Summary
The use of warfarin with a range INR of 2.0-3.0 is recommended in prevention of stroke
for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, in particular those older than
75 years. The risk of bleeding that is associated with this range of INR has led to
evaluate lower ranges (low-dose or fixed minidose) in terms of risks and benefits.
A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials evaluating ‘low-intensity’ ‘minidose’
or ‘low-dose anticoagulant’ treatment for prevention of thromboembolic events in AF
was conducted by two independent reviewers. Study quality was evaluated in a blinded
fashion. Four original studies were retrieved. Outcome events were determined in various
treatment groups: ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, thromboses (ischemic stroke,
systemic embolism or myocardial infarction), vascular death, major hemorrhage and
hemorrhagic death. Results obtained with a random effects model were expressed as
a common relative risk. Adjusted-dose warfarin compared with lower dose warfarin (INR
≤1.6) in 2108 randomised patients significantly reduced the risk of any thrombosis:
Relative risk (RR): 0.50 (95% CI; 0.25 to 0.97).The RR was 0.46 (95%CI ; 0.2 to 1.07)
for ischemic stroke. Inversely lower dose did not statistically decrease the risk
for major hemorrhage compared to adjusted-dose: RR adjusted-dose vs lower dose: 1.23
(95% CI ; 0.67-2.27). The RR was 0.97 (95 % CI 0.27-3.54) for hemorrhagic death. Our
meta-analysis showed that adjusted-dose compared with low-dose or minidose warfarin
therapy (INR ≤1.6) was more effective to prevent ischemic thromboembolic events in
patients with atrial fibrillation.
Keywords
Atrial fibrillation - thrombosis - warfarin - low-dose