Thromb Haemost 2012; 107(06): 1027-1034
DOI: 10.1160/TH11-11-0787
Review Article
Schattauer GmbH

Role of new anticoagulants for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopaedic surgery and in hospitalised acutely ill medical patients

Walter Ageno
1   University of Insubria-Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy
,
Alex C. Spyropoulos
2   University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
,
Alexander G. G. Turpie
3   McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Financial support: The authors would like to acknowledge Claudia Wiedemann, who provided editorial support with funding from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Research & Development, L.L.C (formerly Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.).
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 11 November 2011

Accepted after major revision: 27 January 2012

Publication Date:
29 November 2017 (online)

Summary

Anticoagulation therapy for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events is indicated in patients after major orthopaedic surgery and in hospitalised acutely ill medical patients, who have a high or moderate risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), respectively. Clinical trials have clearly demonstrated that short-term anticoagulation reduces the risk of VTE in these patient groups and that longer-term anticoagulation is beneficial for some indications. Evidence-based guidelines for throm-boprophylaxis have been developed based on these studies. However, despite these guidelines, thromboprophylaxis is still underused, or used suboptimally, in many patients. This is, in part, because of the limitations of traditional anticoagulants such as unfractionated heparin, lowmolecular-weight heparin, synthetic pentasaccharides, and vitamin K antagonists. Newer oral anticoagulants, such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran etexilate, have certain advantages over traditional agents. They can be administered orally at a fixed dose without routine coagulation monitoring and have minimal food and drug interactions. These characteristics may result in better adherence to guidelines and improved patient outcomes. This review provides an overview of phase III clinical trial data for these newer anticoagulants in major orthopaedic surgery and in hospitalised acutely ill medical patients, and discusses their potential for extended use in the post-hospital discharge setting. All three newer oral anticoagulants are approved in many countries for the prevention of VTE after hip replacement or knee replacement surgery in adult patients, and it is likely that these drugs will contribute considerably towards reducing the substantial healthcare burden associated with VTE.

