Summary
Apixaban, a direct acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC), was found to be non-inferior
to and safer as enoxaparin followed by warfarin for treatment of venous thromboembolism
(VTE) in the AMPLIFY trial. Information is needed on how bleeding events with DOACs
present and develop. In this post-hoc analysis, the clinical presentation and course
of all major and clinically relevant non major (CRNM) bleeding events in the AMPLIFY
trial were blindly classified by three investigators, using predesigned classification
schemes containing four categories. Odds ratios (OR) for classifying as category three
or four (representing a more severe clinical presentation and course) were calculated
between apixaban and enoxaparin/warfarin. In total, 63 major and 311 CRNM bleeding
events were classified. Of the major bleeds, a more severe clinical presentation occurred
in 28.5% of apixaban versus 44.9% of enoxaparin/warfarin related recipients (OR 0.49,
95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14–1.78). A severe clinical course was observed in
14.3% and in 12.2%, respectively (OR 1.19, 95%CI 0.21–6.69). Of the CRNM bleeding
events, a more severe clinical presentation and extent of clinical care was found
in 25% of apixaban recipients compared to 22.7% in the enoxaparin/warfarin group (OR
1.13, 95%CI 0.65–1.97). The clinical presentation and course of major and CRNM bleeds
were similar in apixaban and enoxaparin/warfarin treated patients. This finding should
reassure physicians and patients that even in the absence of a specific reversal agent,
apixaban is a convenient and safe choice for VTE.
Keywords
Anticoagulants - apixaban - coumarins - haemorrhage - venous thromboembolism