An optimized embryonic stem cell model for consistent gene expression and developmental studies

Summary

In vitro differentiation of embryonic stem (ES) cells results in generation of tissue-specific somatic cells and may represent a powerful tool for general understanding of cellular differentiation and developmentin vivo. Culturing of most ES cell lines requires murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEF), which may influence adventitiously the genetic differentiation program of ES cells. We compared the expression profile of key developmental genes in the MEF-independent CGR8 ES cell line and in the MEFdependent D3 ES cell line. Using neomycin-resistant MEFs we demonstrated that MEFs are able to contaminate the D3 ES cells even after removing the MEFs. Subsequently, optimal differentiation conditions were established for the differentiation of CGR8 ES cells into various germ layer cells. Detailed gene expression studies in differentiating CGR8 cells were done by RTPCR analysis and by microarray analysis demonstrating a general trend of the assessed genes to be expressed either in 3 days- or 10-days old embryoid bodies (EBs) when compared to undifferentiated ES cells. Subsets within the various functional gene classes were defined that are specifically up- or down-regulated in concert. Interestingly, the present results demonstrate that developmental processes toward germ layer formation are irreversible and mostly independent of the culture conditions. Notably, apoptotic and mitochondrial ribosomal genes were downand up-regulated in 10-days old EBs, respectively, whereas compared to the 3-days old EBs whereas the activity of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 decreased with progressive development. This article defines a platform for ES cell differentiation and gene expression studies.

Supplementary information available online atwww.uni-koeln.de/med-fak/physiologie/np/sachinidis.htm