 
  • References

  • 1 Spyropoulos AC, Mahan C. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the medical patient: controversies and perspectives. Am J Med 2009; 122: 1077-1084.
  • 2 Dobesh PP. Economic burden of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients. Pharmacotherapy 2009; 29: 943-953.
  • 3 Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF. et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133: 381S-453S.
  • 4 Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN. et al. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 809-815.
  • 5 Khorana AA. Cancer and thrombosis: implications of published guidelines for clinical practice. Ann Oncol 2009; 20: 1619-1630.
  • 6 Cohen AT, Davidson BL, Gallus AS. et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in older acute medical patients: randomised placebo controlled trial. Br Med J 2006; 332: 325-329.
  • 7 Samama MM, Cohen AT, Darmon JY. et al. A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 793-800.
  • 8 Leizorovicz A, Cohen AT, Turpie AGG. et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of dalteparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Circulation 2004; 110: 874-879.
  • 9 Hull RD, Schellong SM, Tapson VF. et al. Extended-duration venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with recently reduced mobility: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153: 8-18.
  • 10 Cohen AT, Spiro TE, Büller HR. et al. Rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. American College of Cardiology Congress 60th Annual Scientific Session. New Orleans, USA: 2-5 April 2011; Oral presentation.
  • 11 Becattini C, Lignani A, Agnelli G. New anticoagulants for the prevention of venous thromboembolism. Drug Des Devel Ther 2010; 4: 49-60.
  • 12 Prandoni P, Samama MM. Risk stratification and venous thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical and cancer patients. Br J Haematol 2008; 141: 587-597.
  • 13 Turpie AGG, Leizorovicz A. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in medically ill patients: a clinical update. Postgrad Med J 2006; 82: 806-809.
  • 14 Anderson Jr FA, Spencer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107: I9-I16.
  • 15 Anderson Jr FA, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ. et al. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 933-938.
  • 16 Barbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V. et al. A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: The Padua Prediction Score. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 2450-2457.
  • 17 Spyropoulos AC. Risk assessment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2010; 16: 419-425.
  • 18 Connolly GC, Khorana AA. Emerging risk stratification approaches to cancer-associated thrombosis: risk factors, biomarkers and a risk score. Thromb Res 2010; 125 (Suppl. 02) S1-S7.
  • 19 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Preventing venous thromboembolic disease in patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty: evidencebased guideline and evidence report. Available at: http://www.aaos.org/Research/guidelines/VTE/VTE_full_guideline.pdf Accessed December 21, 2011.
  • 20 Huo MH, Muntz J. Extended thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparins after hospital discharge in high-risk surgical and medical patients: a review. Clin Ther 2009; 31: 1129-1141.
  • 21 Nicolaides AN, Fareed J, Kakkar AK. et al. Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. International Consensus Statement (guidelines according to scientific evidence). Int Angiol 2006; 25: 101-161.
  • 22 Lyman GH, Khorana AA, Falanga A. et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline: recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 5490-5505.
  • 23 Spyropoulos AC. Outpatient-based primary and secondary thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2008; 14: 63-74.
  • 24 Ufer M. Comparative efficacy and safety of the novel oral anticoagulants dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban in preclinical and clinical development. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: 572-585.
  • 25 Bayer AGPharma. Xarelto® (rivaroxaban) Summary of Product Characteristics. 2011 Available at: http://www.medicines.org.uk/EMC/medicine/21265 Accessed January 4, 2012.
  • 26 Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer EEIG. Eliquis (apixaban) Summary of Product Characteristics. 2011 Available at: http://www.medicines.org.uk/EMC/medicine/24988/ Accessed January 4, 2012.
  • 27 Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate) Summary of Product Characteristics. 2011. Available at: http://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/20760 Accessed January 4, 2012.
  • 28 Eriksson BI, Borris LC, Friedman RJ. et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip arthroplasty. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2765-2775.
  • 29 Kakkar AK, Brenner B, Dahl OE. et al. Extended duration rivaroxaban versus short-term enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008; 372: 31-39.
  • 30 Lassen MR, Ageno W, Borris LC. et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for throm-boprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2776-2786.
  • 31 Turpie AGG, Lassen MR, Davidson BL. et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty (RECORD4): a randomised trial. Lancet 2009; 373: 1673-1680.
  • 32 Turpie AGG, Lassen MR, Eriksson BI. et al. Rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty. Pooled analysis of four studies. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105: 444-453.
  • 33 Lassen MR, Raskob GE, Gallus A. et al. Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 594-604.
  • 34 Lassen MR, Raskob GE, Gallus A. et al. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement (ADVANCE-2): a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 2010; 375: 807-815.
  • 35 Lassen MR, Gallus A, Raskob GE. et al. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip replacement. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 2487-2498.
  • 36 Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Rosencher N. et al. Oral dabigatran etexilate vs. subcutaneous enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee replacement: the RE-MODEL randomized trial. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5: 2178-2185.
  • 37 Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Rosencher N. et al. Dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2007; 370: 949-956.
  • 38 Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Huo MH. et al. Oral dabigatran versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after primary total hip arthroplasty (RE-NOVATE II). A randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105: 721-729.
  • 39 The RE-MOBILIZE Writing Committee. Oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate vs North American enoxaparin regimen for prevention of venous thromboembolism after knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 1-9.
  • 40 Friedman RJ, Dahl OE, Rosencher N. et al. Dabigatran versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty: A pooled analysis of three trials. Thromb Res 2010; 126: 175-182.
  • 41 Mavrakanas T, Bounameaux H. The potential role of new oral anticoagulants in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism. Pharmacol Ther 2011; 130: 46-58.
  • 42 Cohen AT, Spiro TE, Büller HR. et al. Extended-duration rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients: MAGELLAN study protocol. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2011; 31: 407-416.
  • 43 Goldhaber SZ, Leizorovicz A, Kakkar AK. et al. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 2167-2177.
  • 44 Ginzburg E, Dujardin F. Physicians' perceptions of the definition of major bleeding in major orthopedic surgery: results of an international survey. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2011; 31: 188-195.
  • 45 Friedman RJ, Gallus AS, Cushner FD. et al. Physician compliance with guidelines for deep-vein thrombosis prevention in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Curr Med Res Opin 2008; 24: 87-97.
  • 46 Huang J, Cao Y, Liao C. et al. Apixaban versus enoxaparin in patients with total knee arthroplastyA meta-analysis of randomised trials. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105: 245-253.
  • 47 Wolowacz SE, Roskell NS, Plumb JM. et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost 2009; 101: 77-85.
  • 48 Abdel-Razeq H. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for hospitalized medical patients, current status and strategies to improve. Ann Thorac Med 2010; 5: 195-200.
  • 49 Jaffer AK, Amin AN, Brotman DJ. et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in the hospitalized medical patient. Cleve Clin J Med 2008; 75 (Suppl. 03) S7-S16.
  • 50 Goldhaber SZ. Eradication of hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 2010; 104: 1089-1092.
  • 51 Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF. et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet 2008; 371: 387-394.
  • 52 Tapson VF, Decousus H, Pini M. et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients: Findings from the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism. Chest 2007; 132: 936-945.
  • 53 Goldhaber SZ, Tapson VF. A prospective registry of 5,451 patients with ultrasound-confirmed deep vein thrombosis. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 259-262.
  • 54 Kahn SR, Panju A, Geerts W. et al. Multicenter evaluation of the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients in Canada. Thromb Res 2007; 119: 145-155.
  • 55 Kleber FX, Witt C, Vogel G. et al. Randomized comparison of enoxaparin with un-fractionated heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in medical patients with heart failure or severe respiratory disease. Am Heart J 2003; 145: 614-621.
  • 56 Lechler E, Schramm W, Flosbach CW. The venous thrombotic risk in non-surgical patients: epidemiological data and efficacy/safety profile of a low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin). The Prime Study Group. Haemostasis 1996; 26 (Suppl. 02) 49-56.
  • 57 Spencer FA, Lessard D, Emery C. et al. Venous thromboembolism in the outpatient setting. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 1471-1475.
  • 58 Scannapieco G, Ageno W, Airoldi A. et al. Incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolism in post-acute care patients. A prospective cohort study. Thromb Haemost 2010; 104: 734-740.
  • 59 Agnelli G, Gussoni G, Bianchini C. et al. Nadroparin for the prevention of thromboembolic events in ambulatory patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid cancer receiving chemotherapy: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 943-949.
  • 60 Amin A, Spyropoulos AC, Dobesh P. et al. Are hospitals delivering appropriate VTE prevention? The venous thromboembolism study to assess the rate of thromboprophylaxis (VTE start). J Thromb Thrombolysis 2010; 29: 326-339.
  • 61 Sarasin FP, Bounameaux H. Out of hospital antithrombotic prophylaxis after total hip replacement: low-molecular-weight heparin, warfarin, aspirin or nothing? A cost-effectiveness analysis. Thromb Haemost 2002; 87: 586-592.
  • 62 Warwick D, Friedman RJ, Agnelli G. et al. Insufficient duration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement when compared with the time course of thromboembolic events: findings from the Global Orthopaedic Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 799-807.
  • 63 Caprini JA, Hyers TM. Compliance with antithrombotic guidelines: Current practice, barriers, and strategies for improvement. Manag Care 2006; 15: 49-66.
  • 64 Amin AN, Lin J, Ryan A. Need to improve thromboprophylaxis across the continuum of care for surgical patients. Adv Ther 2010; 27: 81-93.
  • 65 Spyropoulos AC. Brave new world: the current and future use of novel anticoagulants. Thromb Res 2008; 123 (Suppl. 01) S29-S35.
  • 66 Huo MH. New oral anticoagulants in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in orthopaedic patients: are they really better?. Thromb Haemost 2011; 106: 45-57.
  • 67 Decousus H, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF. et al. Factors at admission associated with bleeding risk in medical patients: findings from the IMPROVE investigators. Chest 2011; 139: 69-79.