Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 2015; 114(02): 214-216
DOI: 10.1160/TH15-04-0298
Invited Editorial Focus
Schattauer GmbH

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in the cardiac catherisation laboratory: Friends or Foes?

Nay Min Htun
1   Atherothrombosis and Vascular Biology Lab, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
2   Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
,
Karlheinz Peter
1   Atherothrombosis and Vascular Biology Lab, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
2   Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
3   Heart Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 10 April 2015

Accepted: 10 April 2015

Publication Date:
01 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

See also:

Peri-procedural use of rivaroxaban in elective percutaneous coronary intervention to treat stable coronary artery diseaseThromb Haemost 2015; 114(08): 258-267
DOI: 10.1160/TH15-01-0061

Editorial Focus on Vranckx et al. Thromb Haemost 2015; 114: 258–267.

 

  • References

  • 1 Bernard A, Fauchier L, Pellegrin C. et al. Anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary stent implantation. Thromb Hae-most 2013; 110: 560-568.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rubboli A, Faxon DP, Juhani Airaksinen KE. et al. The optimal management of patients on oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary artery stenting. The 10th Anniversary Overview. Thromb Hae-most 2014; 112: 1080-1087.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F. et al. 2014 ESC/ EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2541-2619.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lip GY, Huber K, Andreotti F. et al. Management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention/ stenting. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: 13-28.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Husted S, de Caterina R, Andreotti F. et al. Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs): No longer new or novel. Thromb Hae-most 2014; 111: 781-782.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Le Heuzey JY, Ammentorp B, Darius H. et al. Differences among western European countries in anticoagulation management of atrial fibrillation. Data from the PREFER IN AF registry. Thromb Haemost 2014; 111: 833-841.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Enriquez A, Lip GY, Baranchuk A. Anticoagulation reversal in the era of the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants. Europace. 2015 Epub ahead of print.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lip GY, Windecker S, Huber K. et al. Management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary or valve interventions: a joint consensus document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and European Association of Acute Cardiac Care (ACCA) endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 3155-3179.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Capodanno D, Lip GY, Windecker S. et al. Triple antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients with acute coronary syndromes or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. EuroIntervention 2015; 10: 1015-1021.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 De Caterina R, Husted S, Wallentin L. et al. Vitamin K antagonists in heart disease: current status and perspectives (Section III). Position paper of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis--Task Force on Anticoagulants in Heart Disease. Thromb Haemost 2013; 110: 1087-1107.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gallego P, Roldan V, Marin F. et al. Cessation of oral anticoagulation in relation to mortality and the risk of thrombotic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost 2013; 110: 1189-1198.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Vranckx P, Leebeek F, Tijssen J. et al. Peri-procedural use of rivaroxaban in elective percutaneous coronary intervention to treat stable coronary artery disease (the X-PLORER trial). Thromb Haemost 2015; 114: 258-267.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ruiz-Nodar JM, Marin F, Hurtado JA. et al. Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy use in 426 patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and stent implantation implications for bleeding risk and prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 818-825.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Baron TH, Kamath PS, McBane RD. Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing invasive procedures. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 2113-2124.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Siegal D, Yudin J, Kaatz S. et al. Periprocedural heparin bridging in patients receiving vitamin K antagonists: systematic review and meta-analysis of bleeding and thromboembolic rates. Circulation 2012; 126: 1630-1639.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M. et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009; 157: 132-140.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J. et al. Radial versus fe-moral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multi-centre trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 1409-1420.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabró P. et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015 Epub ahead of print.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A. et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 2481-2489.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Baker NC, O’Connell EW, Htun WW. et al. Safety of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial versus femoral route in patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with warfarin. Am Heart J 2014; 168: 537-544.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD. et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 9-19.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G. et al. Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2218-2230.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kastrati A, Neumann FJ, Mehilli J. et al. Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 688-696.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Navarese EP, Schulze V, Andreotti F. et al. Comprehensive meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin with or without routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 08: 201-213.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Cavender MA, Sabatine MS. Bivalirudin versus heparin in patients planned for percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2014; 384: 599-606.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cassese S, Byrne RA, Laugwitz KL. et al. Bivalirudin versus heparin in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. EuroIntervention. 2014 Epub ahead of print.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Shahzad A, Kemp I, Mars C. et al. Unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (HEAT-PPCI): an open-label, single centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014; 384: 1849-1858.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC. et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: e44-122.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Vranckx P, Verheugt FW, de Maat MP. et al. A randomised study of dabigatran in elective percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary artery disease patients. EuroIntervention 2013; 08: 1052-1060.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar