, Schmand BA, Mendonça A. Significance of subjective memory complaints in the clinical setting. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2014 Dec;27(4):259-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891988714532018
  • 15 Jorm AF. A short form of the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): development and cross-validation. Psychol Med. 1994 Feb;24(1):145-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329170002691X
  • 16 McNair M, Kahn R. Self-assessment of cognitive deficits. In: Crook T, Ferris S, Bartus R, editors. Assessment in Geriatric Psychopharmacology. New Canaan: Powey; 1983. p.137-44.
  • 17 Spreen O, Strauss E. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms and Commentary. 2. ed. London: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  • 18 Piauilino DC, Bueno OFA, Tufik S, Bittencourt LR, Santos-Silva R, Hachul H, et al. The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire: a population-based random sampling study. Memory. 2010 May;18(4):413-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211003742672
  • 19 Benites D, Gomes WB. Tradução, adaptação e validação preliminar do Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ). Psico-USF. 2007 Jan-Jun;12(1):45-54. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712007000100006
  • 20 Bernardes FR, Machado CK, Souza MC, Machado MJ, Belaunde AMA. Queixa subjetiva de memória e a relação com a fluência verbal em idosos ativos. CoDAS. 2017 May;29(3):e20160109. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20172016109
  • 21 Mattos P, Lino V, Rizo L, Alfano Â, Araújo C, Raggio R. Memory complaints and test performance in healthy elderly persons. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr. 2003 Dec;61(4):920-24. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2003000600006
  • 22 Gil G, Busse AL, Shoji FT, Martinelli PD, Mercadante EF. Efeitos de um programa de estimulação cognitiva multidisciplinar intergeracional. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol. 2015 Jul-Set;18(3):533-43. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-9823.2015.14165
  • 23 Jacinto A, Brucki S, Porto C, Martins M, Nitrini R. Subjective memory complaints in the elderly: a sign of cognitive impairment? Clinics. 2014 Mar;69(3):194-7. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2014(03)09
  • 24 Lima-Silva TB, Yassuda MS. The relationship between memory complaints and age in normal aging. Dement Neuropsychol. 2009 Apr-Jun;3(2):94-100. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642009DN30200005
  • 25 Crook TH, Feher EP, Larrabee GJ. Assessment of memory complaint in age-associated memory impairment: The MAC-Q. Int Psychogeriatrics. 1992 Fall;4(2):165-76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610292000991
  • 26 Schmand B, Jonker C, Hooijer C, Lindeboom J. Subjective memory complaints may announce dementia. Neurology. 1996 Jan;46(1):121-5. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.46.1.121
  • 27 Andrade NB, Novelli MM. Perfil Cognitivo e Funcional de Idosos Frequentadores dos Centros de Convivência para idosos da Cidade de Santos, SP. Cad Ter Ocup da UFSCar. 2015 Mar;23(1):143-52. https://doi.org/10.4322/0104-4931.ctoAO396
  • 28 Argimon IL, Irigaray TQ, Stein LM. Cognitive development across different age ranges in late adulthood. Univ Psychol. 2014 Jan-Mar;13(1):253-64. https://doi.org/10.11144/2338
  • 29 Brum PS, Yassuda MS, Forlenza OV. Subjective memory and strategy use in mild cognitive impairment and healthy aging. Psychol Neurosci. 2013 Jan-Jun;6(1):89-94. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2013.1.13
  • 30 Santos AT, Leyendecker DD, Costa ALS, Souza-Talarico JN. Queixa subjetiva de comprometimento da memória em idosos saudáveis: influência de sintomas depressivos, percepção de estresse e autoestima. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2012 Oct;46(n.spe):24-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342012000700004
  • 31 Paulo DLV, Yassuda MS. Queixas de memória de idosos e sua relação com escolaridade, desempenho cognitivo e sintomas de depressão e ansiedade. Arch Clin Psychiatry (São Paulo). 2010 Jan;37(1):23-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832010000100005
  • 32 Lindôso ZCL. Associação entre percepção subjetiva de memória e habilidade manual de idosos participantes de uma oficina de inclusão digital [dissertation]. Porto Alegre: PUCRS; 2008.
  • 33 Caramelli P, Beato RG. Subjective memory complaints and cognitive performance in a sample of healthy elderly. Dement Neuropsychol. 2008 Jan-Mar;2(1):42-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642009DN20100009
  • 34 Minett TSC, Da Silva RV, Ortiz KZ, Bertolucci PHF. Subjective memory complaints in an elderly sample: a cross-sectional study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;23(1):49-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.1836
  • 35 Argimon IIL, Stein LM. Habilidades cognitivas em indivíduos muito idosos: um estudo longitudinal. Cad Saude Publica. 2005 Jan-Fev;21(1):64-72. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2005000100008
  • 36 Sousa M, Pereira A, Costa R, Rami L. Initial phase of adaptation of Memory Alteration Test (M@T) in a Portuguese sample. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 Jul-Aug;61(1):103-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2015.03.008
  • 37 Kasai JYT, Busse AL, Magaldi RM, Soci MA, Rosa PM, Curiati JAE, et al. Effects of Tai Chi Chuan on cognition of elderly women with mild cognitive impairment. Einstein (São Paulo). 2010 Jan-Mar;8(1):40-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082010ao1470
  • 38 Pereira DR, Albuquerque PB. Subjective memory complaints in portuguese young adults: contributions from the adaptation of the prospective and retrospective memory questionnaire. Psychol Belg. 2018 Apr;58(1):91-104. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.387
  • 39 Smith G, Del Sala S, Logie RH, Maylor EA. Prospective and retrospective memory in normal ageing and dementia: a questionnaire study. Memory. 2000 Sep;8(5):311-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210050117735
  • 40 Vale FAC, Balieiro-Jr AP, Silva-Filho JH. Memory complaint scale (MCS) proposed tool for active systematic search. Dement Neuropsychol. 2012 Oct-Dec;6(4):212-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642012DN06040004
  • 41 Sousa M, Pereira A, Costa R. Subjective memory complaints: depressive and anxiety symptoms or cognitive impairment? Psicol Saúde Doença. 2017 Nov;18(3):739-46. https://doi.org/10.15309/17psd180309
  • 42 Ginó S, Mendes T, Maroco J, Ribeiro F, Schmand BA, Mendonça A, et al. Memory complaints are frequent but qualitatively different in young and elderly healthy people. Gerontology. 2010 Apr;56(3):272-7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000240048
  • 43 Almeida ML de, Dalpubel D, Ribeiro EB, Oliveira ESB de, Ansai JH, Vale FAC. Subjective cognitive impairment, cognitive disorders and self-perceived health: The importance of the informant. Dement Neuropsychol. 2019;13(3):335-42. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642018dn13-030011
  • 44 Dalpubel D, Rossi PG, Almeida ML, Ribeiro ES, Araújo R, Andrade LP, et al. Subjective memory complaint and its relationship with cognitive changes and physical vulnerability of community-dwelling older adults. Dement Neuropsychol. 2019 Jul-Sep;13(3):343-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642018dn13-030012
  • 45 Nicholas CR, Dowling NM, Racine AM, Clark LR, Berman SE, Koscik RL, et al. Longitudinal assessment of self- and informant-subjective cognitive complaints in a sample of healthy late-middle aged adults enriched with a family history of Alzheimer’s disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Jul;23(8):617-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617717000509
  • 46 Bourscheid FR, Mothes L, Irigaray TQ. Memória em idoso: relação entre percepção subjetiva e desempenho em testes objetivos. Estud Psicol. 2016 Jan-Mar;33(1):151-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-027520160001000015
  • 47 Aguiar ACPO, Ribeiro MI, Jacinto AF. Subjective memory complaints in the elderly may be related to factors other than cognitive deficit. Dement Neuropsychol. 2010 Jan-Mar;4(1):54-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642010DN40100009
  • 48 Brucki SMD, Nitrini R. Subjective memory impairment in a rural population with low education in the Amazon rainforest: an exploratory study. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009 Nov;21(01):164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610208008065
  • 49 Almeida OP. Queixa de problemas com a memória e o diagnóstico de demência. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr. 1998 Sep;56(3A):412-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X1998000300010
  • 50 Bernal H, Wooley S, Schensul JJ. The challenge of using Likert-type scales with low-literate ethnic populations. Nurs Res. 1997 May-Jun;46(3):179-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199705000-00009
  • 51 Herrera Jr E, Caramelli P, Silveira ASB, Nitrini R. Epidemiologic survey of dementia in a community-dwelling Brazilian population. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2002 Apr-Jun;16(2):103-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.WAD.0000020202.50697
  • 52 Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, Brodaty H, Fratiglioni L, Ganguli M, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet. 2005 Dec;366(9503):2112-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67889-0
  • 53 Santana I, Farinha F, Freitas S, Rodrigues V, Carvalho Á. Epidemiologia da demência e da doença de Alzheimer em Portugal: Estimativas da prevalência e dos encargos financeiros com a medicação. Acta Med Port. 2015 Mar-Apr;28(2):182-8. https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.6025
  • 54 Martins SP, Damasceno BP. Prospective and retrospective memory in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr. 2008 Jun;66(2b):318-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2008000300006
  • 55 Tsang S, Royse C, Terkawi A. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 May;11(5):80-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17
  • 56 Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess. 2003;80(1):99-103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18
  • 57 Wanner M, Probst-Hensch N, Kriemler S, Meier F, Bauman A, Martin BW. What physical activity surveillance needs: validity of a single-item questionnaire. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;48(21):1570-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-092122
  • 58 Cook A, Roberts K, O’Leary F, Allman-Farinelli MA. Comparison of single questions and brief questionnaire with longer validated food frequency questionnaire to assess adequate fruit and vegetable intake. Nutrition. 2015 Jul-Aug;31(7-8):941-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2015.01.006
  • 59 Leung SO, Xu ML. Single-Item measures for subjective academic performance, self-esteem, and socioeconomic status. J Soc Serv Res. 2013 Jun;39(4):511-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2013.794757
  • 60 Malhotra NK, Mukhopadhyay S, Liu X, Dash S. One, few or many?: an integrated framework for identifying the items in measurement scales. Int J Mark Res. 2012 Nov;54(6):835-62. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-54-6-835-862
  • 61 Amariglio RE, Becker JA, Carmasin J, Wadsworth LP, Lorius N, Sullivan C, et al. Subjective cognitive complaints and amyloid burden in cognitively normal older individuals. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Oct;50(12):2880-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.011
  • 62 Jessen F, Feyen L, Freymann K, Tepest R, Maier W, Heun R, et al. Volume reduction of the entorhinal cortex in subjective memory impairment. Neurobiol Aging. 2006 Dec;27(12):1751-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.10.010
  • 63 McWhirter L, Ritchie C, Stone J, Carson A. Functional cognitive disorders: a systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;7(2):191-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30405-5
  • 64 Tsoi KKF, Chan JYC, Hirai HW, Wong SYS. Comparison of diagnostic performance of Two-Question Screen and 15 depression screening instruments for older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;210(4):255-60. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.116.186932
  • 65 Hughes AJ, Dunn KM, Chaffee T, Bhattarai J (Jackie), Beier M. Diagnostic and clinical utility of the GAD-2 for screening anxiety symptoms in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Oct;99(10):2045-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.029