A randomised study for optimising crossover from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Summary

Ticagrelor has been endorsed by guidelines as the P2Y₁₂ inhibitor of choice in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Clinically, some patients on ticagrelor will require a switch to clopidogrel; however, the optimal strategy and pharmacodynamics effects of switching remain unknown. Patients with an indication to switch were randomly assigned to either a bolus arm (Clopidogrel 600 mg bolus followed by 75 mg daily, n=30) or a no-bolus arm (Clopidogrel 75 mg daily, n=30). Blood samples were collected at baseline, 12, 24, 48, 54, 60 and 72 hours (h) for assessment of platelet reactivity. The primary outcome was P2Y₁₂ reactivity units (PRU) at 72 h. Secondary outcomes included: PRUs at each time point, incidence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR), major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and TIMI bleeding at 30 days. Serial PRUs increased after switching to clopidogrel in both groups. At 72 h, no difference in PRU was observed (165.8 ± 71.0 vs 184.1 ± 67.7, bolus vs no bolus, respectively, p=0.19). At 48 h the PRUs were significantly lower in the bolus arm (114 ± 73.1 vs 165.1 ± 70.5, respectively; p=0.0076) and at 72 h, there was a significant reduction in incidence of HPR (26.7 % vs 56.7 %, p=0.02). No differences in MACE or TIMI bleeding were observed. Although a bolus strategy was not associated with improved platelet inhibition at 72 h; at 48 h, platelet inhibition was superior with reduced incidence of HPR. Larger studies will be required to determine its clinical significance. Until then, decision for giving a bolus of clopidogrel at the time of a switch may in part be dependent on the indication for switching, especially if there are concerns for bleeding risk.

Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

Keywords

Pharmacodynamics - acute coronary syndrome - platelet function - ticagrelor - clopidogrel

• References

• 1 Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR. et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 494-502.
• 2 Sabatine MS, Cannon CP, Gibson CM. et al. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1179-1189.
• 3 Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJ. et al. Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study. Lancet 2001; 358: 527-533.
• 4 Bainey KR, Lai TF, Mehta SR. Clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes: where are we now?. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105: 766-773.
• 5 Rollini F, Franchi F, Angiolillo DJ. Switching P2Y12-receptor inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 2016; 13: 11-27.
• 6 Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A. et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1045-1057.
• 7 Tanguay JF, Bell AD, Ackman ML. et al. Focused 2012 update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the use of antiplatelet therapy. Canad J Cardiol 2013; 29: 1334-1345.
• 8 Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG. et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: e139-228.
• 9 Bagai A, Chua D, Cohen EA. et al. Pharmacodynamic and Clinical Implications of Switching Between P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists: Considerations for Practice. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2014; 13: 156-158.
• 10 Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Deftereos S. et al. In-hospital switching of oral P2Y12 inhibitor treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: prevalence, predictors and short-term outcome. Am Heart J 2014; 167: 68-76 e2.
• 11 Storey RF, Becker RC, Harrington RA. et al. Characterisation of dyspnoea in PLATO study patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel and its association with clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2945-2953.
• 12 Price MJ, Angiolillo DJ, Teirstein PS. et al. Platelet reactivity and cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a time-dependent analysis of the Gauging Responsiveness with a VerifyNow P2Y12 assay: Impact on Thrombosis and Safety (GRAVITAS) trial. Circulation 2011; 124: 1132-1137.
• 13 Tantry US, Bonello L, Aradi D. et al. Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischaemia and bleeding. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 2261-2273.
• 14 Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K. et al. Randomized double-blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study. Circulation 2009; 120: 2577-2585.
• 15 Savcic M, Hauert J, Bachmann F. et al. Clopidogrel loading dose regimens: kinetic profile of pharmacodynamic response in healthy subjects. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999; 25 (Suppl. 02) 15-19.
• 16 Ferri N, Corsini A, Bellosta S. Pharmacology of the new P2Y12 receptor inhibitors: insights on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Drugs 2013; 73: 1681-1709.
• 17 Roberts JD, Wells GA, Le May MR. et al. Point-of-care genetic testing for personalisation of antiplatelet treatment (RAPID GENE): a prospective, randomised, proof-of-concept trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1705-1711.
• 18 Bagai A, Peterson ED, Honeycutt E. et al. In-hospital switching between adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights into contemporary practice from the TRANSLATE-ACS study. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2015; 04: 499-508.
• 19 Biscaglia S, Campo G, Pavasini R. et al. Occurrence, causes, and outcome after switching from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in a real-life scenario: data from a prospective registry. Platelets. 2016: 1-4.
• 20 Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH. et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001-2015.
• 21 Floyd CN, Passacquale G, Ferro A. Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists and their clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet 2012; 51: 429-442.
• 22 Angiolillo DJ, Saucedo JF, Deraad R. et al. Increased platelet inhibition after switching from maintenance clopidogrel to prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results of the SWAP (SWitching Anti Platelet) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 1017-1023.
• 23 Hibbert B, Maze R, Pourdjabbar A. et al. A comparative pharmacodynamic study of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the CAPITAL RELOAD study. PLoS One 2014; 09: e92078.
• 24 Price MJ, Endemann S, Gollapudi RR. et al. Prognostic significance of post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by a point-of-care assay on thrombotic events after drug-eluting stent implantation. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 992-1000.
• 25 Marcucci R, Gori AM, Paniccia R. et al. Cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction in acute coronary syndrome patients receiving coronary stenting are predicted by residual platelet reactivity to ADP detected by a point-of-care assay: a 12-month follow-up. Circulation 2009; 119: 237-242.
• 26 Price MJ, Nayak KR, Barker CM. et al. Predictors of heightened platelet reactivity despite dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103: 1339-1343.
• 27 Committee CS. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet 1996; 348: 1329-1339.
• 28 Berger JS, Bhatt DL, Cannon CP. et al. The relative efficacy and safety of clopidogrel in women and men a sex-specific collaborative meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 1935-1945.
• 29 Price MJ, Coleman JL, Steinhubl SR. et al. Onset and offset of platelet inhibition after high-dose clopidogrel loading and standard daily therapy measured by a point-of-care assay in healthy volunteers. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 681-684.