Does the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay overestimate “therapeutic response” to clopidogrel?

Summary

In contrast to short thrombelastography (s-TEG) which utilises adenosine diphosphate (ADP) alone, the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (VN-P2Y12) additionally uses prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) as agonist to assess response to P2Y12 inhibitors. Based upon previous observations, we hypothesised that VN-P2Y12 overestimates the therapeutic effects of clopidogrel. Simultaneous assay with s-TEG and VN-P2Y12 was performed in 43 healthy volunteers and 170 patients either on or off clopidogrel. Furthermore, in 27 patients on clopidogrel 75 mg we compared the effects of adding 22 nM PGE1 to ADP on platelet aggregation in s-TEG to ADP alone. A higher proportion of individuals had a result indicating high platelet reactivity (HPR) with s-TEG than VN-P2Y12 in (i) 43 clopidogrel naïve volunteers (95.3% vs 81.4%, p = NS); (ii) 28 volunteers loaded with clopidogrel 600 mg (39.3% vs 10.7 %, p = < 0.01); (iii) 123 clopidogrel naïve patients (93.5% vs 78%, p = < 0.0001); (iv) 47 patients on clopidogrel 75 mg (42.6% vs 4.3%, p = < 0.0001). In 59 patients loaded with clopidogrel 600 mg/900 mg, a greater proportion had a “therapeutic response” with VN-P2Y12 compared to s-TEG, regardless of the threshold for defining HPR with VN-PY12 (P2Y12 reaction units ≥ 230 or 208). Furthermore, adding PGE1 to ADP in s-TEG potentiated the anti-aggregatory effects of clopidogrel compared with ADP alone. In conclusion, VN-P2Y12 overestimates the functional effects of clopidogrel in some individuals, possibly because it utilises PGE1 in addition to ADP. This could have implications for the ability of VN-P2Y12 to stratify patients as “responders” or “non-responders” to clopidogrel.

Keywords

Clopidogrel - high platelet reactivity - thrombelastography - VerifyNow P2Y12 assay - prostaglandin E1

