Thromb Haemost 2016; 115(02): 399-405
DOI: 10.1160/th15-02-0172
Stroke, Systemic or Venous Thromboembolism
Schattauer GmbH

Time trends and case fatality rate of in-hospital treated pulmonary embolism during 11 years of observation in Northwestern Italy

Francesco Dentali
1   Department of Clinical Medicine, Insubria University, Varese, Italy
,
Walter Ageno
1   Department of Clinical Medicine, Insubria University, Varese, Italy
,
Fulvio Pomero
2   Internal Medicine Department, S. Croce e Carle General Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
,
Luigi Fenoglio
2   Internal Medicine Department, S. Croce e Carle General Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
,
Alessandro Squizzato
1   Department of Clinical Medicine, Insubria University, Varese, Italy
,
Matteo Bonzini
3   Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Research Centre, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 27 February 2015

Accepted after major revision: 13 August 2015

Publication Date:
22 November 2017 (online)

Summary

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disorder with high mortality and morbidity rates. However, population-based information on its incidence and prognosis remains limited. We conducted a large epidemiology study collecting data on hospitalisation for PE (from 2002 to 2012) in a population of about 13 million people in Northwestern Italy. Patients were identified using the ICD-9-CM codes: 415.11, 415.19; gender and age specific incidence rate of PE during the study period were estimated using the resident population for each year of the study. Furthermore, time trends in the in-hospital PE-related mortality and case fatality rate were calculated. Results were adjusted for possible confounders. A total of 60,853 patients (mean age 72.8 years, ± 14.1, 59.6 % females) with PE were included; the overall crude incidence rate for the entire study period was 55.4 and 40.6 events per year per 100,000 inhabitants for women and men, respectively (p < 0.001). However, this difference was completely lost after standardisation for age. The incidence of PE significantly increased in both genders during the study period. In-hospital case fatality rate significantly decreased throughout the study period (p < 0.001) in women (from 15.6 % to 10.2 %) and in men (from 17.6 % to 10.1 %). The observed decrease of the in-hospital case-fatality throughout the study period remained significant also after adjustment for possible confounders. In conclusion, time trends over an 11-year period show an increasing incidence of PE, but a significant reduction in mortality during hospitalisation. Reduction in the case fatality rate remained significant after adjustment for these possible confounders.

Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

 
  • References

  • 1 Goldhaber SZ. Venous thromboembolism: Epidemiology and magnitude of the problem. Best Pract Research Clinic Haematol 2012; 235-242.
  • 2 Agnelli G, Becattini C. Acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 266-274.
  • 3 Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN. et al. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 585-593.
  • 4 Oger E. Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. EPI-GETBP Study Group. Groupe d’Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 657-660.
  • 5 Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: evidence of overdiagnosis. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 831-837.
  • 6 de Miguel-Díez J, Jiménez-García R, Jiménez D. et al. Trends in hospital admissions for pulmonary embolism in Spain from 2002 to 2011. Eur Resp J 2014; 44: 942-950.
  • 7 Park B, Messina L, Dargon P. et al. Recent trends in clinical outcomes and resource utilisation for pulmonary embolism in the United States: findings from the nationwide inpatient sample. Chest 2009; 136: 983-990.
  • 8 Shiraev TP, Omari A, Rushworth RL. Trends in pulmonary embolism morbidity and mortality in Australia. Thromb Res 2013; 132: 19-25.
  • 9 Tsai J, Grosse SD, Grant AM. et al. Trends in in-hospital deaths among hospitali-sations with pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172: 960-961.
  • 10 Sakuma M, Konno Y, Shirato K. Increasing mortality from pulmonary embolism in Japan, 1951-2000. Circ J 2002; 66: 1144-1149.
  • 11 Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL. et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373-383.
  • 12 Ng AC, Chow V, Yong AS. et al. Prognostic impact of the Charlson comorbidity index on mortality following acute pulmonary embolism. Respiration 2013; 85: 408-416.
  • 13 Dentali F, Ageno W, Becattini C. et al. Prevalence and clinical history of incidental, asymptomatic pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Thromb Res 2010; 125: 518-522.
  • 14 Tapson VF. Acute pulmonary embolism: comment on time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States". Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 837-839.
  • 15 Papaioannou AI, Kastanis A, Malli F. et al. Predicting short-term mortality in patients with pulmonary embolism: a simple model. Am J Med Sci 2013; 345: 462-469.
  • 16 Aujesky D, Obrosky DS, Stone RA. et al. Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 172: 1041-1046.
  • 17 Donzé J, Le Gal G, Fine MJ. et al. Prospective validation of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index. A clinical prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2008; 100: 943-948.
  • 18 EINSTEIN-PE Investigators. Büller HR, Prins MH. et al. Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1287-1297.
  • 19 Dentali F, Di Minno MN, Gianni M. et al. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in patients with pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Intern Emerg Med 2015; 10: 507-514.
  • 20 Caprini JA. Risk assessment as a guide to thrombosis prophylaxis. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2010; 16: 448-452.
  • 21 Barbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V. et al. A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 08: 2450-2457.
  • 22 Nendaz M, Spirk D, Kucher N. et al. Multicentre validation of the Geneva Risk Score for hospitalised medical patients at risk of venous thromboembolism. Explicit ASsessment of Thromboembolic RIsk and Prophylaxis for Medical PATients in SwitzErland (ESTIMATE). Thromb Haemost 2014; 111: 531-538.
  • 23 Bosson JL, Pouchain D, Bergmann JF. et al. ETAPE Study Group. A prospective observational study of a cohort of outpatients with an acute medical event and reduced mobility: incidence of symptomatic thromboembolism and description of thromboprophylaxis practices. J Intern Med 2006; 260: 168-176.
  • 24 Dentali F, Douketis JD, Gianni M. et al. Meta-analysis: anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 278-288.
  • 25 Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF. et al. ENDORSE Investigators. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet 2008; 371: 387-394.
  • 26 Burns EM, Rigby E, Mamidanna R. et al. Systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. J Public Health 2012; 34: 138-148.
  • 27 Heckbert SR, Kooperberg C, Safford MM. et al. Comparison of self-report, hospital discharge codes, and adjudication of cardiovascular events in the Women’s Health Initiative. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 160: 1152-1158.