PDF herunterladen
Thromb Haemost 2013; 109(01): 47-52
DOI: 10.1160/TH12-07-0466
Blood Coagulation, Fibrinolysis and Cellular Haemostasis
Schattauer GmbH

Comparison of two methods for selection of out of hospital treatment in patients with acute pulmonary embolism

Wendy Zondag   *
1   Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
,
Paul L. den Exter   *
1   Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
,
Monique J. T. Crobach
2   Department of General Internal Medicine, Bronovo Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
,
Anneke Dolsma
3   Department of Pulmonology, Diaconessenhuis, Leiden, The Netherlands
,
Marjolein L. Donker
4   Department of General Internal Medicine, Rijnland Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands
,
Michiel Eijsvogel
5   Department of Pulmonology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
,
Laura M. Faber
6   Department of General Internal Medicine, Rode Kruis Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands
,
Herman M. A. Hofstee
7   Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Karin A. H. Kaasjager
8   Department of General Internal Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
,
Marieke J. H. A. Kruip
9   Department of Hematology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Geert Labots
10   Department of General Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
,
Christian F. Melissant
11   Department of Pulmonology, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
,
Michelle S. G. Sikkens
12   Department of Internal Medicine, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands
,
Menno V. Huisman
1   Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
› Institutsangaben Financial support: This study was funded by an unrestricted research grant from Glaxo Smith Klein, The Netherlands BV.
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received: 06. Juli 2012

Accepted after major revision: 08. Oktober 2012

Publikationsdatum:
27. November 2017 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the performance of two clinical decision rules to select patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) for outpatient treatment: the Hestia criteria and the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI). From 2008 to 2010, 468 patients with PE were triaged with the Hestia criteria for outpatient treatment: 247 PE patients were treated at home and 221 were treated as inpatients. The outcome of interest was all-cause 30-day mortality. In a post-hoc fashion, the sPESI items were scored and patients were classified according to the sPESI in low and high risk groups. Of the 247 patients treated at home, 189 (77%) patients were classified as low risk according to the sPESI and 58 patients (23%) as high risk. In total, 11 patients died during the first month; two patients treated at home and nine patients treated in-hospital. None of the patients treated at home died of fatal PE. Both the Hestia criteria and sPESI selected >50% of patients as low risk, with good sensitivity and negative predictive values for 30-day mortality: 82% and 99% for the Hestia criteria and 91% and 100% for the sPESI, respectively. The Hestia criteria and the sPESI classified different patients eligible for out-patient treatment, with similar low risks for 30-day mortality. This study suggests that the Hestia criteria may identify a proportion of high risk sPESI patiennts who can be safely treated at home, this however requires further validation.

Keywords

Pulmonary embolism - thrombosis - outpatient treatment - mortality

* Both authors contributed equally to the manuscript.


 

  • References

  • 1 Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ. et al. Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141: e419S-e494S. DOI:10.1378/chest.11-2301.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S. et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 2276-2315. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn475.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kovacs MJ, Anderson D, Morrow B. et al. Outpatient treatment of pulmonary embolism with dalteparin. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 209-211.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Zondag W, Mos IC, Creemers-Schild D. et al. Outpatient treatment in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: the Hestia Study. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 09: 1500-1507. DOI:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04388.x.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Agterof MJ, Schutgens RE, Snijder RJ. et al. Out of hospital treatment of acute pulmonary embolism in patients with a low NT-proBNP level. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 08: 1235-1241. DOI:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03831.x.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Otero R, Uresandi F, Jimenez D. et al. Home treatment in pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res 2010; 126: e1-e5. DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2009.09.026.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Aujesky D, Obrosky DS, Stone RA. et al. Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 172: 1041-1046. DOI:10.1164/rccm.200506-862OC.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Donze J, Le Gal G, Fine MJ. et al. Prospective validation of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index. A clinical prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2008; 100: 943-948.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Aujesky D, Roy PM, Verschuren F. et al. Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2011; 378: 41-48. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60824-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jimenez D, Aujesky D, Moores L. et al. Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170: 1383-1389. DOI:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.199.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Howard L, Salooja N. Outpatient management of pulmonary embolism. Lancet 2011; 378: 5-6. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60932-X.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Erkens PM, Gandara E, Wells PS. et al. Does the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index accurately identify low-risk patients eligible for outpatient treatment?. Thromb Res 2011; 129: 710-714. DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2011.08.025.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Righini M, Roy PM, Meyer G. et al. The Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI): validation of a clinical prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 09: 2115-2117. DOI:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04469.x.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sam A, Sanchez D, Gomez V. et al. The shock index and the simplified PESI for identification of low-risk patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 762-766. DOI:10.1183/09031936.00070110.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sorensen HT, Mellemkjaer L, Olsen JH. et al. Prognosis of cancers associated with venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1846-1850. DOI:10.1056/NEJM200012213432504.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar