Effect of age on the performance of a diagnostic strategy based on clinical probability, spiral computed tomography and venous compression ultrasonography

Summary

As the prevalence of PE increases with age, the effect of age on the diagnostic work-up in front of a clinical suspicion of PE deserves exploration. In this retrospective analysis, we used the data from 1041 consecutive suspected PE patients. The patients were divided into three groups according to tertiles of age: under 54 years, 54 to 73 years and above 73 years. The prevalence of PE in patients with respectively low, intermediate and high pretest clinical probability was expressed within each age group. We studied the effect of age on the results observed in three main groups of patients, after performing CT scan and ultrasonography (CUS): (1) patients with inconclusive results; (2) patients with negative findings on both exams and non high pretest clinical probability;(3) patients with positive findings. The prevalence of PE increased significantly with age, in overall, as well as in patients with low or intermediate pretest clinical probability. An analysis according to the three main diagnostic groups showed that: (1) the distribution of inconclusive spiral CT or CUS examinations was not different between age groups;(2) no thromboembolic event occurred in untreated patients with low or intermediate clinical probability aged under 54 years of age, whereas 7 events were diagnosed in patients aged over 73 years (p< 0.001); (3) a higher proportion of older patients had a positive result at both spiral CT and CUS examinations. The percentage of positive CT scans in the case of negative or inconclusive CUS results was not different between age groups; conversely, in the case of a negative or inconclusive CT scan, the percentage of positive CUS was higher in older patients. In conclusion, management of elderly suspected PE patients appears to be different from both the work-up and the outcome perspectives.

Keywords

Pulmonary embolism - age - pretest clinical probability - helical computed tomography - venous compression ultrasonography of the lower limbs

^* Other members listed in the appendix.

• References

• 1 Oger E. Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. EPIGETBP Study Group. Groupe d'Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 657-60.
• 2 Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER). Lancet 1999; 353: 1386-9.
• 3 Kearon C. Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107 (23 Suppl 1) I22-I30.
• 4 Mottier D, Couturaud F, Oger E. et al. Clinical usefulness of D-dimer tests in excluding pulmonary embolism is highly dependent upon age. Thromb Haemost 1998; 80: 527
• 5 Righini M, Goehring C, Bounameaux H. et al. Effects of age on the performance of common diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2000; 109: 357-61.
• 6 Righini M, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Effect of age on the performance of single detector helical computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2004; 91: 296-9.
• 7 Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G. et al. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet 2002; 360: 1914-20.
• 8 van Strijen MJ, de Monye W, Schiereck J. et al. Single-detector helical computed tomography as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter clinical management study of 510 patients. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 307-14.
• 9 Perrier A, Roy PM, Aujesky D. et al. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study. Am J Med 2004; 116: 291-9.
• 10 Coche EE, Hamoir XL, Hammer FD. et al. Using dual-detector helical CT angiography to detect deep venous thrombosis in patients with suspicion of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic value and additional findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 1035-9.
• 11 Katz DS, Loud PA, Bruce D. et al. Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography: a comprehensive review. Radiographics 2002; 22 Spec No S3-19.
• 12 Richman PB, Wood J, Kasper DM. et al. Contribution of indirect computed tomography venography to computed tomography angiography of the chest for the diagnosis of thromboembolic disease in two United States emergency departments. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1: 652-7.
• 13 Kruip MJ, Leclercq MG, van der HC. et al. Diagnostic strategies for excluding pulmonary embolism in clinical outcome studies. A systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 941-51.
• 14 Hartmann IJ, Prins MH, Buller HR. et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: impact of selection bias in prospective diagnostic studies. ANTELOPE Study Group. Advances in New Technologies Evaluating the Localization of Pulmonary Embolism. Thromb Haemost 2001; 85: 604-8.
• 15 Righini M, Le Gal G, Perrier A. et al. Effect of age on the assessment of clinical probability of pulmonary embolism by prediction rules. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 1206-8.
• 16 Chagnon I, Bounameaux H, Aujesky D. et al. Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2002; 113: 269-75.
• 17 Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR. et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 997-1005.
• 18 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M. et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 416-20.