Keywords

CGR8 embryonic stem cells - gene expression - microarrays - development

^* Contributed equally

• References

• 1 Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981; 292: 154-6.
• 2 Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78: 7634-8.
• 3 Boeuf H, Hauss C, Graeve F D. et al. Leukemia inhibitory factor-dependent transcriptional activation in embryonic stem cells. J Cell Biol 1997; 138: 1207-17.
• 4 Niwa H, Miyazaki J, Smith AG. Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nat Genet 2000; 24: 372-6.
• 5 Chambers I, Colby D, Robertson M. et al. Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2003; 113: 643-55.
• 6 Keller GM. In vitro differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1995; 7: 862-9.
• 7 Rodaway A, Patient R. Mesendoderm. an ancient germ layer? Cell 2001; 105: 169-72.
• 8 Sachinidis A, Fleischmann BK, Kolossov E. et al. Cardiac specific differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Cardiovasc Res 2003; 58: 278-91.
• 9 Trounson A. Human embryonic stem cells: mother of all cell and tissue types. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002; 4 (Suppl. 01) 58-63.
• 10 Desbaillets I, Ziegler U, Groscurth P. et al. Embryoid bodies: an in vitro model of mouse embryogenesis. Exp Physiol 2000; 85: 645-51.
• 11 Oettgen P. Transcriptional regulation of vascular development. Circ Res 2001; 89: 380-8.
• 12 Doss MX, Koehler CI, Gissel C. et al. Embryonic stem cells: a promising tool for cell replacement therapy. J Cell Mol Med 2004; 8: 465-73.
• 13 Bain G, Ray WJ, Yao M. et al. Retinoic acid promotes neural and represses mesodermal gene expression in mouse embryonic stem cells in culture. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996; 223: 691-4.
• 14 Karbanova J, Mokry J. Histological and histochemical analysis of embryoid bodies. Acta Histochem 2002; 104: 361-5.
• 15 Kawase E, Suemori H, Takahashi N. et al. Strain difference in establishment of mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell lines. Int J Dev Biol 1994; 38: 385-90.
• 16 Baharvand H, Matthaei KI. Culture condition difference for establishment of new embryonic stem cell lines from the C57BL/6 and BALB/c mouse strains. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2004; 40: 76-81.
• 17 Schoonjans L, Kreemers V, Danloy S. et al. Improved generation of germline-competent embryonic stem cell lines from inbred mouse strains. Stem Cells 2003; 21: 90-7.
• 18 Nichols J, Evans EP, Smith AG. Establishment of germ-line-competent embryonic stem (ES) cells using differentiation inhibiting activity. Development 1990; 110: 1341-8.
• 19 Mehlen P, Mehlen A, Godet J. et al. hsp27 as a switch between differentiation and apoptosis in murine embryonic stem cells. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 31657-65.
• 20 Wakayama T, Rodriguez I, Perry A C. et al. Mice cloned from embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 14984-9.
• 21 Toumadje A, Kusumoto K, Parton A. et al. Pluripotent differentiation in vitro of murine ES-D3 embryonic stem cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2003; 39: 449-53.
• 22 Prelle K, Wobus AM, Krebs O. et al. Overexpression of insulin-like growth factor-II in mouse embryonic stem cells promotes myogenic differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000; 277: 631-8.
• 23 Wobus AM, Guan K, Yang H T. et al. Embryonic stem cells as a model to study cardiac, skeletal muscle, and vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation. Methods Mol Biol 2002; 185: 127-56.
• 24 Pesce M, Scholer HR. Oct-4: gatekeeper in the beginnings of mammalian development. Stem Cells 2001; 19: 271-8.
• 25 Grabel L, Becker S, Lock L. et al. Using EC and ES cell culture to study early development: recent observations on Indian hedgehog and Bmps. Int J Dev Biol 1998; 42: 917-25.
• 26 Izumi M, Fujio Y, Kunisada K. et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 inhibits serum deprivation-induced apoptosis of neonatal cardiac myocytes through activation of the Smad1 pathway. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 31133-41.
• 27 Conlon FL, Smith JC. Interference with brachyury function inhibits convergent extension, causes apoptosis, and reveals separate requirements in the FGF and activin signalling pathways. Dev Biol 1999; 213: 85-100.
• 28 Showell C, Binder O, Conlon FL. T-box genes in early embryogenesis. Dev Dyn 2004; 229: 201-18.
• 29 Itskovitz-Eldor J, Schuldiner M, Karsenti D. et al. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into embryoid bodies compromising the three embryonic germ layers. Mol Med 2000; 6: 88-95.
• 30 Becker S, Casanova J, Grabel L. Localization of endoderm-specific mRNAs in differentiating F9 embryoid bodies. Mech Dev 1992; 37: 3-12.
• 31 Hipfner DR, Cohen SM. Connecting proliferation and apoptosis in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004; 5: 805-15.
• 32 Marshall CJ. Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Cell 1995; 80: 179-85.
• 33 Gissel C, Nierhoff D, Fleischmann B K. et al. Culture of embryoid bodies. Practical Methods in Cardiovascular Research. Springer Verlag; 2005: 577-91.
• 34 Sachinidis A, Gissel C, Nierhoff D. et al. Identification of plateled-derived growth factor-BB as cardiogenesis-inducing factor in mouse embryonic stem cells under serum-free conditions. Cell Physiol Biochem 2003; 13: 423-9.
• 35 Sachinidis A, Gouni-Berthold I, Seul C. et al. Early intracellular signalling pathway of ethanol in vascular smooth muscle cells. Br J Pharmacol 1999; 128: 1761-71.
• 36 Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976; 72: 248-54.
• 37 Sachinidis A, Skach RA, Seul C. et al. Inhibition of the PDGF beta-receptor tyrosine phosphorylation and its downstream intracellular signal transduction pathway in rat and human vascular smooth muscle cells by different catechins. FASEB J 2002; 16: 893-5.
• 38 Saeed AI, Sharov V, White J. et al. TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques 2003; 34: 374-8.
• 39 Sturn A, Quackenbush J, Trajanoski Z. Genesis: cluster analysis of microarray data. Bioinformatics 2002; 18: 207-8.
• 40 Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown P O. et al. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95: 14863-8.
• 41 Zeeberg BR, Feng W, Wang G. et al. GoMiner: a resource for biological interpretation of genomic and proteomic data. Genome Biol 2003; 4: R28.
• 42 Breitling R, Amtmann A, Herzyk P. Graph-based iterative Group Analysis enhances microarray interpretation. BMC Bioinformatics 2004; 5: 100.
• 43 Diehn M, Sherlock G, Binkley G. et al. SOURCE: a unified genomic resource of functional annotations, ontologies, and gene expression data. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 219-23.
• 44 el Meziane A, Callen JC, Mounolou JC. Mitochondrial gene expression during Xenopus laevis development: a molecular study. EMBO J 1989; 8: 1649-55.