Diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis: Adherence to guidelines and outcomes in real-world health care^[*]

Summary

Current guidelines recommend optimised algorithms for diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). There is little data to determine to what extent real-world health care adheres to guidelines, and which outcome in terms of diagnostic efficiency and safety is achieved. This registry involved patients with clinically suspected DVT of the leg recruited in German ambulatory care between October and December 2005. Registry items were: diagnostic methods applied; diagnostic categories at day 1; and venous thromboembolic events up to 90 days in patients without firmly established DVT. A total of 4,976 patients were recruited in 326 centres. Venous ultrasonography was performed in 4,770 patients (96%), D-dimer assay in 1,773 patients (36%) and venography in 288 patients (6%). At day 1, DVT was confirmed in 1,388 patients (28%), and ruled out in 3,389 patients (68%), and work-up was inconclusive in 199 patients (4%).The rate of venous thromboembolism at 90 days was 0.34% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09 to 0.88) in patients in whom the diagnosis of DVT had been ruled out, and 2.50% (95% CI: 0.69 to 6.28) in patients with inconclusive diagnostic workup. This nationwide evaluation in German ambulatory care revealed that the diagnostic work-up for suspected DVT did not adhere to current guidelines. However, the overall diagnostic safety was excellent, although there is potential for improvement in a well defined minority of patients.

The TULIPA registry was funded by GlaxoSmithKline GmbH und Co KG, Munich.

Keywords

Deep-vein thrombosis - guidelines - clinical decision rules - ultrasonography - health care research

• References

• 1 Tapson VF, Carroll BA, Davidson BL. et al. The diagnostic approach to acute venous thromboembolism. Clinical practice guideline. American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160: 1043-1066.
• 2 Goodacre S, Sampson F, Stevenson M. et al. Measurement of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of non-invasive diagnostic testing strategies for deep vein thrombosis. Health Technol Assess 2006; 10: 1-168 iii-iv.
• 3 Wells PS. Integrated strategies for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 05 (Suppl. 01) 41-50.
• 4 Kyrle PA, Eichinger S. Deep vein thrombosis. Lancet 2005; 365: 1163-1174.
• 5 Hach-Wunderle V. Interdisciplinary S2 guideline. Diagnosis and therapy of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Hamostaseologie 2005; 25: 219-236.
• 6 Blann AD, Lip GY. Venous thromboembolism. Br Med J 2006; 332: 215-219.
• 7 Qaseem A, Snow V, Barry P. et al. Current diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in primary care: a clinical practice guideline from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 454-458.
• 8 Arnason T, Wells PS, Forster AJ. Appropriateness of diagnostic strategies for evaluating suspected venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 2007; 97: 195-201.
• 9 Smith C, Mensah A, Mal S. et al. Is pretest probability assessment on emergency department in patients with suspected venous thromboembolism documented before SimpliRED D-dimer testing?. CJEM 2008; 10: 519-523.
• 10 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M. et al. Evaluation of D-Dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1227-1235.
• 11 Blättler W, Martinez I, Blättler IK. Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and alternative diseases in symptomatic outpatients. Eur J Intern Med 2004; 15: 305-311.
• 12 Schellong SM. Venous ultrasonography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients: an updated review. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2008; 14: 374-380.
• 13 Sevestre MA, Labarère J, Casez L. et al. Accuracy of complete compression ultrasound in ruling out suspected deep venous thrombosis in the ambulatory setting - A prospective cohort study. Thromb Haemost 2009; 102: 166-172.
• 14 Palareti G, Agnelli G, Imberti D. et al. Do Italian vascular centers look for isolated calf deep vein thrombosis? Analysis of isolated calf deep vein thromboses included in the ‘‘Master’’ Registry. Int Angiol 2008; 27: 482-488.
• 15 Fancher TL, White RH, Kravitz RL. Combined use of rapid D-dimer testing and estimation of clinical probability in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: systematic review. Br Med J 2004; 329: 821.
• 16 Schellong SM, Schwarz T, Halbritter K. et al. Complete compression ultrasonography of the leg veins as a single test for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 2003; 89: 228-234.
• 17 Elias A, Mallard L, Elias M. et al. A single complete ultrasound investigation of the venous network for the diagnostic management of patients with a clinically suspected first episode of deep venous thrombosis of the lower limb. Thromb Haemost 2003; 89: 221-227.
• 18 Stevens SM, Elliott CG, Chan KJ. et al. Withholding anticoagulation after a negative result on duplex ultrasonography for suspected symptomatic deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 985-991.
• 19 Subramaniam RM, Heath R, Chou T. et al. Deep venous thrombosis: Withholding anticoagulation therapy after negative complete lower limb US findings. Radiology 2005; 237: 348-352.
• 20 Righini M, Paris S, Le Gal G. et al. Clinical relevance of distal deep vein thrombosis. Review of literature data. Thromb Haemost 2006; 95: 56-64.
• 21 Büller HR, Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Hoes AW. et al. Safely ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150: 229-235.
• 22 Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF. et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet 2008; 371: 387-394.
• 23 Montes-Santiago J, Lado Castro-Rial M, Guijarro Merino R. et al. Current diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in Spain: ventilation-perfusion lung scan versus helical CT. Findings from the National Health Service and RIETE Registry. Med Clin (Barc) 2008; 130: 568-572.
• 24 Ageno W, Agnelli G, Imberti D. et al. Factors associated with the timing of diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: results from the MASTER registry. Thromb Res 2008; 121: 751-756.