• References

• 1 Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hiatt BL. et al. Clopidogrel for coronary stenting: response variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity. Circulation 2003; 107: 2908-2913.
• 2 Serebruany VL, Steinhubl SR, Berger PB. et al. Variability in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel among 544 individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 246-251.
• 3 Marcucci R, Gori AM, Paniccia R. et al. Cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction in acute coronary syndrome patients receiving coronary stenting are predicted by residual platelet reactivity to ADP detected by a point-of-care assay: a 12-month follow-up. Circulation 2009; 119: 237-242.
• 4 Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Guyer K. et al. Platelet reactivity in patients and recurrent events post-stenting: results of the PREPARE POST-STENTING Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1820-1826.
• 5 Price MJ, Endemann S, Gollapudi RR. et al. Prognostic significance of post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by point-of-care assay on thrombotic events after drug-eluting stents. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 992-1000.
• 6 Patti G, Nusca A, Mangiacapra F. et al. Point-of-care measurement of clopidogrel responsiveness predicts clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention results of the ARMYDA-PRO (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty-Platelet Reactivity Predicts Outcome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 1128-1133.
• 7 Tantry US, Bonello L, Aradi D. et al. Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischemia and bleeding. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 2261-2273.
• 8 Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A. et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1045-1057.
• 9 Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH. et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001-2015.
• 10 Curzen N. Antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes: beyond aspirin and clopidogrel. Heart 2012; 98: 1617-1619.
• 11 Price MJ, Berger PB, Teirstein PS. et al. Standard- vs high-dose clopidogrel based on platelet function testing after percutaneous coronary intervention: the GRAVITAS randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc 2011; 305: 1097-1105.
• 12 Collet JP, Cuisset T, Range G. et al. Bedside monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy for coronary stenting. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 2100-2109.
• 13 Trenk D, Stone GW, Gawaz M. et al. A randomized trial of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel after elective percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of drug-eluting stents: results of the TRIGGER-PCI (Testing Platelet Reactivity In Patients Undergoing Elective Stent Placement on Clopidogrel to Guide Alternative Therapy With Prasugrel) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 2159-2164.
• 14 Malinin A, Pokov A, Spergling M. et al. Monitoring platelet inhibition after clopidogrel with the VerifyNow-P2Y12(R) rapid analyzer: the VERIfy Thrombosis risk ASsessment (VERITAS) study. Thromb Res 2007; 119: 277-284.
• 15 Hobson AR, Petley GW, Dawkins KD. et al. A novel fifteen minute test for assessment of individual time-dependent clotting responses to aspirin and clopidogrel using modified thrombelastography. Platelets 2007; 18: 497-505.
• 16 Sambu N, Hobson A, Curzen N. „Short” thrombelastography as a test of platelet reactivity in response to antiplatelet therapy: validation and reproducibility. Platelets 2011; 22: 210-216.
• 17 Hobson AR, Qureshi Z, Banks P. et al. The Potential Value of Near Patient Platelet Function Testing in PCI: Randomised Comparison of 600 mg versus 900 mg Clopidogrel Loading Doses. Thrombosis 2010; 2010: 908272.
• 18 Sambu N, Radhakrishnan A, Dent H. et al. Personalised antiplatelet therapy in stent thrombosis: observations from the Clopidogrel Resistance in Stent Thrombosis (CREST) registry. Heart 2012; 98: 706-711.
• 19 Bliden KP, DiChiara J, Tantry US. et al. Increased risk in patients with high platelet aggregation receiving chronic clopidogrel therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: is the current antiplatelet therapy adequate?. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 657-666.
• 20 Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Guyer K. et al. Platelet reactivity in patients and recurrent events post-stenting: results of the PREPARE POST-STENTING Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1820-1826.
• 21 Craft RM, Chavez JJ, Bresee SJ. et al. A novel modification of the Thrombelasto-graph assay, isolating platelet function, correlates with optical platelet aggregation. J Lab Clin Med 2004; 143: 301-309.
• 22 Brar SS, ten Berg J, Marcucci R. et al. Impact of platelet reactivity on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention A collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 1945-1954.
• 23 Gurbel PA, Erlinge D, Ohman EM. et al. Platelet Function During Extended Prasugrel and Clopidogrel Therapy for Patients With ACS Treated Without Revascularization: The TRILOGY ACS Platelet Function Substudy. J Am Med Assoc 2012; 308: 1785-1794.
• 24 Campo G, Fileti L, de Cesare N. et al. Long-term clinical outcome based on aspirin and clopidogrel responsiveness status after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a 3T/2R (tailoring treatment with tirofiban in patients showing resistance to aspirin and/or resistance to clopidogrel) trial substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 1447-1455.
• 25 Huber K, Schror K. High on-treatment platelet reactivity--why should we be concerned?. Thromb Haemost 2013; 109: 789-791.
• 26 Cattaneo M. High on-treatment platelet reactivity--definition and measurement. Thromb Haemost 2013; 109: 792-798.
• 27 Dahlen JR, Price MJ, Parise H. et al. Evaluating the clinical usefulness of platelet function testing: considerations for the proper application and interpretation of performance measures. Thromb Haemost 2013; 109: 808-816.
• 28 Bidet A, Jais C, Puymirat E. et al. VerifyNow and VASP phosphorylation assays give similar results for patients receiving clopidogrel, but they do not always correlate with platelet aggregation. Platelets 2010; 21: 94-100.
• 29 Lordkipanidze M, Pharand C, Nguyen TA. et al. Comparison of four tests to assess inhibition of platelet function by clopidogrel in stable coronary artery disease patients. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 2877-2885.
• 30 Ko YG, Suh JW, Kim BH. et al. Comparison of 2 point-of-care platelet function tests, VerifyNow Assay and Multiple Electrode Platelet Aggregometry, for predicting early clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J 2011; 161: 383-390.
• 31 Jakubowski JA, Li YG, Small DS. et al. A Comparison of VerifyNow P2Y12 Point-of-Care Device and Light Transmission Aggregometry to Monitor Platelet Function with Prasugrel and Clopidogrel: An Integrated Analysis. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2010; 56: 29-37.
• 32 Kim IS, Jeong YH, Kang MK. et al. Correlation of high post-treatment platelet reactivity assessed by light transmittance aggregometry and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2010; 30: 486-495.
• 33 Gaglia MA, Torguson R, Pakala R. et al. Correlation between light transmission aggregometry, VerifyNow P2Y12, and VASP-P platelet reactivity assays following percutaneous coronary intervention. J Interv Cardiol 2011; 24: 529-534.
• 34 van Werkum JW, van der Stelt CA, Seesing TH. et al. A head-to-head comparison between the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and light transmittance aggregometry for monitoring the individual platelet response to clopidogrel in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 04: 2516-2518.
• 35 Fox SC, Behan MWH, Heptinstall S. Inhibition of ADP-induced intracellular Ca2+ responses and platelet aggregation by the P2Y12 receptor antagonists AR-C69931MX and clopidogrel is enhanced by prostaglandin E1. Cell Calcium 2004; 35: 39-46.